1951-64 elections and labour opposition Flashcards
1
Q
1951 election results by seats
A
- conservative: 321
- labour: 295
- liberal: 6
- others: 3
2
Q
1951 election results by % of vote
A
- conservative: 48%
- labour: 48.8%
- liberal: 2.5%
- others: 0.7%
3
Q
1955 election results by seats
A
- conservative: 344
- labour: 277
- liberal: 6
- others: 3
4
Q
1955 election results by % of vote
A
- conservative: 49.7%
- labour: 46.4%
- liberal: 2.7%
- others: 1.2%
5
Q
1959 election results by seats
A
- conservative: 365
- labour: 258
- liberal: 6
- others: 1
6
Q
1959 election results by % of vote
A
- conservative: 49.4%
- labour: 43.8%
- liberal: 5.9%
- others: 0.9%
7
Q
what was the labour party divided over
A
- unilateralism as a policy, the CND
- clause IV (nationalisation)
- EEC
- trade union power
- direction of the party (centre right Gaitskell defeats Bevan as leader and leads to leftist Bevanites and Gaitskell supporting CDS)
8
Q
why did Labour lose elections in this period, most importantly the 1959 election
A
- internal divisions
- UK’s rising prosperity, ‘never had it so good’
- poor election campaign
9
Q
1951 election analysis
A
- not so much due to Labour’s decline but the Conservative’s recovery
- FPTP played an important role as Labour secured a higher vote share but less seats - a victim to it
10
Q
Labour’s 1951 election defeat
A
- Atlee’s government was worn out - many such as him and Bevan had been working continuously in government since 1940
- serious divisions had developed over left and right wings of the party over economic, welfare and foreign policies e.g. over prescription charges
- resentment among the trade unions over the party’s slowness in meeting demands
- labour found it difficult to shake image of austerity
- loss of large majority in 1950 election damaged moral and governing ability
11
Q
Conservative 1951 election victory
A
- recovered from the shock of their defeat in 1945
- reorganisation of the party with younger members such as Butler
- Lord Woolton had reformed the finances and organisation of the party - better positioned to fight for the 1951 election
- given a strong platform by their attack on the nationalisation of steel and iron
- they projected themselves as the upholders of liberty and individualism against the deadening hand of state centralisation and collectivism