1.7 - The nature or attributes of God Flashcards
Descartes on omnipotence
-god can do absolutely anything even that which is logically impossible
-the source of logic, has the power to suspend/replace logic whenever
-laws of maths only exist the way they do coz god created them
-god is capable of doing evil and not capable at the same time, we can’t see this as we are limited by human understanding
Criticisms of descartes view
-god can do anything but logical contradictions are not things
-not a lack of power/knowledge that stops it, they’re just nonsense
-god becomes a tyrant, capable of doing evil and turning on us
-humans cant rely on/understand god, a relationship with him is impossible
Problems for theodicy with descartes view
-theodicies put forward by christian thinkers suggest god cant act in any other way without depriving us of free will
-we must suffer in order for us to make free choices
-if god can suspend the laws of logic then the existence of evil becomes something god is able to change, this makes god not perfectly loving
Aquinas’ views on omnipotence
-god ‘can do everything that is absolutely possible’
-if something isnt logically possible it can’t be done even by god
-god can’t do anything that is inconsistent with his nature as this is also a contradiction, he is good so can’t do evil
Swinburne’s view on omnipotence
-god can do everything but ‘everything’ must be understood properly
-contradictory definitions are not ‘things’ so he cant do them
-this doesnt challenge gods omnipotence
Vardy’s views on omnipotence
-god created the universe in a way that he is necessarily limited
-if god acted differently the universe would not work as it does
-the universe is perfectly suited to free, rational beings
-he is still omnipotent as he limits his power himself
Macquarrie on limitations on omnipotence
-limitations on gods omnipotence are all self imposed
-he is not constrained by logic, the physical world or humans
Aquinas on omnipotence and religious language
-there will always be aspects of gods nature that we cant know
-for us to not fully understand gods omnipotence is expected
-when we think of power we think of human power which is different to gods power
Hartshorne on omnipotence
-total power means nothing can put up any resistance to it
-omnipotence means having total influence and effect, control over everything and nothing could do anything without gods allowance
-through free will beings are able to resist god meaning his power isnt total but its stronger than anyone else
What is omniscience
-god knows things that are unavailable to the human mind
-linked closely with the idea of wisdom
-god always knows the right thing to do, when to intervene, whats moral
Religions belief on free will/omniscience
-the belief that humans are morally responsible for some of their actions
-god doesnt compel people to choose, it is left to them to decide
-islam stresses life is a testing place where people choose right/wrong
-in christianity people are judged by god on moral decisions
Schleiermacher on free will/omniscience
-just because god has knowledge of our actions it doesnt mean we aren’t free to make choices, we would choose the same thing no matter what
Problems with Schleiermachers view
-gods knowledge is infallible, nothing he knows can end up false
-god knows the future rather than predicting it, means no real free will
-this means we cannot be held responsible for our moral choices
Problems with god creating us
-if god created every individual life and knew the future then he must have known the choices everyone will make, removing free will
-he can be held responsible for all evil that is done
-if god didnt know how we would turn out then it reduces his power
The view that god is eternal
-he is outside time and not bound by it
-god is the creator of time
-held by augustine, aquinas, anselm, boethius, schleiermacher