1688-1701 Flashcards
ascendency of william and mary
- flight of james II removed the main obstacle of william and mary’s ascension
- a few maintained that james was still the rightful king that william should be a regent or consort
- mary refused to rule without william and william threatened to leave the country if he wasn’t proclaimed king
- faced with a power vacuum if this happened, parliament conceded and made william of orange king william III
political settlement
- parliament was keen to prevent a repeat of the past and to ensure the king’s powers and limitations were clearly defined
- declaration of rights which they forced william to accept
- declaration affirmed the rights of people and parl:
- use of king’s prerogative to overrule parliament laws was declared illegal
- taxation without the consent of parliament was prohibited
- the requirement of regular parliament was established: triennial act
- parliament was continually in session for the duration of william’s regin but this was down to the fact that william’s foreign wars kept him out of the country for long periods of time, meaning parliament was required more for the day to day running of the country
religious settlements
- a comprehensive church was proposed. a national church system would still exist, but it would offer concessions to protestant dissenters one elements of anglican liturgy that they disagreed with so that they could be part of this wider church
- a tolerant church was proposed. those who could not be included in the national church would be tolerated so allowed to have their own churches outside
- both were backed by william but resisted by the dominant anglican establishment
financial settlement
- he brought the nation into war against france within months of being king
- rising costs of war resulted in ministers developing new taxes. they were actually paid as they were issued by parl so the people saw them as legitimate
commission of public accounts 1690
monitored how money was spent by the crown and directed how specific money would be spent for specific purposes had been allowed by the crown to smooth the financing of the war effort by providing proof of the legitimate use of tax revenue
bank of england
- founded in 1694 by an act of parl
- this was to create a controlled system of loans that would be made available to the crown. this increased control of the parliament over the crowns expenditure combined with the fact that the bank was ordained by parl increased the confidence of investors that their loans would be repaid
civil list 1698
the grant from parl to the crown of funds foe the cost of day to day running of government
establishment of a constitutional monarchy
- william’s rule as king was limited by parl
- william replaced the rightful king subverting the tradition of primogeniture that had lead monarchical succession for centuries
- according to the whig accounts of the events, the rev was the establishment of supremacy of parl over the monarchy
- the meddling of parl and the overthrow of a rightful king subverted the long time accepted notion of divine right, parliament gave the king authority to rule rather than god
convention parliament 1689
- james had broken the contract between the king and people (whig)
- he had violated the country’s fundamental laws (whig)
- his flight meant he had abdicated the throne (tory)
- 6th feb 1689, william and mary crowned
significance of bill of rights 1689
- clauses included specific abuses of the royal prerogative under charles II and james II
- another clause called for elections to be both regular and free reflected resentment among MPs
- the bill made certain the legal position of the army, which had been in some doubt
- made certain that a force could not be raised or kept in times of peace without the consent of parliament
- a number of mutiny acts were passed from 1689, ensuring that the king could not court martial at will without the consent of parl
limitations of bill of rights 1689
- was a statue law that could be revoked by any future parliament
- the bill was not a yardstick by which other laws could be judged and didn’t form part of a contract between the king and the people
- marxists argued that it was vague and that references in particular to holding frequent parliament could still allow for absolutism to creep in
mutiny act 1689
soldiers could not be court martial by the monarch without consent of parliament. act valid for 1 year ensured regular parliaments prior to triennial act
significant of act of settlement 1701
- the settlement stated that in order to bypass potential catholic heirs to the throne
- catholics and those married to catholics were barred from the succession tall future monarchy were required to be members of the C of E
- judges couldn’t be dismissed without consent of parl, a reaction to james’ of removal of disloyal members of the judiciary
- royal pardons to be declared irrelevant in cases of impeachment
- preventing the monarch from leaving without permission of parl
- no future monarch was allowed to enter england into a war in order to defend the monarch’s home country
- no foreign born man can be granted lands or tithes, be apart of the privy council, sit in either house of parliament or have a military command
what extent did the bill of rights and act of settlement confirm the end of divine right- whigs
- bill of rights preserved england’s ‘ancient constitution’ from the absolutism of james II
- present the political settlement as a starting point of a new constitution
- the interpretation presented parl as the supreme authority in the political system
what extent did the bill of rights and act of settlement and confirm the end of divine right- marxists
- present the settlement as one that created a constitutional monarchy
- they believe a constitutional monarchy wasn’t fully established
- parliament was an advisory board only
- parliament still represented only the richest 2% of the population
william III
- first truly protestant king
- he was a calvinist, which meant he was the wrong type of protestant in the eyes of many anglicans
- he lacked commitment to the anglican church and favoured the promotion of religious toleration for all protestants
impact of toleration act
- served to unify Protestantism and to direct any religious discontent against catholics
- only passed as a compromise to prevent the compensation bill, this suggests the main power elite still maintained a strong sense of anglicanism that they had at the restoration
- anglican churchmen concerned that worship within the C of E remained uniform and wasn’t modified
oath of allegiance
- act required everyone to take a new oath
-some refused to break their oath to james - number of high-ranking clegymen had to forfeit their positions
- this development caused the whigs to denounce the high church clergy as more loyal to james, resulting in the replacement and of some moderate figures
- act could be said to have contributed to the weakening of the established church
toleration acr 1689
- dissenters were exempled from punishment if they took an oath of allegiance to the crown and accepted the 1678 test act, meaning they were unable to enter public employment without swearing loyalty to anglican church
- dissenters not expected to attend anglican church, but their meetings closely monitored
- quakers refused to take oaths
- made it easier for dissenters to worship
william’s attitude to religious toleration
- in early 1689, william urged the removal of the sacramental test for public office holders which would mean repealing the test act
- compromise that a toleration act be passed with a promise for tory and anglican demands
evidence of reduced influence of anglican church
- toleration act and events served to undermine the established church in a number of ways, and the role of religion in local gov and legal system was also reduced
- accepted that the C of E couldn’t enforce complete uniformity and some allowances had to be made for dissenters
- catholics enjoyed reasonable degree of freedom despite being excluded from TA
- william used his royal authority to influence judges and to curb the church interference in the lives of catholics and dissenting sects
- the power of church courts was severely restricted by the TA
evidence the influence of anglican church was maintained
- the statutes enforcing uniformity weren’t repealed, which meant that public officials had to swear allegiance to the church
- to gain public employment or join parliament, there was no choice but to swear allegiance to the crown and take anglican communion
- no theological debate between MPs and peers before the TA. it can be seen as a reactionary attempt to maintain order and preserve the anglican church
toleration act did little to undermine anglican supremacy
- public office and higher education were to remain under anglican control
- the laws against dissenters holding office to remain in force, the ban on dissenters attending britain’s zunis
- no freedom of worship for catholics, unitarians or jews
- meeting houses had to be registered with local JPs
- dissenter office holder had to do was set aside religious and participate in anglican services
- agreed to the toleration act in order to prevent the weakening of anglicanism
toleration act did undermine anglican supremacy
- didn’t repeal laws against dissenters
- all protestant churches to be tolerated
- toleration act not only freed dissenters from having to go to church but also the lazy, skeptical and sleepy
- church’s ability to demand obedience and good behaviour from its followers was weakening