1.5.3 Treatment and management of obsessive-compulsive disorder Flashcards

1
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

What medication is most used to treat OCD?

A

SSRIs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

How do SSRIs work?

A

These medications work by blocking the serotonin from being reabsorbed once a message has been passed from one neuron to another, meaning serotonin levels remain higher.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

What is the effect of SSRIs on OCD?

A

They reduce the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, as they seem to lessen the anxiety associated with the disorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

What did Soomro et al. (2008) find out about treating OCD with SSRIs?

A

He reviewed the results of 17 studies which compared the effectiveness of SSRIs with placebos.

The studies measured symptoms using Y-BOCS, and in all studies, SSRIs as a group were more effective than placebos at reducing OCD symptoms 6-13 weeks after treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

What did Selvi et al. (2011) discover about the effectiveness of 2 other drugs on OCD patients who did not respond successfully to SSRIs?

A

They tested aripiprazole and risperidone on 41 patients with OCD who did not repond successfully to SSRIs, and found that risperidone was the better drug to improve the OCD condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

Remission

A

If you’re in partial remission, it means you can take a break from treatment as long as the illness doesn’t begin again.

Complete remission means that tests, physical exams and scans show that all signs of your illness are gone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

What did Askari et al. (2012) learn about the effectiveness of granisetron being used alongside SSRI fluvoxamine?

A

Some ppts were given granisetron, whilst the others received a placebo.

They were assessed using the Y-BOCS and had all been diagnosed prior using the DSM-5.

By week 8 of treatment, 100% of the granisetron group had scored a complete response (minimum 35% reduction in Y-BOCS) and 90% had met the remission criterion. This is compared to only 35% in the placebo group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

Why should SSRIs be effective at treating OCD?

A

If we assume low serotonin levels cause OCD, then drugs can be used to increase serotonin activity.

Clomipramine is a drug like this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SSRIs - Biological treatments

Criticisms of SSRIs to treat OCD

A
  • Cannot offer full explanation or cure.
  • Drugs may be palliative- when they stop being taken, symptoms return.
  • Psychological interventions show a strong effect and yet don’t rely on drugs/physical intervention.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Exposure and response therapy (ERP) - Psychological treatments

Exposure and response prevention (ERP)

A

A form of CBT.

Individuals are exposed to stimuli that provoke their obsessions and the associated distress, while at the same time they are helped to prevent their compulsive behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exposure and response therapy (ERP) - Psychological treatments

Example of ERP

A

Individual may be exposed to a door handle, which would elicit obsessions surrounding dirt/germs, along with a desire to carry out a compulsion like handwashing.

Individual is helped not to wash their hands but instead tolerate the anxiety and accept their obsession.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Aim

A

To investigate the efficacy of CBT for a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and OCD.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Method

A

Case study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Participant

A
  • 12-year-old
  • Named Jason
  • Obsessions = contamination
  • Compulsions = handwashing
  • Had ASD
  • ASD symptoms = sensory issues, self-harm, limited/repetitive language and play, poor social responses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Part 1

A

Jason identified feelings of distress with the therapist and was taught ‘coping strategies’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Example of a coping strategy

A

‘I know that nothing bad will happen.’

16
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Part 2

A

Exposed to ‘contaminated’ stimuli, such as door handles/elevator buttons, which produced anxiety or disgust.

The exposure involved Jason being asked to tough these repeatedly until his anxiety levels dropped.

Exposure became increasingly more difficult and in between sessions, he practised the exposure by handing out papers at school, for example.

17
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Results

A
  • Y-BOCS score dropped from 18 to 3.
  • 3 months later, Jason showed no sign of relapse.
18
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Conclusion

A

CBT can be personalised for children with additional needs.

19
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Strength

A

Valid = triangulation of data using psychometric tests, observations, medical records etc.

20
Q

Lehmkuhl et al. (2008) - ERP - Psychological treatments

Criticisms

A
  • Case study = ungeneralisable to others.
  • RWA = may have only been effective due to that specific therapist.
21
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Context

A

Weekly, in-person therapy is costly and lengthy waiting lists can make it inaccesible.

22
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Aim and hypothesis

A

To compare telephone vs face-to-face ERP CBT treatment.

Telephone ERP is not less effective than face-to-face ERP.

23
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Method

A

Randomised control trial, independent measures, longitudinal.

24
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Participants

A

72 16-65 year-old outpatients with OCD from the UK.

All scored 16+ on the Y-BOCS and did not suffer from substance misuse or other conditions.

25
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Sampling

A

Opportunity sample.

26
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

How were ppts assigned to each condition?

What were the conditions?

A

Randomly assigned to either the telephone or face-to-face condition (independent measures design).

27
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Explain the sessions of CBT

A

Exposure response prevention therapy, either delivered traditionally through a 60-minute face-to-face session, or by a shorter telephone call (up to 30 minutes).

28
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

How many sessions were given to each ppt?

How often?

A

10 weekly sessions.

29
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

How many therapists carried out the treatments?

How was the consistency of treatment maintained?

A

2 experienced therapists (one at each clinic carried out both type).

Therapist manuals were used, alongside fortnightly supervision sessions and 4-monthly training days.

30
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

How were ppts assessed prior to treatment?

A

Prior to treatment, all ppts were assessed twice, 4 weeks apart, using the Y-BOCS to measure the severity of their OCD and BDI to measure feelings of depressive disorder.

31
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

How were ppts assessed after treatment?

A

Ppts were assesed using the Y-BOCS and BDI immediately following treatment, then at 1, 3 and 6-month follow-ups.

There were also given a client satisfaction questionnaire.

32
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

What was there no significant difference in between the groups before treatment or at any of the follow-up assessments?

A

No significant difference in symptom severity between the telephone and face-to-face groups.

33
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Did client satisfaction differ?

A

Client satisfaction did not differ immediately after treatment.

34
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

For what percentage of ppts in each group was treatment successful for?

A
  • Telephone group = 77%
  • Face-to-face group = 67%
35
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Conclusions

A

Telephone ERP CBT for OCD is as effective as face-to-face therapy, despite 50% less therapist contact time.

36
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Strengths

A
  • Valid = random allocation should control for researcher bias/individual differences.
  • Reliable = baseline measure were taken twice (test-retest reliability).
  • Standardised = objective scales for measurement and trained therapists.
  • RWA = cheaper more accessible alternative to traditional CBT but just as effective.
37
Q

LOVELL ET AL. (2006)

Criticisms

A
  • Cultural bias = hard to generalise since the sample was small.
  • Self-report = risk of demand characteristics/social desirability bias since answers are subjective.
  • Longitudinal = 11 ppts dropped out, attrition can cause reduced validity/generalisability.
38
Q

Issues and debates

Do SSRIs show individual or situational factors?

A

Only takes individual serotonin levels into account, not the situation that may cause the symptoms to appear.