Key Protocols Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What offences are summary-only?

A
  • Assault
  • Battery
  • Simple criminal damage where the value is £5,000 or less is treated as summary only.

An attempt to commit simple criminal damage £5,000 or less is treated as summary only.

Attempt to commit a summary only offence

  • Assault and battery cannot be the object of a criminal attempt (as summary only offences).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What offences are either-way?

A
  • Theft- s 1 Theft Act 1968
  • Burglary- s 9(1)(a) or s 9(1)(b) Theft Act 1968
  • Fraud:
  • by false representation
  • by abuse of position
  • by failing to disclose
  • Assault occasioning actual bodily harm- s 47 Offences Against the Person Act (OAPA) 1861
  • Wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm- s 20 OAPA 1861
  • Simple criminal damage where the value exceeds £5,000
  • Simple arson

Attempts to commit either-way offences will be triable either way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What offences are indictable-only?

A
  • Robbery- s 8 Theft Act 1968
  • Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm with intent- s 18 OAPA 1861
  • Aggravated burglary- s 10 Theft Act 1968
  • Aggravated arson
  • Aggravated criminal damage
  • Murder- where a verdict of voluntary manslaughter can be a possible outcome
  • Involuntary manslaughter:
  • unlawful act manslaughter
  • manslaughter by gross negligence

Attempts to commit indictable only offences will be triable only on indictment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What kind of offence is criminal damage?

A

Criminal damage is an important exception to the rule that all offences fall into one, and only one, of the three classifications of offences.

Criminal damage can be:

  • a summary only; or
  • an either-way offence.

Section 22 Magistrates’ Court Act (MCA) 1980 states that the value of the damage determines the classification of the offence. However, this does not apply where criminal damage is caused by fire – arson is always an either-way offence.

The relevant sum is £5,000. Where the value of the damage is £5,000 or below, the offence is summary only. Above £5,000 and the offence is triable either-way.

The value of the damage is the cost of replacement where the property was destroyed. Where the property was damaged it is the cost of repair or replacement, whichever is the less.

The offence(s) are categorised as summary only. The maximum sentence for criminal damage when tried as a summary only offence is three months’ imprisonment or a fine at level 4 on the standard scale. The defendant cannot be committed for sentence.

The offence(s) are triable either way. If they are tried in a magistrates’ court then the maximum sentence is twelve months’ imprisonment or a fine at level 5 on the standard scale. The defendant can be committed for sentence. The maximum sentence on indictment is ten years’ imprisonment.

Where the value of the damage is uncertain, i.e. it is not known whether or not it exceeds £5,000, the defendant is asked if they consent to be tried summarily. If so, that will take place and the maximum sentence will be limited to three months or a level 4 fine. If the defendant does not consent then the offence(s) will be treated as either-way and the higher sentencing powers will apply on conviction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of offence is shop lifting?

A

Low value shoplifting, where the value does not exceed £200, is now said to be a summary only offence.

When read fully, however, the statute still allows an adult defendant to elect trial in the Crown Court. You should therefore continue to treat shoplifting as a theft which is an either-way offence.

Note: ‘shoplifting’ is not an offence in any event. Where a person has allegedly shoplifted, they are properly charged with theft.

In reality the only difference that the supposed reclassification of the offence makes is that a magistrate’s court cannot decline jurisdiction at the mode of trial hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens when the accused is asked to enter a plea?

A

(a) If they plead guilty, the court moves to sentence.

(b) If they plead not guilty, there is a trial and the court comes to a verdict.

(i) If the verdict is guilty, the defendant must be sentenced.

(ii) If they are not guilty, the defendant is acquitted of the charge and is free to go.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where do each of the courts appeal to?

A

i. The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) hears appeals from the Crown Court in its capacity as a trial court.

· The Supreme Court hears appeals from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on points of law of general public importance.

b. The Crown Court (in its capacity as an appeal court). Hears appeals from the magistrates’ court and Youth Courts.

i. The High Court can hear appeals by way of case stated and judicial review cases from the Crown Court (in its capacity as an appeal court).

c. High Court (Queens Bench Division)- hears appeals by way of case stated and judicial review from the magistrates’ court.

2)The Youth Court- All defendants under the age of 18 have their first hearing before a court here unless they are jointly charged with an adult. Trial of all youths (under 18) defendants unless they are sent to the Crown Court for trial. There are two potential places a case might go from here:

a. The Crown Court (in its capacity as an appeal court). Hears appeals from the magistrates’ court and Youth Courts.

i. The High Court can hear appeals by way of case stated and judicial review cases from the Crown Court (in its capacity as an appeal court).

b. High Court (Queens Bench Division)- hears appeals by way of case stated and judicial review.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are indictable offences?

A

Where a statute refers to an offence as ‘indictable’ this means that the offence is capable of being tried on indictment and, therefore, covers both either-way and indictable only offences. The magistrates’ court is a court of summary jurisdiction. Therefore, a summary only offence can only be dealt with by a magistrates’ court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is funding needed for police station advice?

A

Police station advice

All suspects are entitled to free legal advice at the police station regardless of their means.

This is accessed through the Defence Solicitor Call Centre (‘DSCC’) but is limited to telephone only advice for non-imprisonable offences.

The practitioner who attends must be an accredited representative. Throughout the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), any reference to a solicitor means ‘a solicitor who holds a practising certificate or an accredited or probationary representative included on the register maintained by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) (Code of Practice C 6.12).

Many accredited representatives will be trainees, paralegals or ex-police officers. Any reference to solicitors at the police station should be taken to include accredited representatives. Solicitors must also complete the accreditation process in order to attend at the police station under a LAA contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If funding needed for representation in court?

A
  • Once your client has been charged you need to arrange funding for their court appearance.
  • If they are not paying privately then the cost of their defence may be covered by public funding through the Legal Aid Agency.
  • In order to obtain a ‘representation order’ a defendant must pass two tests:
  • the means test; and
  • the merits test (the ‘interests of justice’ test).
  • Both tests must be passed in order to secure public funding.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the general criteria for the means test?

A

Some defendants are ‘passported’ meaning they automatically pass the means test and do not have to complete the Financial Statement for Legal Aid in Criminal Proceedings (CRM 15) form:

  • defendants under 18 years of age; and/or
  • those on specified welfare benefits such as Universal Credit and income-based jobseeker’s allowance.

All other defendants have to demonstrate their eligibility but the means test differs depending on whether the case is tried in the magistrates’ court or Crown Court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the criteria for the means test at a Magistrate’s Court?

A

An initial assessment works out their weighted gross annual income i.e. the applicant’s gross annual income is generally added to any partner’s (unless the partner is the complainant, a prosecution witness or a co-defendant in conflict with the applicant). A weighting is applied to take into account the number of people living in the household. Once this figure is calculated the applicant will:

  • Be eligible for public funding- if below the lower threshold i.e. at present if the weighted gross annual income is £12,475 or less
  • Be ineligible for public funding- if above the upper threshold i.e. at present, if the weighted gross annual income is £22,325 or more
  • Be required to undertake a full means test (form CRM15)- if in between the lower and upper thresholds i.e. at present, more than £12,475 and less than £22, 325. The full means test will establish the applicant’s annual household disposable income- if it is below the threshold the applicant will be funded (at present if the annual household disposable income threshold is £3,398 or less).

The applicant can apply for an eligibility review if they have failed the means test or hardship review if for example they have unusually high outgoings or defence costs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the criteria for the means test at a Crown Court?

A
  • The applicant is assessed on their income and capital, including any equity in properties owned by the applicant.
  • After a combined capital and equity allowance of £30,000, applicants can be required to contribute any balance towards their defence costs.
  • The outcome of the assessment may require defendants to pay:
  • all
  • some; or
  • none of the costs of defending their case.
  • If a contribution towards their defence costs are required, it can come from income (payable throughout the case) and/or capital (payable at the end, if any income contributions have not covered the defence costs).

In relation to the applicant’s annual household disposable income, the applicant will be:

  • ineligible for public funding- if above the eligibility threshold i.e. £37,500 or more at present.
  • eligible for public funding without any contribution- if below the threshold i.e. £3, 398 or less at present.
  • eligible for public funding with a contribution- if in between the thresholds i.e. between £3,399 and £37,499.99 at present. The income based-contribution is 90 percent of disposable income for a maximum of six months in instalments and subject to a maximum based on the type of offence (refunded with interest if the defendant is acquitted).

The applicant can apply for an eligibility review if they have failed the means test or a hardship review if subject to a contribution order e.g. if the applicant suspects an error or circumstances have changed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the criteria for the merits test?

A

In order to pass the merits test the defendant must complete a form (CRM14- Application for Legal Aid in Criminal proceedings) in order to demonstrate that it is in the interests of justice for them to be legally represented.

A defendant will automatically pass the interests of justice test if:

  • charged with an indictable-only offence; or
  • an either-way offence is later sent to the Crown Court.

The interests of justice test requires the defendant to provide information in support all or some of the 10 propositions in the application form. The purpose of the 10 propositions is to evaluate whether the matter is so serious or complicated that the defendant could not conduct their own defence.

The 10 propositions

I will lose my liberty

I have been given a sentence that is suspended or non-custodial. If I break this, the court may be able to deal with me for the original offence.

It is likely I will lose my livelihood

It is likely I will suffer serious damage to my reputation

A substantial question of law may be involved

I may not be able to understand the court proceedings or present my own case

Witnesses may need to be traced or interviewed on my behalf

The proceedings may involve expert cross examination of a prosecution witness

It is in the interests of another person that I am represented

Any other reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

I will lose my liberty

A

To determine whether a defendant is likely to receive a custodial sentence reference must be made to the aggravating and mitigating factors in the sentencing guidelines. It is not enough that the offence is imprisonable.

The term ‘likely’ has been argued as meaning a ‘real and practical one’.

I have been given a sentence that is suspended or non-custodial. If I break this, the court may be able to deal with me for the original offence.

All details of any suspended or non-custodial sentence should be provided in this section. If a defendant is not complying with the terms of a non-custodial sentence, then this will mean that a sentencing court may be of the view that they should not be given the benefit of a community-based sentence if convicted of this offence. If a defendant has received a suspended sentence which is not over, then the court should activate the suspended sentence once they are convicted of the new offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

It is likely I will lose my livelihood

A

If the defendant pleads guilty and requires representation to convey mitigation that will avoid a penalty interfering with employment, this needs to be argued here, otherwise the court may take the view that the defendant is, with the assistance of the court, capable of representing themselves.

Note that even where a defendant is pleading guilty, if a custodial sentence is likely, then they will generally pass the interests of justice test.

17
Q

It is likely I will suffer serious damage to my reputation

A

The key term to focus on is ‘serious’. Clearly, a conviction to a person who is currently ‘of good character’ is going to affect their reputation in terms of future or current job prospects.

Equally a conviction for a sexual offence is damaging to those who may have convictions but of a different type (e.g. theft offences).

Is the defendant a professional e.g. a school teacher?

What is the nature of the allegation e.g. sexual assault?

18
Q

A substantial question of law may be involved

A

Providing brief examples such as ‘all elements of the offence’ and ‘identification’ are likely to result in the representation order being refused, based on insufficient details to justify the eligibility criteria.

Identify an issue of law rather than fact.

Is there a question regarding admissibility e.g. breach of PACE? Are case authorities to be relied on?

19
Q

I may not be able to understand the court proceedings or present my own case

A

What language does the defendant normally speak?Why is an interpreter not sufficient?Are there legal phrases or technical areas of law the defendant would still not understand if an interpreter is provided?Is the defendant a youth?Does the defendant suffer from any learning difficulties or mental health issues?

20
Q

Witnesses may need to be traced or interviewed on my behalf

A

If witnesses are known, why is it that the solicitor needs to speak to the witness rather than the defendant speaking to them?Why does the witness need to be traced? Is it a member of the public?Consider providing the court with the kind of evidence the defendant is seeking to adduce via this witness.

21
Q

The proceedings may involve expert cross examination of a prosecution witness

A

This section requires more than simply demonstrating a lack of knowledge of proper court procedures.

Consider:

Could the defendant satisfactorily conduct a trial without the solicitor but with the assistance of the authorised court officer?Are there any issues in the case that make it difficult for the defendant to cross examine the witnesses?Age of defendant?Is there any legal argument?Are the complainants also witnesses?Will an experienced police officer require cross examination?

22
Q

It is in the interests of another person that I am represented

A

Consider whether the complainant/victim would feel uncomfortable if cross examined by the defendant personally (for example if the allegation is of a sexual nature).The victim is young.The fact that the defendant has a family that will suffer if they go to prison does not fall under the ‘interests of another person’. It has to be someone involved in the court proceedings.

23
Q

When is the representation order granted?

A

Once a representation order is granted, a solicitor can start working on preparing the case in the magistrates’ court and in due course, will be able to claim for:

  • Preparation, including taking instructions, interviewing witnesses, assessing the prosecution case, advising on plea and mode of trial, preparing and perusing documents, dealing with letters and telephone calls which are not routine, preparing for advocacy, instructing counsel in the Crown Court, instructing expert witnesses, conferences, consultations, views, and work done in connection with advice on appeal or case stated.
  • Advocacy, including applications for bail and other applications before the court.
  • Routine letters and telephone calls.
24
Q

What happens if the defendant fails the means or merits test?

A
  • If the defendant:
  • Fails the means test- there is no right of appeal but they can submit another form if their circumstances have changed.
  • Fails the merits test in the magistrates’ court- they can submit another application and if unsuccessful, can appeal to the magistrates’ court.
  • If the defendant fails either or both tests they may consult with the duty solicitor, provided they are charged with an imprisonable offence. However, the duty solicitor can only represent them on one occasion – usually the first hearing at court.
  • Defendants can instruct a solicitor privately if they do not qualify for public funding.
  • Alternatively, the defendant would have to represent themselves with the assistance and support of the court.
25
Q

When might the defence have the legal burden of proof?

A

An example where the defendant has the burden to prove something would be one of the defences, such as insanity. It is not proper or reasonable for the prosecution to prove every single defendant in the world is sane. It is up to individual defendants to indicate (through their advocates) that they are asserting a lack of mens rea by virtue of insanity. That assertion needs to be made by the defence, and proved by the defence. The standard for anything that the defence has to prove is the balance of probabilities.

26
Q
A