13th Feb - TFs = key determinants of cell fate Flashcards

1
Q

What are master transcription factors?

A

Switches on appropriate cell type specific genes and switches off non-appropriate genes through the induction of TFs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give an example of a master TF

A

Oct 4 –> stem cell pluripotency

GATA-1 –> erythrocyte development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the key limitation in inducing certain types of adult cells from ESCs?

A

Our knowledge of TFs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is pluripotency maintained?

A

Through Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How were Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog identified as the main pluripotency factors by Boyer (2005)?

A

ChIP-chip for Oct4, Sox3, Nanog

  • Found they co-occupy many target genes
  • -E.g. HOXb1, GOLGA6, IER5L
  • -Half the promoter regions bound both Both Oct4 and Sox2 were also bound by Nanog
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is GATA-1?

A

The master TF for erthryocytes which binds to the GATA sequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How was GATA-1 identified as binding to the GATA sequence?

A

through a gel-shift assay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline the pathway of GATA-2

A

GATA-2 creates the oligopotent precursor (CMP) –> GATA-1 creates the megakaryocyte erythyroid precursor (MEP) –> GATA1 and KLF1 induce a red blood cell, GATA1 and Fli-1 induce platelets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the binding sites shown through Chip-seq for GATA1?

A

5749 binding site
Only 13% of which bind at the promoter
Targets itself GATA-2, KLF-1 etc. potentiating red blood cell differentiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did KLF1 Chip-seq by Tallack show?

A

That it is erythroid specific
Most binding sites are distal i.e. enhancers
There is a big overlap between GATA1 and KLF1 binding sites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is de-differentiation prevented in erythrocytes?

A

GATa1 and GATA2 are expressed mutually exclusively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can the transcriptome be reprogrammed?

A

By replacing the master TF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who first demonstrated cell reprogramming in 1987?

A

Davis, Weintraub and Lassar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline the experiment of Davis, Weintraub and Lasser (1987)

A

Treated mouse C3H/DT1/2 embryonic fibroblasts with 5-azacytidine converting them to myoblasts
Found 3 genes which can conver embryonic fibroblasts to myoblasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is MyoD1?

A

A myoblasts specific cDNA which can alone convert a fibroblast to a myoblast, it shares a coding region with myc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of transdifferentiation

A

Fibroblasts + (myoD)–> Muscle cells
Monocytic precursors + (GATA1) –> erythroid megakaryocytic cells
Fibroblasts + (Oct4, sox2, Klf4, Myc) –> iPSCs

17
Q

Who won the nobel prize in 2012?

A

Yamanake for the discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed to become pluripotent

18
Q

How did Yamanaka (2006) create an iPSC?

A

He identified 24 candidate genes
Detected pluripotent state by resistance to G418
Introduced each gene into mouse embryonic fibroblasts
Then to identify which were critical they examined the effect of withdrawal of individual factors

Identified Oct4, Sox3, Klf4 and Myc were essential

(Nanog wasn’t required as this is induced by Sox2 and Oct4)

19
Q

What is the frequency of successful iPSC derivation?

A

About 1 in 10000 cells

20
Q

What is the main obstacle to de-differentiation?

A

Epigenetics

21
Q

What is Waddington’s epigenetic landscape?

A

Concept that each valley represents a cell fate decision, once it reaches the bottom it has lost its potential as it accumulates DNA methylation