139 exam 2 Flashcards
Crude birth rate (CBR)
i. Not adjusting numbers for anything
ii. Births per 1000 people per year
iii. Geographically uneven—Africa = high, USA = low
Crude death rate (CDR)
i. Number of deaths per 1000 people per year
ii. Also geographically uneven—Africa/peripheries = high, USA/cores = low
Rates of natural increase
i. Crude birth rate minus crude death rate
ii. Greatest rates tend to be in peripheries and some semi-peripheries
iii. Slow increase and possible decrease in cores
1. Decreasing in Germany and Russia
iv. Politics, economics, and infrastructure are factors
1. Public health
2. Drawing of political boundary makes significant effects on survival of baby
Demographic transtition
i. In multiple countries in last centuries have period of growing birth rates (population) b/c CBR and CDR have been out of sync
ii. Phases:
1. High CDR and CBR are both high
2. CDR falls and CBR stays same—due to vaccinations, clean water, etc.
3. Birth rate falls
4. Both are low
Demographic momentum
i. Geographically uneven
1. Interested in biological gender (men and women)
a. Differences are caused by war, slavery, etc.
The tendency for growing population to continue growing after a fertility decline because once this happens a country moves to a different stage in the demographic transition model
Population pyramid
i. Peripheries: pyramid is wide at bottom → population increases
1. Issues with peripheries based on core-periphery model
ii. Cores: pyramid is more of a bar → no population change
iii. **Different population issues due to differences in pyramid
1. Time, dynamics, age of population, where, etc.
2. Where, political links, and structure of economics
Carrying capacity
Maximum number of people that can be supported by given unit of area (i.e. resources)
Overshoot
i. When a population’s demand on an ecosystem to regenerate consumed resources
ii. Up and down over carrying capacity line
Diminishing returns
Form of Malthusian limit;
The principle that, at some point, adding more of a variable input, such as labor, to the same amount of a fixed input, such as capital, will cause the marginal product of the variable input to decline
Problems with extending the carrying capacity concept to humans
i. Temporal, spatial, and social variation in consumption
ii. Needs vs. wants
iii. Technology (resources are culturally AND technologically defined)
iv. The capacity of an ecosystem to absorb waste
Malthusian view on relationship between population, resources, and technology
Mostly concerned with conditioned that gave mortality and vice versa
Implications:
a. Population growth is limited by agricultural resources
b. Land degradation is more likely as one approaches resources limit
c. Population growth leads to declining quality of life one approaches resources
Contingencies:
a. Migration and birth control
b. Means of production
c. Culture
d. Relations of production
e. **can lead to Boserupian elasticity
If he is right, Amazonia, Congo, and Sahel should be inhabitanted
Boserupian view on relationship between population, resources, and technology
- Trying to improve agricultural yields in sub-Saharan
a. Much better responses from high density areas
b. Is Malthus wrong? - Resources are dependent on population (not other way around)
- Argument:
a. Intensification (technologies, new discoveries, etc.) increases productivity of land, but reduces returns per unit of labor (need much more labor)
b. Given diminishing returns, farmers will only intensify agricultural production when necessary (i.e. population increases)
i. Problem creates need for solution
c. Population on growth induces technological advances and higher living - If he is correct, China and India should not exist
The numbers game
Too many people?
i. If wanted to live on need only, whole world could live in Europe solely (Germany to be exact) and food comes from Europe area
ii. If lived on wants, whole population could live on continent of Russia and produce food in Africa
Private property regime
i. Individuals and firms are involved
ii. Supported by public bureaucracy (rules)
Common property regime
i. Clearly defined social group (village owns)
ii. Supported by councils and participatory governance—how to manage resources; no free access
Open access
i. System resource procurement
ii. No one many be excluded
iii. No rules
Common pool resources
i. Access restrictions difficult to enforce—i.e. fishing in Atlantic
ii. Rules difficult to enforce
Structure and purpose of ‘Tragedy of commons’ models
i. Model is for simplification
ii. Want to hold some of complexities still and only look at few variables
1. Land tenure—rules and processes to assessing properties
2. Resources
3. Overshoot—issue between population and resources
iii. Must make assumptions and conditions to make model work
iv. Spits out inferences, and then get to conclusions
v. Inputs (assumptions) → Resource, Land tenure, Overshoot → Outputs → Conclusion
**Model mechanics of Hardin’s tragedy of the commons
- Gov’t regulation and redistribution through taxes (very ineffective)
- Divide commons into private parcels
- Gov’t ownership = command and control (ineffective)
Problems to Hardin’s model
Conceptual conflation and flawed assumptions
1. Based model on non-existing situation
Flawed assumptions and conditions
1. Legal reason for privatizing common leads to erosion of soil BUT…not enough scientific evidence
Flawed outputs
- Tragedy of privatization
a. i.e. Masasai people of East Africa
Flawed inference
- Private parcels and mutual coercion
a. Hardin went straight to conclusion (privatization from environmental degradation)
b. Conditions favorable to sustaining communal governance (socio-ecological and governance)
Contrary examples to Hardin’s model
Isle of Axholme, North Lincolnshire, England
- Communal investment of infrastructure
- 400 years of common property exercised
Swiss “Alpwirtschaft”
- Moving cattle around so environmental degradation doesn’t happen
- Based on common property regulations
Israel Kibbutz
1. Common property AND common resources regime
Fallow
Letting field rest to regain organic and environmental benefits
Shifting cultivation
i. Moving field productions over time
ii. Allowing fields to go into fallow