1.3 Government intervention Flashcards

1
Q

What are indirect taxes?

A

Indirect taxes are taxes imposed on spending to buy goods and services. They are paid partly by consumers but are paid to the government by producers (firms).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are excise taxes?

A

Taxes imposed on particular goods and services such as petrol, cigarettes and alcohol - usually to influence the consumption of these goods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are sales taxes?

A

Taxes on all (or most) goods and services (VAT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two types of indirect taxes?

(applicability)

A
  • Excise taxes
  • Sales taxes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two types of indirect (excise) taxes?

(method of taxation)

A
  • Specific taxes
  • Ad valorem taxes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are direct taxes and how do they differ from indirect taxes?

A

Direct taxes are taxes paid directly by the taxpayer, indirect are not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do excise taxes affect the allocation of resources?

A

As excise taxes increase the price paid by consumers, they would reduce their spending on such goods.

Excise taxes also lower the price received by producers, causing them to produce less.

So by changing prices signals and incentives, excise taxes affect the allocation of resources.

This may either increase or decrease allocate efficiency depending on the situation prior to the tax.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why might a government impose indirect (excise) taxes?

(4)

A
  1. Excise taxes are a source of government revenue.
  2. Excise taxes are a method to discourage consumption of a good that may be harmful - ‘vice’ or ‘sin’ taxes.
  3. Excise taxes can be used to redistribute income.
  4. Excise taxes are a method to improve the allocation of resources (reduce allocative inefficiencies) by correcting negative externalities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are specific taxes?

A

A fixed amount of tax per unit of the good or service sold e.g. $5 per packet of cigarettes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are ad valorem taxes?

A

A fixed percentage of the price of the good or service is taxed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can you diagrammatically show:

a) a specific tax
b) an ad valorem tax

A

Both are leftward shifts of supply.

a) it is constant so the supply curve just moves upwards by the tax per unit
b) as it is a percentage, the tax per unit increases each time, so, the gradient of the supply curve increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can you diagrammatically show the impact on the market of imposing:

a) a direct tax
b) an ad valorem tax

A

P* and Q* are original market equilibrium positions.

Pc and Qt are where the “new” supply intersects demand.

Pp is the price at Qt on the original supply curve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the market impacts of imposing an indirect tax?

(7)

A
  • Equilibrium quantity produced and consumed falls from Q* to Qt
  • Equilibrium price paid by consumers increases from P* to Pc
  • Consumer expenditure changes from (P* x Q*) to (Pc x Qt )
  • Price received by the firm falls from (P* to Pp), which is (Pc - tax per unit)
  • The firm’s revenue falls from P* x Q* to Pp x Qt
  • The government receives a tax revenue of (tax per unit x Qt) or (Pc - Pp x Qt)
  • Underallocation of resources as Qt is below the market equilibrium of Q*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What consequences would an indirect tax have on:

  • Consumers
  • Producers
  • The government
  • Workers
  • Society as a whole
A

Consumers: Lose out. They pay a higher price, for less of a good.

Producers: Lose out. They receive a lower price, for less of the good - revenue decreases.

The government: Gains. They receive more revenue, good for the government budget and achieving policy aims.

Workers: Lose out. Less output means fewer workers required which may lead to redundancies and unemployment.

Society: Loses out. Underallocation of resources.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a welfare loss (deadweight loss)?

A

The welfare benefits that are lost to society due to resources not being allocated efficiently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can you diagrammatically show an indirect tax’s impact on consumer, producer and social surplus?

A

Consumer surplus decreases.

Producer surplus decreases.

Government revenue increases.

Social surplus decreases, therefore a welfare loss of a + b is created.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is tax incidence?

A

The burden of the tax.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who faces a greater tax incidence when demand is inelastic?

Diagram?

A

Consumers

19
Q

Who faces a greater tax incidence when demand is elastic?

Diagram?

A

Producers

20
Q

Who faces a greater tax incidence when supply is inelastic?

Diagram?

A

Producers

21
Q

Who faces a greater tax incidence when supply is elastic?

Diagram?

A

Consumers

22
Q

What is a subsidy?

A

The financial assistance by the government to individuals or groups, such as firms, consumers, industries or sectors of the economy.

23
Q

How do subsidies generally alter the allocation of resources?

A

Subsidies increase the price that producers receive and lower the price that consumers pay, this causes quantity supplied/demanded to increase. Increasing consumption and output.

24
Q

What are six reasons a government might grant subsidies?

A
  • To increase revenues (and incomes) of producers.
  • To make certain goods (usually necessities) affordable to low-income consumers.
  • To encourage production and consumption of particular goods and services that are believed to be desirable to consumers/society.
  • To support the growth of particular industries, usually infant industries.
  • To encourage exports of particular goods.
  • To improve the allocation of resources (reduce allocative inefficiencies) by correcting positive externalities.
25
Q

How can you diagrammatically show a subsidy being imposed?

How can you diagrammatically show the impacts on the market?

A

Subsidies increase supply, so the supply curve shifts down by the value of subsidy per unit.

P* and Q* are original market equilibrium positions.

Pc and Qsb are where the “new” supply intersects demand.

Pp is the price at Qsb on the original supply curve.

26
Q

What are the market impacts of imposing a subsidy?

(5)

A
  • Equilibrium quantity produced and consumed increases from Q* to Qsb.
  • The equilibrium price falls from P* to Pc; this is the price paid by consumers.
  • The price received by producers increases from P* to Pp
  • The cost of the subsidy is given by (the subsidy per unit x Qsb) or (Pp-Pc x Qsb)
  • There is an overallocation of resources to the production of the good as Qsb is greater than the market equilibrium.
27
Q

What consequences would a subsidy have on:

  • Consumers
  • Producers
  • The government
  • Workers
  • Society as a whole
  • Foreign producers
A

Consumers: Gain. They can consume a greater quantity at a lower price.

Producers: Gain. They can receive a higher price at a greater quantity supplied - revenue increases.

The government: Loses out. A greater burden on the budget, meaning they either have to raise taxes or run a budget deficit.

Workers: Gain. As the output increases, there may be a greater requirement for workers, so employment may increase.

Society as a whole: Loses out. There is an overallocation of resources as Qsb > Q*

Foreign producers: Lose out or gain. If they are dependant on imports (complementary goods), the lower price would mean that they gain. If they are competing with domestic producers (i.e. substitute goods), they would be worse off.

28
Q

How can you diagrammatically show the impact of a subsidy on consumer, producer and social surplus?

A

There is a gain in producer surplus.

There is a gain in consumer surplus.

There is a welfare loss created at a.

29
Q

What is a price control?

A

The setting of minimum or maximum prizes by the government (or private organisations) so that prices are unable to adjust to their equilibrium levels determined by market forces.

30
Q

What is a price ceiling?

A

A legal maximum price for a particular good.

31
Q

How would you diagrammatically show a price ceiling (maximum price)?

A

A price line that is below the market equilibrium.

32
Q

What major market impact would a price ceiling have?

A

It would create a shortage and excess demand.

Quantity would decrease to the quantity on the supply curve, at the price of the restriction.

33
Q

What five consequences could price ceilings have on the whole economy?

A
  • Create major shortages
  • Cause non-price rationing
  • Create or fuel an underground/parallel market - causing legal concerns.
  • Underallocation of resources
  • Negative welfare impacts (welfare losses)
34
Q

What consequences can price ceilings have on consumers, producers, workers, the government, society as a whole?

Diagram?

A

Consumers: Partly gain, partly lose. Consumers who are willing and able to buy ar a lower price are better off. However, due to shortages, not all demanders can be supplied to.

Producers: Lose out. Price ceilings limit their price and quantity supplied - reducing revenue.

Workers: Lose out. A fall in quantity supplied means that fewer workers are required for output, therefore some are made redundant and unemployment increases.

The government: No financial benefit or loss. Potentially some political gain for those that agree with the decision, but a backlash from those that disagree, or those left behind.

Society: Loses out. Deadweight loss created.

35
Q

What are underground/parallel markets?

A

Markets where the transactions aren’t officially recorded and declared - usually illegal.

36
Q

What are examples of non-price rationing?

A
  • Waiting lists/queueing.
  • Distribution of time-bound coupons.
  • Favouritism.
37
Q

What is a price floor?

A

A legally set minimum price of particular goods.

38
Q

How would you diagrammatically present a price floor?

A

A price line above market equilibrium.

39
Q

Why might a government impose price floors?

(2)

A
  1. To provide income support for farmers by offering them prices for their products that are above market-determined prices.
  2. To protect low-skilled, low-income workers by providing them with the minimum wage.
40
Q

What are five consequences of price floors (mainly agricultural) on the economy?

A
  • Major surpluses and potential waste.
  • The government must take measures to deal with surpluses.
  • Firm inefficiency
  • Overallocation of resources
  • Negative welfare impacts
41
Q

How can you diagrammatically show the impact of a price floor and the different surpluses?

A

Consumer surplus (a+b+c → a)

Producer surplus (d+e → b+d)

Welfare loss of c+e

42
Q

What consequences would a price floor have on:

  • Consumers
  • Producers
  • Workers
  • The government
  • Society as a whole
A

Consumers: Lose out. They pay a higher price for less quantity.

Producers: Gain. They receive a higher price (and greater quantity). Therefore higher revenue.

Workers: Gain. Greater output, greater employment

The government: Loses out. If buying/dealing with the excess, a greater burden on the budget.

Society as a whole: Loses out. A welfare loss is created. Overallocation of resources.

43
Q

What consequences could a minimum wage have on the economy?

(5)

A
  • Labour surplus and unemployment.
  • Illegal workers at wages below the minimum wage.
  • Misallocation of labour resources.
  • Misallocation of product markets.
  • Negative welfare impacts
44
Q

What consequences can a minimum wage have on:

  • Firms (employers of labour)
  • Workers (suppliers of labour)
  • Consumers
A

Firms: Worse off. May have to pay more for the labour, costs increase.

Workers: Some gain, some lose out. Those that retain employment gain as they now get more for their work. Those that are made redundant lost out.

Consumers: Lose out. An increase in costs (labour costs) results in a decrease in supply, causing higher prices for fewer quantities.