1.3 Expenditure minimisation Flashcards
So what is uncompensated demand ?
Uncompensated demand depends on what.
It depends on prices and income
Show uncompensated demand on a diagram what do we fix and what do we move?
We fix the budget line and income, and we move the indifference curve till we get to the highest level of Utility.
What is compensated demand?
What is compensated demand depend on?
It is dependent on prices and utlitiy.
Show compensated demand on a diagram, what do we fix and what do we move?
We fix utlitiy and the indifference curve and we are trying to get on the lowest possible budget line.
When the price of good 1 changes, the change in uncompensated demand is??
captures the subsitution and income effect.
When the price of good 1 changes, the change in compensated demand is??
captures the subsitution effect.
What is the expenditure function and what is the formula?
How does the expenditure function look on the diagram for compensated as opposed to expenditure function for uncompensated demand
to get the axes you would just divide compensate demand of the goods by their prices to get the axes.
What are some properties of the Expenditure function?
1) Increasing in Utility
2) Homogeneous of degree 1 in prices
3) Shepard’s lemma.
What does the property increasing in utility mean?
It costs more to get higher utility
What does the property Shepherds lemma mean?
If you partially differientate the expenditure function in respect to p1 and p2, you should the compensate demand for h1 and h2
Mainly how do we calculate compensated demand?
Its very similar to how we find compensated demand
Now lets do an example, what is step 1?
Now do steps 2 and 3 for this example of CB
What is the property .
Non-decreasing in price mean when looking at the cobb douglas compensated demands?
The relative price makes sense, e.g. if the price of my own good goes up, i consume less and if the price of the other good goes up, i consume more of my good.
How would we draw this compensated demand curve for Cobb douglas? ( HINT, first rearrange compensate demand for h1 to find in terms of p1)
What are the 3 steps again to find out Compensated demand?
Now draw the compensated demand curve for good 1 and tell me the properties of it?
Compensated demand can never slope upwards( in general giffen goods slope upwards( these are inferior goods, but not all inferior goods have an upward sloping demand curve, only giffen goods.
Workout the expenditure function for the cobb douglas example?
Its always p1 and p2 that have be timzed by h1 and h2 outside the bracket, and the power of p1 refers to the power of x1 and vice versa.
In the square bracket the compensated demand is the fractions are such that of h1 and h2 and the same brackets, with u outside.
What is the answer and how do we analyse this?
The answer is C, we need to understand better what is happening in the income and subsitution effects.
Lets say good 1 is sushi and good 2 is sandwiches and the price of good 1 increases, lets say the budget is as follows p1x1 + p2x2 = m, illustrate this on a diagram, show the change in uncompensated demand, and what happens to the budget line( show the gradients)
To decompose a subsitution and income effect, what do we do?
We draw a fake budget line from the original budget line and go up until it is tangent towards the original indifference curve.
Analyse the subsitution and income effect, assuming the 2 goods are normal goods?
The subsistution effect ( movement from A to B): Sushi is relatively more expensive, which causes the student to substitute away from sushi towards
sandwiches.
The income effect( movement from B to C) the purchasing power of consumer has fallen due to the fact that income has fallen, hence as both goods are normal goods, the consumption of both goods fall
What are the overall effects of the subsitution and income effects, is the answer clear for both goods, if not what do we need to have for it to be clear?
1) overall the effects are reinforcing each other for sushi ( as prices of sushi goes up, the consumer consumes less for 2 reasons 1) sushi is expensive, so subistutes away 2) the consumer feels poorer, so buys less sushi anyway. ( for sure overall effect is less sushi)
2) for sandwiches we don’t know, the substation effect says you buy more sandwiches but the income effect says you buy less sandwiches, so the effect is unknown.
Its best to draw the point C parallel and mention ambiguity
Now thinking about our pole why was C correct and is C always the case?
Because of the (negative) substitution effect, you consume a bundle which is on the same IC but not the same bundle, as you change your consumption patterns.
C isn’t always the case, as if the subsitution effect was 0 then you would need exactly £100 ( perfect complements)
For quasi linear preferences, if x1 was the good being proritised and there was an increase price of p1 ( we are assuming an interior solution, so income is enough), which affects always dominates ?
Subsitution effects always dominates, as there is no income effect for good 1.