11b – Clinical Diagnosis II Flashcards
What happens as the prevalence drops in terms of PPV and NPV?
- NPV increases to very HIGH levels
- PPV falls dramatically
What does being a member of a high risk group (high prevalence group) due to PPV of a test for that disease?
- Increases PPV
What are the best tests to RULE-OUT disease?
- Negative test with high sensitivity and NPV
What are the best tests to CONFIRM (Rule-in) disease?
- Positive test with high specificity and PPV
What can you change to get a better result?
- Can NOT change the risk group of the patient
- Can use other tools
At what values of prevalence of a disease do diagnostic tests provide the most insight?
- 40-60%
- INTERMEDIATE
What happens when prevalence decreases?
- Increased NPV
- Drops after the 40% point and then drops quickly
What happens when prevalence increases?
- Increased PPV
- Around/between 80-90: not much changes
When do diagnostic tests perform the best?
- When used in the ‘toss-up’ scenario
- *pretest probability of disease is near 50% and predictive values are maximized!
What happens if pre-test probability is very high?
- Do NOT gain much info by testing
What happens if pre-test probability is very low?
- Probably can’t justify even doing the testing
How do we optimize predictive value?
- Use in situation where pre-test probability of disease is around 50%
- After using one test, apply another more specific test to positive animals
- *use 2 test concurrently
What is parallel testing?
- 2+ different tests are performed and interpreted simultaneously
- *Animal considered positive if reacts positively to one OR both tests
- Increased sensitivity and NPV
- *more confident in negative test results
- Patient must prove it is healthy!
What is serial testing?
- Test conducted sequentially based on results of previous test
- Usually use one test, then apply a more specific test to those that test positive
- *only classified as positive IF it is positive on BOTH tests
- Maximizes specificity and improves PPV
- *patient must prove it has the condition
What is repeat testing? Negative (herd) re-testing
- Modification of serial testing
- *intermittent testing
- Test negative animals are re-tested with the same test at REGULAR INTERVALS
- Forms the basis of test and removal programs designed to eradicate disease
- Improves aggregate-level sensitivity
- Ex. Johne’s disease, Trichomoniasis, Salmonella
Example: How many preputial scrapings and cultures should we do to be fairly confident that the bully is truly negative for trichomoniasis?
- Figure out how confident you are if the test result comes up NEGATIVE
- *immunity does not actually last that long
- *need to test 3 times!
o Don’t shed consistently
Young, yearling bull (5% pre-test probability)
- 1st and 2nd test: 99% NPV
Bull (40% pre-test probability)
- Takes 3 tests to get 99% NPV
- 1st test: 90% (10% chance of losing calf crop)
- 2nd test is only taking the negative bulls
o 98% NPV
Older, mature bull (90% pre-test probability)
- Don’t get 99% NPV until 4 tests
- 1st: 41%
- *likely wouldn’t test if the pre-test probability was that high!
Parallel testing example (ex. Johne’s disease)
- Have multiple tests that could give good answers
- *increase sensitivity in final stages of eradication program
- Ex. test herd with ELISA and culture
2 signs for heat detection in dairy cows
- Mounted
- Vulvar
If you are trying to rule out a disease, what do you want your sensitivity or specificity to be? (EXAM)
- High sensitivity
- High negative predictive value
- *works best when pre-test probability of disease is LOW
- SnNOUT
If you are trying to rule in a disease, what do you want your sensitivity or specificity to be? (EXAM)
- High specificity
- High PPV
- *works best when pre-test probability of disease is HIGH
- SpPIN
What is the cost of a FALSE NEGATIVE test? (ex. exotic disease (FMD)=disastrous consequences) (EXAM)
- Highly sensitive tests, even at the cost of specificity
- Avoid FALSE NEGATIVES at all costs
- *multiple tests should be interpreted in PARALLEL
What is the cost of a FALSE POSTIVE test? (EXAM)
- High treatment costs
- Treatment that are potentially dangerous
- Euthanasia of valuable animal might be possible
- *use highly SPECIFIC tests
- *multiple tests should be interpreted in SERIES