11.1: Research Ethics ✅ Flashcards
Describe common ethical issues arising from clinical research
Breach of human rights
Autonomy/ beneficence/ justice
Confidentiality
Patients exposed to risk for no reason
Expenditure of resources
Misleading results
Lack of social value
Discuss the importance of consent and confidentiality when patients participate in research and interventions
Valid consent (capacity, voluntary, information, continuous)
Confidentiality (patients entitled to control and access over their information)
Why is published research important in academic discipline?
Allow improved scientific understanding
Benefit to society and public health
Physicians’ role
Duty of care
Researchers’ role
Generating knowledge
What are the focuses of medical research?
Disease knowledge
Patterns of disease
Treatment/vaccine/ drug development
Bio-psycho-social aspects
Legal and ethical aspects
Health systems
Nuremberg Code summary principles
(1947)
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society
- The anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment
- The experiment should be conducted so as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury
- No experiment should be conducted where there is a priori reason to believe that death/disabling injury will occur
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons
- During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end.
- The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage
Belmont Report
Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research
Belmont Report summary points
Principles:
1. Respect of persons
2. Beneficence
3. Justice
Application to the conduct of research:
1. Informed consent
-(information, comprehension, voluntariness)
2. Risk/benefit assessment
-(research justified on a favorable risk/benefit assessment)
3. Selection of subjects of research
-(fair procedures and outcomes)
VMA Declaration of Helsinki
1946
Ethics review of medical research study
Scientific grounding
Social value and contribution
Assessment of risks and benefits
Informed consent
Confidentiality
Scientific integrity and justification
Medical research using human subjects must be justifiable on scientific grounds
- WMA Medical Ethics Manual 2015
Human involvement; lack of respect for human dignity
Subjects exposure to risk for no good reason
Expenditure of resources
Misleading results
Doubting social value
Consent
Valid consent
-capacity
-information
-voluntary
-continous
Process of obtaining consent
- signed and oral explanation of the project and what participation will involve
- including that they are free to withdraw their consent to participate at any time, without any consequences or compromise of their healthcare
Researchers must ensure that the information is provided in a way that participants can understand
Confidentiality
Research subjects are entitled to confidentiality
Using data from patient records
-some data may be important but could be identifiable
-clinical case histories are unique
Communicating research results
-anonymised data
-consent for research uses etc. should be sought in advance and should be explicit consent
Vulnerable groups
Misconceiving research for therapy
Research as the only gateway to some types of medical care
Sense of duty or expression of grateful to the doctor
Fear of withdrawal of care
Assessment of Risk vs Benefits
The benefit must outweigh the risk of harm to research participants
-risk: likelihood of the occurrence and severity of the harm
-benefit: direct/indirect, benefits to others
The degree of acceptable risk partly depends on:
-whether the research study is therapeutic or non-therapeutic
Consequences for society
Degree of acceptable risk is debatable