11. Reasoning and decision making Flashcards
what do people (compared to computers) do when faced with logical problems?
Faced with logical problems, people often come to conclusions that are judged as incorrect from the perspective of formal logic and mathematics
• On the other hand, computer systems that are based on formal logic make so many silly mistakes that humans never make
what are the four areas where human irrationality is often found?
– Reasoning about conditionals
– Reasoning about quantifiers
– Reasoning about probabilities
– Decision making
What is an example deductive reasoning?
Broad to specific. Reasoning in situations where the conclusions can be determined to follow with certainty from the premises
E.g.
– Fred is the brother of Mary.
– Mary is the mother of Lisa.
THEREFORE
– Fred is the uncle of Lisa.
What is inductive reasoning
specific to broad. Reasoning in situations in which the conclusions follow only probabilistically from the premises
E.g. – Fred is the brother of Mary. – Mary is the mother of Lisa. THEREFORE – Fred is older than Lisa.
what is a conditional statement?
– If A, then B
– An assertion that if an antecedent (A) is true, then a consequent (B) must be true
what was involved in wason’s selection task?
- If a card has a vowel on one side, then it has an even number on the other side.
- If a card has a vowel on the one side, then it has an even number on the other side.
- In other words, neither a vowel nor a consonant on the other side of 4 will falsify the rule.
what were the results of Wason’s selection task?
Only 10% of participants made the right combination of choices (i.e., E and 7)
What do people have difficulty with according to Wason’s selection task?
When presented with neutral material, people have particular difficulty in recognizing the importance of exploring the negation of the consequent
what is permission schema?
Performance on the selection task can be enhanced when the material has meaningful content
e.g.
• Griggs and Cox (1982)
– If a person is drinking a beer, then the person must be over 19.
What were the results of Griggs and Cox (1982) study?
74% of the participants in Griggs and Cox (1982) selected the logically correct combination
What is the relation between Permission schema and Wason’s selection task?
When the conditional statement is interpreted as a rule about what should be the case, performance on the Wason’s selection task tends to be enhanced
Why do we perform so poorly on the original Wason’s selection task?
People tend to select cards that will be informative under a probabilistic model, not a strict logical model
– If A, then B
–> B will probably occur when A occurs
What was Oaksford and Cater (1994)’s study in Probablistic interpretation?
If a car has a broken headlight, it will have a broken taillight.
• Which cars in the parking lot would you check?
– If a car has a broken headlight, it will have a broken taillight.
– Four choices:
• Cars with broken headlights
• Cars without broken headlights
• Cars with broken taillights
• Cars without broken taillights
first and last are the logically correct choices
• Finding cars that have broken headlights would be reasonable
– There wouldn’t be many of them anyway
– If you find one, it is necessary to check its taillight
• However, do you really want to check all cars that have intact taillights?
• Cars with broken headlights/taillights are very rare
– Thus, if you find a car with a broken taillight, checking it to see whether it also has a broken headlight helps you make reasonable inference
• It is not logical, but informative choice
What do we tend to do according to probablistic interpretation?
We tend to interpret conditional statements on the basis of a
probabilistic model, not a strict logical model
– because doing so actually makes sense in many situations in real life
what might probalistic interpretation provide an explanation for?
This might be one reason why making the correct (=logical) choice in the original Wason’s selection task is sodifficult