10 - TORT - Land Flashcards

1
Q

What is private nuisance?

A

Any
- continuous activity โญ•๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
- causing substantial & unreasonable interference ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿคช๐Ÿ˜ก
- with a Cโ€™s land or their use/employment of that land๐Ÿก

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can sue for private nuisance?

A

Must have a legal interest in the land (freehold / leasehold)
๐Ÿก

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who can be sued for private nuisance?

A
  • Creator of nuisance ๐Ÿฅ
  • Occupier of land from which nuisance originates ๐Ÿ‘ซ
  • Owner of the land ๐ŸŽฉ
    E.g.
  • independent contractors (if occupier asks); ๐Ÿ‘ทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
  • trespassers/visitors/predecessors in title (occupier liable if adopt nuisance); ๐Ÿฆนโ€โ™‚๏ธ
  • naturally occurring nuisances (occupier liable where they knew & failed to take reasonable steps to abate it) ๐Ÿชฟ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the cases on who can be sued for private nuisance?
๐Ÿฅ

A
  • occupier liable for excessive noise and dust caused by contractors on his property. ๐Ÿ‘ท๐ŸŒฌ๏ธ
  • water pipe laid unlawfully beneath Dโ€™s land causing a flood. D had used pipe (adopted) and so liable. ๐Ÿชˆ๐Ÿšฐ๐ŸŒŠ
  • Lighting caused a fire, D doused fire but left embers, fire reignited and damaged Cโ€™s property. โšก๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ง๐Ÿ”ฅ
  • LL allowed a motor-sport on his land - noise was not inevitable so LL had not participated in nuisance ๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽ๏ธ๐Ÿ‘‚โŒ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When can a landlord be liable for a tenantโ€™s nuisance?

A
  • Where they authorised it, ๐Ÿ“โœ”๏ธ
  • by actively participating or ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿฅ๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽธ
  • by leasing, where there was a very high probability that leasing would create the nuisance ๐Ÿงจ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What losses are recoverable for private nuisance?
๐Ÿฅ

A
  • Property damage (more than de minimus) ๐Ÿš๏ธ
  • Sensible personal discomfort (more than fanciful & must materially interfere with ordinary human comfort) ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can a claim be made for personal injury under private nuisance?

A

No ๐Ÿก๐Ÿ ๐Ÿค•โŒ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the requirements for private nuisance?

A
  1. Indirect Interference (intangible e.g noise, fumes) ๐Ÿ’จ
  2. Recognised Damage (that is reasonable foreseeable) ๐Ÿš๏ธ๐Ÿง
  3. Continuous Act (unless a single incident caused by underlying state of affairs or for Ryland v Fletcher) โญ•๏ธ
  4. Unlawful Interference: must be unreasonable considering ordinary usage of a man living in a particular society (consider time/duration; area, abnormal sensitivity; malice; excessive behaviour)๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ๐Ÿคก
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the considerations for โ€˜Unlawful interferenceโ€™?
๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ˜ก

A
  • Time & Duration ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ
  • Locality ๐Ÿก
  • Abnormal sensitivity ๐ŸŒท
  • Malice ๐Ÿคฌ
  • Dโ€™s carelessness ๐Ÿซฃ
  • Excessive behaviour ๐Ÿคช
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the exceptions to โ€˜continuous actโ€™ required for private nuisance?

A
  • factory with metal foil strips, harm was caused in one go, but factory had been warned about leaving strips outside before.
    ๐Ÿ˜’๐Ÿญ๐Ÿ’จโšก๏ธ๐Ÿ˜ณ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the cases regarding time & location when considering โ€˜unlawful interferenceโ€™ for private nuisance? ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ๐Ÿก

A
  • motor boats = short lived so less likely to be unlawful ๐Ÿšค โฑ๏ธ
  • Sweet business in a residential area near a Doctor caused a nuisance but may not have been on an industrial estate ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฅผ๐Ÿก
  • planning permission can change the nature of the โ€˜localityโ€™ so what was a nuisance no longer is - e.g. area became a dock with heavy traffic so changed local area = no nuisance ๐Ÿ“„๐Ÿก๐Ÿšข๐Ÿšš
  • but PP for a pig pen did not change local area so smell caused nuisance. ๐Ÿ“„๐Ÿท๐Ÿ’ฉ
  • speedway with PP in a rural area still caused a nuisance.๐Ÿ“„๐Ÿก๐ŸŽ๏ธ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the cases regarding abnormal sensitivity when considering โ€˜unlawful interferenceโ€™ for private nuisance? ๐ŸŒท

A
  • Cโ€™s heat sensitive paper was ruined by the heat from Dโ€™s manufacturing business in the cellar. No nuisance as C was abnormally sensitive.
    โš™๏ธโ™จ๏ธ๐Ÿ“ฐ
  • C grew orchids, Dโ€™s factory fumes damaged plants in general so C could claim as the nuisance was caused generally (thin skull rule).
    ๐ŸŒท๐Ÿญ๐Ÿ’จ๐ŸŒฒโ˜ ๏ธ๐Ÿค•
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the cases regarding malice when considering โ€˜unlawful interferenceโ€™ for private nuisance? ๐Ÿคฌ

A

C was a music teacher who disturbed D. D made noises to get his own back. Dโ€™s malice made his interference unlawful
๐ŸŽผ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿ˜ณ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the cases regarding defendants lack of care when considering โ€˜unlawful interferenceโ€™ for private nuisance?
๐Ÿซฃ

A

Normally neighbours have to put up with a certain amount of noise dust etc. from building works. But may be unlawful if building works could have been less disruptive
๐Ÿซฃ๐Ÿ—๏ธ๐ŸŒฌ๏ธ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the cases regarding excessive behaviour when considering โ€˜unlawful interferenceโ€™ for private nuisance?
๐Ÿคช

A

D owned 100s of pheasants who damaged Cโ€™s crops - unlawful.
๐Ÿคช๐Ÿฆœ๐Ÿฆœ๐Ÿฆœ๐Ÿฆœ๐Ÿฆœ๐ŸŒพ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What defences are there for private nuisance?
๐Ÿคบ

A
  • 20 Yearsโ€™ Prescription: length of time C could have complained - no action taken within that time โŒ›๏ธ
  • Statutory Authority: where all due care has been exercised & nuisance is an inevitable consequence - oil refinery in Wales ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
  • Consent: C specifically agrees to D causing nuisance, or shown willingness ๐Ÿค
    Contributory Negligence - C consented to colliery so must have consented to coal dust๐Ÿค๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ๐ŸŒฌ๏ธ
  • Act of 3rd Party: not liable unless adopt/continue nuisance ๐Ÿฅธ
  • Act of God: not liable unless adopt/continue it ๐Ÿง”โ€โ™€๏ธ๐ŸŒฉ๏ธ
  • Necessity ๐Ÿšจ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Is โ€˜moving to the nuisanceโ€™ a defence?

A

No
๐Ÿš—๐ŸฅโŒ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What remedies are there for private nuisance?
๐Ÿฅ

A
  • Damages: where nuisance caused physical damage ๐Ÿช™
  • Injunction (most common): full or partial ๐Ÿšฆ
  • Abatement: self-help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is public nuisance?

A

Any act or omission that materially affects a class of people

๐Ÿคน๐Ÿซฅโžก๏ธ๐Ÿง•๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ’‚โ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿณ๐Ÿ‘ต๐Ÿง”โ€โ™‚๏ธ

20
Q

Who can sue for public nuisance?

A
  • An individual (who suffered special damage, over/above rest of class)
  • Local authority
  • Attorney General (where no individual action is possible)
21
Q

Who can be sued for public nuisance?

A
  • Creator of the nuisance ๐Ÿฅ
  • Any person responsible for the nuisance
22
Q

What must be satisfied for a public nuisance claim?
๐Ÿ‘ฅ๐Ÿฅ

A
  1. Act or Omission ๐Ÿคน๐Ÿซฅ
  2. One of Event or Continuous ๐Ÿงจโญ•๏ธ
  3. Class: effect must be sufficiently widespread ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿฆฑ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿฆฒ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿฆฒ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿฆฐ๐Ÿ‘ฒ
  4. Materially affects comfort & convenience (annoyance/irritation sufficient as long as itโ€™s material; loss must be reasonably foreseeable)
    ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ›‹๏ธ๐ŸŒฎ๐Ÿง
23
Q

What types of damages are recoverable for public nuisance?
๐Ÿ‘ฅ๐Ÿฅ

A
  • Personal injury ๐Ÿค•
  • Property damage ๐Ÿš๏ธ
  • Consequential econ loss ๐Ÿ’ฐ
  • Pure econ loss ๐Ÿ’ธ
24
Q

What defences are there for public nuisance?

A

same for private minus prescription
โŒโŒ›๏ธ
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
๐Ÿค
๐Ÿค๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ
๐Ÿฅธ
๐Ÿง”โ€โ™€๏ธ
๐Ÿšจ

25
What remedies are there for public nuisance?
- Damages (only for individual claims) ๐Ÿช™ - Injunction ๐Ÿšฆ
26
What is the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?
Where something escapes from D's land to C's land causing foreseeable damage ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿก๐Ÿง๐Ÿš๏ธ
27
Who can sue under Rylands v Fletcher?
Must have proprietary interest in land affected ๐Ÿก
28
Who can be sued under Rylands v Fletcher?
- Person who brings, collects & keeps the thing onto the land ๐ŸŽช - Person who has control over the land (owner/occupier) ๐Ÿ‘ซ๐ŸŽฉ
29
What damage is recoverable for Rylands v Fletcher?
- Property damage ๐Ÿš๏ธ - Consequential econ loss ๐Ÿ’ฐ
30
What are the requirements for Rylands v Fletcher?
1. C must suffer some damage ๐Ÿš๏ธ 2. D brings thing onto land & accumulates there for own purposes ๐Ÿ… 3. The thing is likely to do mischief if it escapes (must be exceptionally high risk) ๐Ÿคช๐Ÿงจ 4. Escape (can be slow, over a period of time) ๐Ÿšช 5. Escape causes foreseeable harm ๐Ÿง 6. Non-natural use of land (must be extraordinary & unusual) ๐Ÿ‘ฝ
31
what cases are there demonstrating "brings onto land" under Rylands v Fletcher?
- spread of thistles were not brought onto land ๐Ÿชป
32
what cases are there demonstrating "mischief" under Rylands v Fletcher? ๐Ÿคช๐Ÿงจ
pipe carrying water that burst was not 'exceptionally high risk' and therefore not likely to cause nuisance. ๐Ÿ’ง๐ŸชˆโŒ๐Ÿงจ
33
what cases are there demonstrating "escape" under Rylands v Fletcher? ๐Ÿšช
held tyres on his land which caught fire. Held no RvF as it was the fire that had escaped, not the tyres ๐Ÿ›ž ๐Ÿ”ฅ
34
what cases are there demonstrating "foreseeable harm" under Rylands v Fletcher? ๐Ÿง
leather chemical plant had concrete flooring. Chemicals seeped into soil causing damage to C's borehole 1.3 miles away - claim failed as not reasonably foreseeable that concrete would leak causing damage. ๐Ÿ‘ž๐Ÿ’ง๐Ÿชฃ
35
What defences are there for Rylands v Fletcher? ๐Ÿคบ
Same for public nuisance &: - statutory authority ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง - Common benefit ๐ŸŒ - Consent ๐Ÿค - Contributory negligence ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ - Act of claimant caused escape ๐Ÿค•๐Ÿšช - Act of 3rd party (unforeseeable act of a stranger over whom they had no control) ๐Ÿฅธ - Act of God (unforeseeable natural event)๐Ÿง”โ€โ™€๏ธ
36
what cases are there demonstrating "common benefit" defence under Rylands v Fletcher? ๐ŸŒ
theatre's sprinkler system went off damaging shop next door. Held that system was for benefit of shop. ๐Ÿ’ฆ๐ŸชโŒ
37
what cases are there demonstrating "act of claimant" defence under Rylands v Fletcher? ๐Ÿค•๐Ÿšช
C dug under D's canal causing a flood on C's land. ๐Ÿ‘ท๐ŸŒŠ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
38
what cases are there demonstrating "statutory authority" defence under Rylands v Fletcher? ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
D was under an obligation to lay a high pressure water pipe. No liability when it burst. ๐Ÿ“„๐Ÿชˆ๐ŸŒŠ
39
what cases are there demonstrating "act of god" defence under Rylands v Fletcher? ๐Ÿง”โ€โ™€๏ธ
D had pools on his land, v. heavy rain caused them to burst damaging C's bridges. No liability as rain act of nature that was unforeseeable ๐ŸŠโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐ŸŒง๏ธ๐ŸŒŠ๐ŸงโŒ
40
What remedies are there for Rylands v Fletcher?
- Damages ๐Ÿช™ - Injunction ๐Ÿšฆ
41
Who can sue under tresspass?
Must have a legal interest in the land. ๐Ÿก If leased/licenced, must be the lessee/licensee that sues. LL can only sue if it affects him beyond the term of the lease. ๐Ÿ‘ซโœ… ๐ŸŽฉโŒ
42
Is damage required to sue in Tresspass?
No
43
What is required from tresspass?
- direct physical interference ๐Ÿ‘ท - Intention ๐Ÿ’ก
44
What is required for 'intention' for trespass?
The intention of carrying out the trespassing act (e.g. walking over a field), not necessarily the intention to trespass. ๐Ÿšถโ€โ™‚๏ธ
45
What are the defences for trespass?
- Permission ๐Ÿค - Legal authority ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง - Necessity ๐Ÿšจ
46
when must a claim for trespass be made?
within 6 years of the date of action
47
what are the cases for trespass
- shop sign invaded airspace ๐Ÿชง - extractor fan at 4.5m invade airspace ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿณ - areal photos not invading airspace ๐Ÿ“ธ - oil wells under persons' house ๐Ÿ›ข๏ธ