10 Specific Factors Flashcards
Specific factors model
- Two products and two inputs (e.g. labor and capital)
- One or both of the inputs cannot move across sectors
- Both: Pure specific factors model
- One: Mixed specific factors model (Ricardo-Viner model)
How can factors be specific to the industry?
- Short-run focus
- Barriers to mobility (geographic, technological, regulatory)
Average US tariffs (1790 - 1840)
In a Ricardian-type, comparative-advantage economy, there’d be no conflict over trade policy. Conflict can then be understood as a result of _____
In a Ricardian-type, comparative-advantage economy, there’d be no conflict over trade policy. Conflict can then be understood as a result of specific factors.
- Specific factors in North (manufacturing) gain from tariff.
- Specific factors in South (agriculture) loses from tariff.
Equilibrium in a pure specific-factors model
North: LN workers, KN units of capital.
Perfect competition, so nominal wages equal to the value of the marginal product of labor:
wN = pC MPLC(LN, KN).
→ factor prices will adjust so that demand for labor and capital equals (the fixed) supply.
Similar for the price of capital services:
rN = pC MPKC(LN, KN).
The impact of a tariff in a pure-specific-factors model
Assume that the US market is relatively small, so that pC and pT are determined on world markets.
Then a 50% tariff on C will increase pC by 50%. Both wN and rN increase by 50% when pC increases by 50%.
Therefore, both workers and capitalists in the North benefit from the tariff.
Neither wS nor rS increases because of the tariff, since pT is unchanged. (Why is pT unchanged?). Therefore, Southern factors’ nominal incomes are unchanged, even as the price of cloth goes up.
Real incomes of owners of Southern factors fall due to the tariff.
An unrealistic feature of the pure specific-factors model
- When tariff goes up, what happens to the allocation of labor to the cloth industry? Nothing.
- Therefore, what happens to output in the cloth industry? Nothing.
The Ricardo-Viner model
Mixed Specific-Factors Model
Labor mobility. Capital/land still fixed.
- A single wage w for the whole country
- rs and rN still different
Equilibrium given by:
pCMPLC(LC, KC) = w
pTMPLT(LT, KT) = w
L = LC + LT
Equilibrium in the Ricardo-Viner model / Mixed Specific-Factors Model
Equilibrium given by:
pCMPLC(LC, KC) = w
pTMPLT(LT, KT) = w
L = LC + LT
The Ricardo-Viner model: Capital income
- Area under pCMPLC curve equals pCQC
- Subtract wage bill, wLC, to get income to Northern capitalists
The Ricardo-Viner model: Effects of tariff
- Shifts the pC MPLC curve up everywhere proportionally (by 50%).
- Wage w goes up.
- LC goes up, LT goes down. QC goes up, QT goes down.
Cloths:
Workers & capitalists gain nominally
Tobacco:
Workers gain, land owners lose, nominally
Suppose w increased by 50%. Then, weages goes up by less than 50 %.
The Ricardo-Viner model:
Effects of tariff to workers’ budget lines
w has increased because of the tariff; but w/pC has fallen because of the tariff. This is the cloth intercept of the workers’ budget line.
Since pT is unchanged, w/pT has risen due to the tariff. This is the tobacco intercept of the workers’ budget line.
The Ricardo-Viner model:
Effects of tariff: Income of Northern capitalists
Recall that
rN = pCMPKC(LN, KN)
We have pC ↑ by 50% and MPKC ↑, hence rN up by more than 50%.
Real capital income rNKN/pC and rNKN/pT also rises.
The Ricardo-Viner model:
Effects of tariff: Income of Southern landowners
Land income is
rSAS = pTQT − wLT
- Sales down and wage costs higher → nominal land income down.
- Then, rSAS/pT and rSAS/pC also down.
- Budget line shifts in.
The Ricardo-Viner model:
Factors _____ are unambiguously hurt by the tariff.
The Ricardo-Viner model:
Factors specific to the export sector are unambiguously hurt by the tariff.