10 Specific Factors Flashcards

1
Q

Specific factors model

A
  • Two products and two inputs (e.g. labor and capital)
  • One or both of the inputs cannot move across sectors
    • Both: Pure specific factors model
    • One: Mixed specific factors model (Ricardo-Viner model)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can factors be specific to the industry?

A
  • Short-run focus
  • Barriers to mobility (geographic, technological, regulatory)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Average US tariffs (1790 - 1840)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In a Ricardian-type, comparative-advantage economy, there’d be no conflict over trade policy. Conflict can then be understood as a result of _____

A

In a Ricardian-type, comparative-advantage economy, there’d be no conflict over trade policy. Conflict can then be understood as a result of specific factors.

  • 􏰀 Specific factors in North (manufacturing) gain from tariff.
  • 􏰀 Specific factors in South (agriculture) loses from tariff.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Equilibrium in a pure specific-factors model

A

North: LN workers, KN units of capital.

Perfect competition, so nominal wages equal to the value of the marginal product of labor:

wN = pC MPLC(LN, KN).

→ factor prices will adjust so that demand for labor and capital equals (the fixed) supply.

Similar for the price of capital services:

rN = pC MPKC(􏰃LN, KN).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The impact of a tariff in a pure-specific-factors model

A

Assume that the US market is relatively small, so that pC and pT are determined on world markets.

Then a 50% tariff on C will increase pC by 50%. Both wN and rN increase by 50% when pC increases by 50%.

Therefore, both workers and capitalists in the North benefit from the tariff.

Neither wS nor rS increases because of the tariff, since pT is unchanged. (Why is pT unchanged?). Therefore, Southern factors’ nominal incomes are unchanged, even as the price of cloth goes up.

Real incomes of owners of Southern factors fall due to the tariff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

An unrealistic feature of the pure specific-factors model

A
  • When tariff goes up, what happens to the allocation of labor to the cloth industry? Nothing.
  • Therefore, what happens to output in the cloth industry? Nothing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model

A

Mixed Specific-Factors Model
Labor mobility. Capital/land still fixed.

  • A single wage w for the whole country
  • rs and rN still different

Equilibrium given by:

pCMPLC(LC, KC) = w

pTMPLT(LT, KT) = w

L = LC + LT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Equilibrium in the Ricardo-Viner model / Mixed Specific-Factors Model

A

Equilibrium given by:

pCMPLC(LC, KC) = w

pTMPLT(LT, KT) = w

L = LC + LT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model: Capital income

A
  • Area under pCMPLC curve equals pCQC
  • Subtract wage bill, wLC, to get income to Northern capitalists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model: Effects of tariff

A
  • Shifts the pC MPLC curve up everywhere proportionally (by 50%).
  • Wage w goes up.
  • LC goes up, LT goes down. QC goes up, QT goes down.

Cloths:
Workers & capitalists gain nominally

Tobacco:
Workers gain, land owners lose, nominally

Suppose w increased by 50%. Then, weages goes up by less than 50 %.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model:

Effects of tariff to workers’ budget lines

A

w has increased because of the tariff; but w/pC has fallen because of the tariff. This is the cloth intercept of the workers’ budget line.

Since pT is unchanged, w/pT has risen due to the tariff. This is the tobacco intercept of the workers’ budget line.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model:

Effects of tariff: Income of Northern capitalists

A

Recall that

rN = pCMPKC(􏰃LN, KN)

We have pC ↑ by 50% and MPKC􏰂 ↑, hence rN up by more than 50%.

Real capital income rNKN/pC and rNKN/pT also rises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model:

Effects of tariff: Income of Southern landowners

A

Land income is

rSAS = pTQT − wLT

  • Sales down and wage costs higher → nominal land income down.
  • Then, rSAS/pT and rSAS/pC also down.
  • Budget line shifts in.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model:

Factors _____ are unambiguously hurt by the tariff.

A

The Ricardo-Viner model:

Factors specific to the export sector are unambiguously hurt by the tariff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Ricardo-Viner model:

Factors _____ unambiguously benefit from the tariff.

A

Factors specific to the import-competing sector unambiguously benefit from the tariff.

17
Q

A full trade model

A
  • Introduce a second country with differences in productivity
  • Drop the small economy assumption => prices endogenous
18
Q

Autarky vs. a full trade model:

RS- & RD-curve

A
  • As before, wages equals the marginal product of labor in each sector
  • This must mean that LC/LT is (an increasing) function of pC/pT.
  • This must mean that QC/QT is (an increasing) function of pC/pT => RS curve

Autarky:

  • 􏰀 Europe RS curve to the right of US RS curve.
  • 􏰀 Identical RD curve → pC/pT lower in Europe.

Trade:

  • pC/pT must rise in Europe.
  • 􏰀Supply > Demand → Exports of C from Europe.
19
Q

Aggregate welfare in autarky vs full trade model: Europe

A