10. Problem Solving Flashcards
What are the 3 main aspects of problem solving?
1) Goal-directed
2) Involves deliberate controlled processes
3) Problem exists when the solver lacks relevant knowledge to produce an immediate solution.
What are 4 main types of problems?
Well-defined vs Ill defined problems
Knowledge-rich vs knowledge lean problems
What is the difference between well-defined and ill-defined problems?
Well-defined problems are clearly specified
- initial state
- possible strategies and steps
- goal (clear when goal is reached)
Ill defined problems are underspecified
- infinite strategies
- hard to know which strategy is more effective
- not clear if goal is reached
What is the difference between knowledge-rich vs knowledge-lean problems? Cognitive research is usually done on which type of problem and why?
knowledge-rich: need relevant knowledge to solve.
Knowledge-lean: don’t need relevant knowledge because all the information required to solve the problem is already in the question.
knowledge-lean problems because this minimizes individual differences in relevant knowledge.
The Monty hall problem is an example of a _____ problem.
Well-defined
What is the optimal solution to the Monty Hall problem?
Switch your choice! You have a 2/3 chance of being correct if you switch your choice. Raise accuracy from 50% –> 66.6%
What heuristic do people use when solving the Monty Hall problem?
Uniformity fallacy - the assumption that all available options are equally likely, whether true or not.
The Monty Hall problem places substantial demands on which part of WM?
Central executive (Attention-like component) Most people find it hard to think about causality and mistakenly believe that the host’s actions are random. But actually it is not! The host opens the door containing the goat! Not just any door.
What is functional fixedness? (Duncker)
Observed when we fail to solve problems because we assume from past experience that an object has only a limited number of uses.
Participants were given a candle, a match box containing matches, some tacks, and some other objects. Participants’ task was to attach the candle to a wall by a table so it didn’t drip onto the table below. What is the correct answer? What do the results of this study show?
Stick the candle onto the match box then light the candle. The match box will function as a candle holder. Use the tacks to nail the box to the wall. Dripping wax will drip into the box. Shows functional fixedness as most participants cannot see the function of the matchbox as a platform.
When people have very limited experience with an object, does this change their level of functional fixedness?
No. People still show significant functional fixedness despite limited experience with the object.
In the candle functional fixedness experiment, why is the success rate much higher when the items given are underlined?
the underlinings led participants to pay more attention to the objects, and thus focused more directly on the key objects involved in the problem solution.
Participants were asked to decide whether each of 9 objects could be used for a given function. Immediately after, they decided whether the same objects could be used for a different function. Some objects could be used for both functions. What were the findings of this study?
Deciding that an possessed the first function significantly reduced the probability of detecting that it also possessed the second function. Suggests functional fixedness.
What is a mental set?
A tendency to approach problems in a way that proved successful in the past
Why is it useful to form a mental set?
So that successive problems can be solved faster with fewer processing demands.
Briefly describe Luchin’s Water Jar problems and how does it demonstrate the persistence of the mental set?
Jar A - 28 quarts
Jar B - 76 quarts
Jar C - 3 quarts
Must end up with exactly 25 quarts in one of the jars. Simple solution. (A-C)
The next few problems also require the same solution, just different numbers. So participants develop a mental set. When there was an easier solution in one of the new problems, many participants didn’t see the solution, The successive, repetitious use of the same method mechanised many subjects, and blinded them to the possibility of a more direct and simple solution.
Describe Levine’s AB task.
Task was to work out the experimenter’s hypothesis.
On each trial, participant said “A” or “B”. Experimenter will indicate whether this was correct.
First few problems, the solution involved a position sequence (eg. 1st trial – letter on the left was correct; 2nd trial – letter on the right was correct)
After several problems, the pattern changed to a simple one not involving a position sequence:
‘A’ was always correct and ‘B’ was always incorrect.
about 80% of university students failed to solve this problem within 100 trials!!
Are experts immune from the damaging effects of mental set?
Nope. Expert chess players were asked to find the shortest way to win. Familiar strategy (5 moves) vs less common strategy (3 moves). Many couldn’t find the shorter solution. Eye movements showed they were still looking at the positions related to the first familiar solution. First solution still directed their attentional processes.
What is the difference between “grind-out-the-answer” problems and insight problems?
“grind-out-the-answer” – Work structurally through the problem until we reach a solution
insight problems – “Aha” experience involving a sudden transformation of the problem; Eureka effect
What are rebus problems and what are the 2 types of rebus problems?
eg. BIG bad wolf.
Contain visual and verbal cues to solve a familiar phrase. 2 types: depend on 1 principle vs depend on 2 principles. Most people take longer to solve rebus problems that depend on two principles as they require 2 separate insights.
Board is initially covered by 32 dominoes occupying 2 squares each (black + white). Then two (black) squares from diagonally opposite corners are removed. Can the remaining 61 squares be filled by 31 dominoes? What is the solution for this mutilated checkerboard problem?
Each domino covers 1 white and 1 black square. The 2 squares removed are both black! So the 31 dominoes can’t cover the mutilated board!
A sudden restructuring of the problem (insight) allows us to form the __________.
correct problem representation
What is the difference between insight and non-insight problems?
Non-Insight problems: Progressive increase of “warmth” (closeness to solution). Involve sequence of processes.
Insight-problems: Warmth remains at low level until just before a solution is reached then it dramatically increases.
When solving remote association problems, the anterior superior temporal gyrus was activated when the answers involved ________.
insight
The right anterior superior temporal gyrus was vital to producing insight because?
it is involved in processing general semantic (meaning) relationships
What did event-related potentials (ERPs) show just before participants reached an insightful solution?
Burst of high-frequency brain activity ⅓ second before participants indicated they had achieved an insightful solution.
What is one evidence to show the role of the right hemisphere in insight?
Before solving the remote associate problems, participants were shown either the solution or an unrelated word presented to left or right hemisphere. Participants responded much faster when word was presented to right hemisphere. Integration of weakly active and distant associations occurs mostly in right hemisphere. Such processing is very relevant for producing insight. In contrast, strong activation of closely related associations occurs mostly in the left hemisphere.
Working memory is more important for _____ problems than _____ ones
analytic
insight
When partial information was available, then the time needed to produce an insight solution ______ .
decreases
Underlying processes involved in insight are typically ______ and involve ________.
unconscious
recombining different representations
What is representational change theory in aiding insight?
Changing the problem representation for insight to occur in 3 ways:
1) constraint relaxation - Inhibitions on what is regarded as permissible are removed
2) re-encoding - Some aspect of problem representation is reinterpreted
(required in the mutilated checkerboard problem)
3) elaboration - New information is added to the representation