1. Law and Legal Systems Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is English common Law and Countries it applies?

A

English common law is one of the major legal systems in the world. Adopted in US and most old Commonwealth countries, including part of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and many states in Africa and the Far East.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Civil Law and Countries it applies?

A

Civil law which is based on the laws of ancient Rome.. Dominates continental Europe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Public Law?

A
  • Public law is concerned with the legal structure of the State and relationships between the State and individuals.
  • It also governs the relationship between one State and another.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Categories of Public Law

A
  • constitutional law
  • administrative law
  • criminallaw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Constitutional Law

A

-structure of the main institutions of gov and their relationship including the relationship between the two Houses of Parliament in the UK and central and locall e.g defined treaties, roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Administrative Laws

A
  • relationship between private citizens and agencies of government, and the impact of their activities on ordinary individuals
  • e.g taxation, health
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Criminal Law

A

-concerned with the control of behaviour which harms or threatens the peace and stability of the community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Private Law ( civil law)?

A

-governs the relationships between legal persons e.g individuals, businesses and other organisations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Branches of Private law (6)

A
  • law of contract
  • law of tort
  • law of trusts
  • law of property
  • law of succession
  • family law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are 6 characteristic of English law?

A
  • age and continuity - long history & developed without interruption over 900 years
  • little codification
  • judge-made law -decisions of judges to become part of the law
  • independence of the judiciary (free from politics)
  • adversarial system;
  • no written constitution
  • rule of law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Examples of codificationof English Law

A

-Fair proportion of the criminal law. -Under civil law relating to partnerships, the sale of goods, bills of exchange and marine insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adversarial system Vs inquisitorial system

A
  • Adversarial: Court remains neutral .The role of the court is not to investigate but simply to listen to the evidence presented by the two sides and then give judgment.
    The only courts in England which employ an inquisitorial procedure are the Coroners’ Courts, which inquire into cases of violent, unnatural or suspicious death.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain development of Common law

A
  • Prior 1066 there was no single system of law - Justice was based on local customs which often varied from place to place.
  • After Norman’s conquest 1066, central royal courts developed
  • Travelling judges were sent by the King to monitor local administration
  • The court of chancery in 1474 was created to deal with those dissatisfied with the common law. It was presided by lord chancellor
  • The rules applied were of equity- fairness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain development of Equity law?

A
  • By 1500s, the Court of Chancery’s influence was widespread n became a threat to common law courts.
  • The conflict between the two systems came to a head in the Earl of Oxford’s case (1616).
  • This resulted in a ruling if there was a conflict between common law and equity, equity should prevail.
  • In 1600s court of chancery began to follow it’s on precedents
  • The Judicature Acts 1873–75 amalgamated the common law courts and Court of Chancery in a single system called the Supreme Court of Judicature (now named the Senior Courts of England and Wales)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sources of new law (5)

A
  1. Legislation
  2. Precedent or case law
  3. local custom- not common
  4. Legal books n treatises
  5. European Community law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define legislation

A
  • Also known as statute law
  • created in formal way n set in writing
  • Parliament makes the rules
  • House of commons, house of lords, the monarch
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define Green paper and White Paper

A
  • Green Paper is published by gov inviting responses to proposed changes in the law.
  • White Paper maybe published to give advance notice of more definite proposals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define Public and Private bills

A
  • Bills may be Public or Private. If they pass into law they become known as Public or Private Acts.
  • A Public Act is a law affecting the whole community, such as the TheftActs
  • A Private Act benefits a particular individual or organisation.
  • Examples of Private Acts Lloyd’s Act 1982 and Insurance Brokers (Registration) Act 1977
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Private member’s bill

A

Bills which are introduced by individual Members of Parliament rather than by the Government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Procedure for the enactment of public bills

A
  1. may be introduced at House of commons or lords. Assume it’s is at commons
  2. Bill goes through Stages- first reading , second reading ( debating and voting), committee stage (amendments may be done), report stage to the house ,third reading ( final opportunity to debate)
  3. Bill moves to house of lords
  4. Bill receives royal assent comes into force. It is then referred to an act or statute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Consolidating Acts

A

A consolidating Act is one which repeals all previous legislation on a subject and re-enacts it in one logically arranged statute.

No new law is created but existing statutory enactments are brought under one ‘umbrella’. Examples

the Road Traffic Act 1988; and
the European Parliament and Council Directive 2009/103/EC consolidated 5 previous acts

22
Q

Codifying Acts

A

This is when gov decides to include principles embodied in case law. As a result most or, in some cases, all the law on a particular topic, including existing statute and case law is reduced to a single code. Examples Marine Insurance Act 1906 – consolidated previous legislation on marine insurance with legal principles contained in around 2,000 decided cases.

23
Q

Role of the Law Commission

A
  • The Law Commission is responsible for the consolidation and revision of statute law.
  • reviewing English law and recommending ways in which it can be updated, simplified and developed in a systematic wa
24
Q

Retroactive legislation

A

Retroactive legislation is legislation which affects acts done or rights acquired before it came into effect.

25
Q

Delegated legislation

A

Acts of Parliament which lay down general rules often confer on persons or bodies (particularly Government Ministers) the power to make detailed rules and regulations for the purpose of implementing the Act.

Acts which confer such power are called Enabling Acts (or Parent Acts) and rules made under the authority of these Acts are known as delegated or subordinate legislation.

Forms statutory instruments, orders in council, bye laws

26
Q

What are the aids of interpretation of statutes used by judges?

A
  1. Statutory aids
  2. Common law rules
    - literal rule (takes precedence)
    - golden rule
    - mischief rule- meaning inlight of mischief
    - presumptions
27
Q

Court system Diagram

A

Check screen shot

28
Q

What is precedent and how it evolved?

A

Precedent is a decision in a previous legal case where the facts were similar to the case before the court.
-Prevuously it was persuasive but as printing and law developed, By 1800, it had been accepted that regard must be paid to previous decisions, and that it was not for the courts to reject them

29
Q

Principle of Ratio Decidendi ( reason for deciding)

A

-the material facts of the case
-the decision if the judge/judges
-the reason for the decision
.Binding precedent means that the judge is obliged to follow the ratio decidendi of previous similar cases from courts higher than their own or in some cases of equal standing

30
Q

Obiter dicta

A
  • Statements made by a judge which are not essential to the decision.
  • They are not part of ratio Decidendi, nor binding but may be persuasive.
31
Q

Operations of binding precedent- civil courts

A
  1. Supreme court-decisions here are binding on all lower courts. It is not bound by its own decision (1966)
  2. Court of appeal- binding on high court and county court. It is bound by its own decision
  3. High court- binding on inferior courts, but not on other high courts. The decisions of Divisional Courts are binding on judges of the High Court sitting alone, and on Magistrates’ Courts, but not on the Crown Courts.
  4. County courts - are bound by all decisions of the higher courts.
32
Q

Operations of binding precedent- criminal law

A
  1. Supreme court-decisions here are binding on all lower courts. Since 1966 It is not bound by its own decision but very rare.
  2. Court of appeal- Decisions are binding on the Crown and Magistrates’ Courts. The court is normally bound by its own decisions, although it is more flexible than the Civil Division.
  3. Crown court -Decisions are not binding on any court and are, at most, persuasive.
  4. Magistrate courts - are bound by all decisions of the higher courts.except that they are not bound by the decision of a Crown Court hearing appeals from Magistrates’ Courts.
33
Q

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

A
  • final court of appeal from some Commonwealth countries and overseas territories.
  • Lost importance as countries have left common wealth or established supreme court with no appeals
34
Q

Define

  1. reversing
  2. over ruling
  3. disapproving
  4. Distinguishing
A

Reversing- If a person, A, loses a case against another, B but then appeals successfully the decision in the first hearing is said to be reversed.

Overruling - where a higher court cancels out the principle of law contained in the ratio decidendi of the earlier case and substitutes a new one

Disapproving-decision is said to be disapproved when a court offers the opinion that an earlier case is wrongly decided but is not in a position to overrule it.

Distinguishing-occurs when a court declines to follow a previous decision on the grounds that there are important points of difference in the case which has gone before it

35
Q

Examples of persuasive precedents ( non binding)

A
  • Decisions made in lower courts or courts of equal standing.
  • Decisions of courts outside the English system (e.g. Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Irish, Scottish, Commonwealth and United States Courts).
  • Obiter dicta (especially of senior judges in high-level decisions).
  • Textbooks, learned treaties and the law of other jurisdictions (e.g. Roman law) – these sources are very rarely used
36
Q

Advantages of Precedent

A
  • Precedent provides certainty for persons as to their rights and liabilities.
  • possibility of development and growth, with precedents that can be extended to new situations.
  • Where a precedent will lead to a nonsensical decision, its scope can be restricted by the process of distinguishing. This provides an element of flexibility in the law
  • it gives English law a wealth of detailed practical rulings, based on real situations rather than legal theory.
37
Q

Disadvantages of Precedent

A
  • Once a rule has been laid down as binding it is not easy to change – this creates rigidity in the system.Change can be made by Parliament, through legislation, or being overruled by a higher court.
  • The bulk and complexity of case law makes it difficult to navigate, and so the system depends heavily on expertise between the lawyers.
  • The system of precedent may be slower than desired in development. It depends entirely upon litigation for rules to emerge.
  • The principle of law contained in some decisions is sometimes obscure eg the ratio Decidendi may be unclear
38
Q

Sources of law reports

A
  1. The council of law (1865) publish annual and weekly law report from the cases under high court and court of appeal
  2. All England reports (1936)
  3. Specialist law reports eg Lloyds report
  4. Newspapers- times, Guardian
  5. Online- ilaw, Westlaw, nexislexis
39
Q

European Treaties

A
  • The Treaty of Rome 1957 established the European Economic Community (EEC) which aimed to set up a large European ‘free trade area’.
    2. The Maastricht Treaty is officially known as the Treaty of the European Union. It was signed in Maastricht on 7 February 1992 and came into force on 1 November 1993. The Maastricht Treaty created the European Union (EU)
    3. With the passing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, the EC was eliminated and the Treaty of Rome that had established it was formally renamed the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
40
Q

Institutions of the European Union

A
  1. Council
  2. Commission
  3. European parliament
  4. Court of justice
41
Q

European Community law

A

European Union law had been a major source of law for the UK. But the ECA 1972 was repealed by EUWA. The retained EU law is part of the UK domestic law but the UK may amend such rules. But please note the Northern Ireland Protocol as mentioned above.

42
Q

situations an insurer is involved in court proceedings

A
  1. They may become involved in disputes about taxation or matters of company law, or about the buildings and other property that they own.
  2. They may need to go to court to settle a dispute with their own employees about pay, working conditions, pension rights or other employment-related matters
  3. Disputed claims between the insurer and policyholder
  4. Disputes between insurers e.g insurers and reinsurers
  5. Cases in which insurance companies are seeking to defend their own policyholders, who are themselves being sued for compensation by third parties, that is, liability insurance claims
43
Q

Elements of Civil Procedure

A
  • The Civil Procedure Rules (arising out of the Woolf reforms 1996) set out the procedure that civil cases follow before and at court.
  • The pre-action protocols list actions that both parties to a dispute are required to take before legal action is started.
  • If the case is not settled during the protocol period it may be issued at court.
  • The court will allocate the case to one of three tracks: the small claims track for cases under £10,000 or for personal injury claims with a general damages element of less than £1,000; the fast track for cases not over £25,000; the multi track for cases over £25,000 or more complex cases.
  • Either party may make an offer of settlement to the other party; if the offer is made as a Part 36 offer or payment then there may be cost consequences if it is not accepted.
  • Litigation can be very costly; conditional fee agreements and before-the-event or after-the-event insurance can assist but since April 2013 there have been significant changes to funding of civillitigation.
44
Q

Woolf report made 303 recommendations. Give examples of 6

A
  • 3 separate ‘tracks’ for cases, depending on their value and complexity.
  • Encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution
  • Giving judges more responsibility for managing cases.
  • Use of information technology.
  • Simplifying documents and procedures and having a single set of rules for proceedings in both the High Court and County Court.
  • Shorter timetables for cases to reach court and for the length of trials
45
Q

What is a part 36 offer

A

A Part 36 offer or payment is essentially an attempt to force the other party into a compromise

46
Q

Solicitor

A

Solicitors offer professional advice on all kinds of legal matters, from buying a home or matters of family law to major commercial deals, such as the selling of a major corporation.

Solicitors can also represent their clients in court. They do this mainly in the lower courts but some solicitors apply for and obtain advocacy rights in the higher courts.

Most solicitors work in private practice. Their businesses vary in size

47
Q

Barrister

A

Barristers act on instructions from solicitors and often have little direct contact with members of the public.

They perform two main roles. First, when specialist expertise is needed they give opinions on complex matters of law. Second, when clients need representation in the higher courts (i.e. the Crown Courts, High Courts, Courts of Appeal and Supreme Court) barristers provide a specialist advocacy service.

48
Q

Describe legal personality?

A

The law divides persons generally into two broad categories: natural persons and juristic persons (or corporations).

Special rules apply to the capacity of minors, persons lacking mental capacity and bankrupts.

Different status eg marriage will impose particular obligations and give particular rights.

Corporations can be either:

corporations sole – a legal person representing an official position which will be occupied by a series of different people (such as the Monarch); or
corporations aggregate – a legal person consisting of a number of people.
Corporations aggregate may be created by Royal Charter, private Act of Parliament or by registration under the Companies Acts.
Unincorporated associations are groups of people who have not been incorporated in the same way as corporations. They range in size and importance.

49
Q

How are minors treated differently?

A
  • Because minors are inexperienced in contracts, there are special rules to protect minors who enter into contracts.
  • In the law of torts, minors are usually fully responsible for their acts. However, parties will generally find it difficult to recover compensation from a minor, due to the lack of legally owned assets
  • A minor cannot own a house outright, but can do so indirectly as a beneficiary under a trust.
  • Full criminal responsibility applies in England and Wales in the case of minors over the age of ten, although the legal procedures followed and punishments employed differ from those used for adults. Children under the age of ten are presumed incapable of committing a crime
  • Minors involved in civil litigation must sue through a ‘next friend’, i.e. an adult who is primarily responsible for any costs awarded against the minor.
  • Minors cannot vote, marry, sit in jury
50
Q

How are person lacking mental capacity treated

A
  • treated as responsible for tortious acts, although this may not be the case where the act requires a particular type of mental capacity which the person is incapable of forming (e.g. deception).
  • the person may need to have a representative to carry out some activities, such as someone with a lasting power of attorney to handle the transfer of any property, or a litigation friend to act for them in civil litigation.
51
Q

What rights do bankrupt people lose

A
  • sitting in either House of Parliament;
  • becoming a member of a local council;
  • acting as a magistrate;
  • acting as a company director;
  • obtaining credit over a certain amount.
52
Q

List the principles and remedies which equity has given to our legal system?

A
  • law of trusts – a trust is a legal relationship created (in lifetime or on death) by a settlor through which assets are placed under the control of a trustee either for the benefit of a beneficiary or a specified purpose;
  • specific performance – a court order compelling a person to carry out a promise which they have given to another; and
  • injunction – a court order compelling a person to do something or prohibiting them from doing something.
  • principles of promissory estoppel -the rule that a promise can be enforceable by law, where the promisee relies on that promise to their detriment.
  • insurance principles of subrogation and contribution