1. Introduction Flashcards
Why is behavioural science important?
- easy to assume things are as they seem or as you think
- assumptions are untested theories - need to put them to rigorous scientific tests
- allows dentists to believe in facts rather than opinions
How is behavioural science subjective?
- humans study human behaviour
- can’t separate ourselves from the study
- base expectations and beliefs on experiences we’ve had
- diversity is so important - need to be explicit about assumptions our models and approaches are based on
Explain the behaviour iceberg theory
- observable behaviour is a small part of the experience
- we can see behaviours and results but not the beliefs, values, thinking and emotions that have led to it
- need to be tentative and open to questioning
How can a dentist engage with behavioural science?
- ask what are my assumptions?
- what theories are there?
- what is the evidence?
- how can i test and apply my theories and evidence to a dental context?
2 models of communication skills
- active listening
- motivational interviewing
Advantages of both active listening and motivational interviewing
- both emphasise importance of cultivating a mutually respectful relationship
- makes it clear you are listening
- both frequently taught to staff groups in clinical care
What did Wendy Levinson find about doctor patient interactions?
- doctors who have never been sued spend 18.3 mins on average with patients, orienting comments such as first, i will examine you then discuss any cocnerns etc and use active listening such as tell me more about that
- doctors who have been sued at least twice spend 15 minutes on average, have less patient-centred style but still provide same quality info and level of detail
Procedure for Wendy Levinson’s research
- observers watched 4-10 second clips from doctor-patient conversations which were content-filtered and were asked to rate warmth, hostility, dominance and anxiousness
- on basis of this, could reliably predict which doctors would get sued
- most imp quality was dominance (sued group) versus concern (not sued group)
What did Moore find out about dental anxiety?
- in 1993, in a Danish population of 208 ps
- 122 feared the whole process/feeling of powerlessness
- 106 feared drilling/sound
- 62 feared pain in treatment
- 45 feared needle
- subset of 80 ps were interviewed and commented that dentists should not make condescending remarks, act in dominant manner, appear too busy, not stop for pain, not talk at all, not explain things or use technical dental language
What social impact of dentistry are people scared of? (Moore)
- 53/80 - 66% - of interviewed subset described being socially embarassed about dental fear problem and inability to do something about it
- most reported it had an impact on condition and appearance of teeth
How did the dental fear come about? (Moore)
- 66/80 had traumatic dental experience (usually in childhood)
- in 20/80, was pain
- 24 were being held down
- 32 ‘hard-handed dentists’
- 13 couldn’t isolate a reason
What does Armfield say causes dental fear?
- some people with traumatic dental experimental experiences do not end up with dental fear
- some people with dental fear did not have a traumatic experience
- in a survey of 1084 Australian adults, perceptions of dental treatment that it’s unpredictable, uncontrollable, dangerous and disgusting are more predictive of fear than previous dental experiences
What is the vicious cycle of dental fear?
- dental fear and anxiety
- leads to delayed visiting
- leads to dental problems
- leads to symptom-driven treatment
- leads back to dental fear and anxiety
- evidence shows interaction between patient and dentist when they do attend treatment is important
From Calladine, Currie and Penlington, going to the dentist worries me because …
- even though my teeth feel okay, i don’t know if they will tell me there is something wrong (63% agree)
- makes me worry my teeth are bad (61%)
- makes me feel vulnerable (54%)
- painful experience (39%)
According to Clladine, Currie and Penlington, it would be helpful if the dentist …
- would tell me the condition of all my teeth, not just those that need treatment (86%)
- had a conversation with me at start of appointment about what will happen (82%)
- explained the meaning of the codes they’re using to assess my teeth (71%)
Process of Calladine, Currie and Penlington
- survey of 154 members of British Public
- questions generated by interviews with 5 people about feelings re. dental appointments
Main themes through Calladine, Currie and Penlington
- control
- shame
- discomfort
- cost
- long-term impact
Scientist Practioner Method
- don’t make assumptions
- use systematic methods to test out different theories and methods of intervention
- learn from outcomes of investigations
- report investigations in detail so others can repeat same procedure
- many professions work with scientist practitioner model. highly relevant to behavioural science as human behaviours and interactions can be very subtle and obvious
- consistent with reflective practice, a key aspect of dental professionalism
Medical Model of Care
- dominant philosophy of thinking about health and illness which dominates much medical care offered in Western cultures today
- diagnosis and treatment
- focus is objective disease
- signs and symptoms expected to resolve with treatment
- continuing symptoms related to unresolved pathology
Biopsychosocial model
- Engel 1977
- developed from recognition that some people with physcial illness recover better than others and seems to be influenced by lots of factors
- useful when considering why people do/don’t engage in protective behaviours like regular attendance/tooth brushing
- social, biological and psychological factors
Examples of social factors
- interactions between patient and dental team
- attitudes of family, friends, society
- access to transport, mobility, finance
- work and family commitments
Examples of psychological factors
- thoughts (beliefs, attitudes, memories of past experiences)
- feelings
- behaviours
The importance of acknowledgement of emotions in routine patient psychological assessments (example in dental setting) - study 1
- patients high in dental anxiety filled in an anxiety questionnaire before visiting dentist (STAI-S)
- also filled out the MDAS - patients randomised into 2 groups
- group 1, their dentists were given their MDAS copy
- group 2, weren’t
- after app, filled out STAI-S again, patients anxiety in group 1 reduced more than group 2
The importance of acknowledgement of emotions in routine patient psychological assessments (example in dental setting) - study 2
- patients with high dental anxiety filled out STAI-S before dental visit
- randomised into groups
- control had no MDAS
- another group - filled out MDAS and handed to receptionist - didn’t know they gave it to the dentist
- another group filled out MDAS and handed directly to dentist
- compared to other groups, those handing straight to dentist much less anxious (on STAI-S) when leaving surgery