02. STUDY MANUAL questions on Termination of contract. Flashcards
An interior designer having substantially performed their contract, despite there being some remaining snags …
is entitled to receive the contract price less a reasonable deduction for the defects and omissions.
T/F: Parties are discharged from their contract if altered circumstances render the contract fundamentally different in nature from what was orignally agreed.
TRUE
T/F: Parties are discharged if an event, for which neither party is responsible, occurs which renders performance impossible or futile.
TRUE
T/F: Parties who contract that something should be done are discharged if performance becomes sustantially more expensive or onerous.
FALSE
T/F: Parties who contract that something should be done are discharged if their assumption that certain conditions (which are fundamental to the contract), would continue, proves to be totally false.
TRUE
T/F: A caterer is likely to be able to claim damages in respect of their ordinary business if an oven supplier breaches their contract for the supply of a new oven.
TRUE
T/F: A caterer is likely to be able to claim damages in respect of a contract brought to the attention of an oven supplier if that supplier breaches their contract for the supply of a new oven.
TRUE
T/F: A caterer is likely to be able to claim damages in respect of a potentially lucrative contract if an oven supplier breaches their contract for the supply of a new oven.
FALSE
see Victoria Laundries v Newman
T/F: A garage whose customer deprives them of a £500 profit will not have damages awarded against them if they subsequently are able to make a £1,500 profit on the same car.
TRUE
The garage has fully mitigated their loss.
T/F: An exclusion clause written on a notice affixed to the glove box of a rented car will be enforceable.
FALSE
It has not been sufficiently incorporated into the contract at the time the agreement was made.
T/F: The frustration of a contract is a lawful excuse not to perform one’s obligations under it.
TRUE
T/F: An agreement between parties to a contract is a lawful excuse not to perform one’s obligations under it.
TRUE
T/F: The prevention of performance by the other party is a lawful excuse not to perform one’s obligations under it.
TRUE
T/F: An increase in the cost or complexity of performance is a lawful excuse not to perform one’s obligations under it.
FALSE
Such events DO NOT frustrate a contract.
… are a common law remedy designed to restore the injured party to the position they would have been had a contract been performed.
Damages
Damages are a … remedy designed to restore the injured party to the position they would have been had a contract been performed.
common law
Damages are a common law remedy designed to …
restore the injured party to the position they would have been had a contract been performed.
A loss outside the natural course of events will only be compensated if the exceptional circumstances are …
within the defendant’s knowledge at the time of making the contract.