007- Sex Offences Flashcards
Define sexual violation? Simply
Non consensual sexual connection with another person
What must the crown prove in all cases of sexual violation?
1- intentional act by offender involving sexual connection
2- complainant didn’t consent
3- offender didn’t believe was consenting or grounds for this belief not reasonable
Section for no legal defence for spouses for rape or unlawful sexual connection charges?
128(4)
Rape definition as per 128(2)
Effected by the penetration of person B genitalia by person A penis AND
Without B”s consent and w/o belief on reas grounds that they consent to the connection
What are the 2 forms of sexual violation under S128(1)?
a) rape of another person
b) unlawful sexual connection with another person
Unlawful sexual connection defined as per S128(3)
Person A has a sexual connection with person B w/o consent and w/o belief in reas grounds that person B consents
Sec 2 definition of sexual connection is……? (3 things)
Effected by the intro into genitalia/anus of one person of a body part of another or object held of manipulated
Connection between mouth or tongue of one and another’s genitalia/anus
Continuation of above
Sec 2 penetration: What amount of penetration is required to be proven?
Any degree of penetration no matter how slight or fleeting
How do we prove penetration? (3 things)
1- compl evidence
2- medical evidence (injuries/DNA)
3- def admissions
Sec 2 definition genitalia?
Reproductive organs including penis and testicles of a male and vagina/vulva of a female and any surgically constructed/altered genitalia analogous to male or female genitalia
R v KOROHEKE (genitalia)
Genitalia comprise the reproductive organs interior and exterior including the vulva and labia, both interior/exterior @ opening of vagina
Is penetration required in oral sexual connection charges?
Touching of another persons genitalia/anus with mouth/tongue is sufficient
Sec 127 - no presumption due to age- what does this section state?
Any person is capable- in law of being involved in sexual connection
Describe the subjective/objective test in relation to consent?
Subjective: (what were they thinking @ time)
Compl didn’t consent
Offender didn’t believe was consenting
Objective: (what should they have thought)
Grounds for any such belief not reasonable
What is consent?
Persons conscious/voluntary agreement to something desired/proposed by another
R v COX (consent)
Consent must be full free voluntary and informed, freely/voluntarily given by a person a in a position to form a rational judgement
R v GUTUAMA
“Gucci shoes of accused”
Under obj test crown must prove no reas person in accused shoes could thought compl was consenting
When is the material time consent considered to be relevant?
At the time the act took place
List possible reasons consent won’t be valid as per S128A?
1- no protest or resistance
2- allowed due to force/threat or fear of force
3- asleep/unconscious
4- so intoxicated
5- so impaired by intellectual/mental or physical impairment they can’t consent
6- mistaken ID
7- mistaken nature-quality (eg ghosting)
Not limited by above list
R v KOROHEKE (consent)
“KOROHEKE bash if no smash”
Important distinguish between consent freely given and submission to something u wanted or unavoidable
Eg - submission due to fear of what might happen if they don’t doesn’t = true consent
2 things a person must have done to be guilty of an attempt?
1- have an intent to commit the offence
2- real and substantial steps to committing offence
If it was physically impossible to commit the offence can you be guilty of an attempt?
In short yes. Sec 72 - “whether it was possible to commit the offence or not
What must the crown prove in relation to intent for an attempt offence?
That the def intended to commit the full offence.
(Attempts essentially means they fell short of the full offence AKA = fail!)
R v COLLISTER
Offenders Intent can be inferred from circumstances:
- actions/words before/during/after offence
- surrounding circumstances
- nature of act itself
R v HARPUR (attempts include)
An act or omission constituting a substantial step in commission of the crime
How is conduct sufficiently proximate determined by the court?
Analysis of the def”s conduct at relevant time in conjunction with evidence of their intent based on the circumstances
R v HARPUR (attempts conduct cumulative)
Court may view conduct cumulatively and in its entirety up to when the conduct stops
(What remains is relevant not determinative)
Liability: sexual conduct with child?
Sec 132(1)
1- person
2- has sexual connection
3- with a child
Cover no defence re consent
COX v R (10/11 consent)
The court Don’t exclude possibility a child 10/11 may be able to give full and free consent to sexual intercourse, circumstances justifying this would be exceptional if not rare
COX v R (10/11 reasonable adult re consent)
Except in exceptional/rare circ”s even if they agree, no reasonable adult has grounds for believing a 10/11 year old has experience/maturity to understand nature or significance of the act
R v FORREST & FORREST
Crown must adduce best evidence possible in the circumstances in order to prove the victims age
An indecent act is generally accepted to be what?
An act accompanied by circumstances of indecency
(R v LEESON)
R v COURT
“Court by right minded ppl”
Indecency mens conduct that right thinking ppl will consider an affront to the sexual modesty of the complainant