0004 Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Cases (SMR 4.4) Flashcards
How did the Supreme Court come to be?
Created by the Constitution (Third Article)
Made up of Chief Justice and 8 Justices who are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate
What does the Supreme Court do?
Basically the Supreme Court is a court of appeals (Appelate Court), they rule on cases already tried in lower courts (municipal, state courts)
They have some original jurisdiction such as any case brought up against a diplomat or the President or where a state is a party in the case
What does the 11th amendment do?
states a sovereignty of power given to the state which limits the jurisdiction on cases brought against states
The Supreme Court originally played a marginal role until what court?
The Marshall Court (1801 - 1835), the role of the Supreme Court as the interpreter of the Constitution was established (note that courts are named after their chief justice)
What were the two cases that set up the Supreme Court as the interpreters of the Constitution?
Marbury vs. Madison (1803)
Martin vs. Hunter’s Lesee (1816)
What was the Marbury vs. Madison case & why was it important?
Once Adams found out he lost re-election to Jefferson, he attempted to put in federalist judges (known as “midnight judges”). This didn’t happen in time, mainly because Marshall who was Secretary of State and the incoming Chief Justice didn’t deliver the appointments in time. Madison becomes new Secretary of State and is told by Jefferson not to deliver the commissions. Marbury was one of the midnight judges who was supposed to be admitted and he brings it to Supreme Court. First time Supreme Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Importance: Marshall set up that it was the domain of the Supreme Court to decide what the law is, set up the Supreme Court as the Supreme Court of appeals specifically on constitutional rights
What case is the following quote from?
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the Justice Department to say what the law is”
Marbury vs. Madison (1803)
What was the Martin vs. Hunter’s Lessee case?
During the Revolutionary period, The Loyalist Martin Family was driven from their land to Virginia and the land was sold to David Hunter. Because of the Jay’s Treaty, Martin believed he should have his land. Virginia enacted legislation to confiscate loyalist’s property, was taken to Supreme Court who sent it back to Virginia and then reversed the state courts decision on appeal
Marshall sided with Martin
Importance: First case to assert ultimate Supreme Court authority over state courts in civil matters of federal law
What two cases established the authority of the Supreme Court both over States and the President?
McCulloch vs. Maryland (1819)
United States vs. Nixon (1974)
What was the McCulloch vs. Maryland 1819 case?
The Second Bank of the US had a branch in Maryland. Maryland tries to tax the federal bank and it went to court. McCulloch was a bank teller and the state ruled against McCulloch. But when it went to the Supreme Court it went against Maryland and claimed that the states cannot prevent the federal govt from exercising its constitutional power.
Importance: Showed that federal govt had power over states
What was the United States vs. Nixon 1974 case?
The case was over the release of tapes as evidence in the Watergate scandal. Nixon claimed he had privilege of immunity as the president and the Supreme Court ordered that a President doesn’t hold executive power to withhold evidence in a criminal investigation.
Importance: Showed Supreme Court’s Authority over President
What three key supreme court cases concerned civil rights?
Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896)
Brown vs. the Board of Education of Topeka (1954)
Adarand Constructors vs. Pena (1995)
What was the Plessy vs. Ferguson case (1896)?
Challenged the Separate Car Act (segregation of train cars)
Upheld the rights of the states to keep segregation under the separate but equal doctrine
What was the Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)?
Overturned Plessy vs. Ferguson
“Separate but Equal” doctrine is inherently unequal
Racial Segregation violates the 14th Amendment
What was the Adarand Constructors vs. Pena (1995) case?
A construction company was looking for a subcontractor to do work for US dept of transportation. Even though Adarand Construction was the lowest bid, it was awarded to a different construction company because the Small Business Administration was giving financial incentives for employed disadvantaged businesses.
Adarand Construction sued and the Supreme Court sided in their favor saying the federal govt is bound by the same standards of race neutrality that is required of states in the 14th amendment.