... Flashcards
Trait Approach
How people differ psychologically
Biological Approach
Understanding the mind in terms of the body
Psychoanalytic approach
Focusing on the unconscious mind and internal mental conflict
Phenomenological Approach
Focusing on people’s conscious experience of the world
- Humanistic: how conscious awareness produces uniquely human attributes
- Cross-cultural: how the experience of reality differs across culture
Learning and Cognitive Processes Approach
- Learning: how behavior changes as a result of rewards, punishments, and other life experiences
- Social learning: how observation and self-evaluation determine behavior
- Cognitive personality: focusing on cognitive processes (e.g., perception, memory, thought) to explain behavior
Accounting for the whole person and real-life concerns
Pros: Inclusive, intersting, and important
Cons: Overwhelming, difficult to manage, research can easily become unfocused or overly inclusive
Addressing focal research questions through separate paradigms/ basic approaches
Pros: each approach is specifically geared towards addressing the questions that it choose to address
Cons: each approach is ill-equipped to address other questions or ignores them altogether
Emphasis on Individual Differences
Pros: sensitivity and respect for individual differences; deeper understanding (other areas treat individual differences as error)
Cons: pigeonholing people
Realistic-accuracy Model
States that accurate personality judgement depend on an individual’s personality trait and a judge’s correct judgement of that trait
Self-other Agreement
The degree of which observers agree with an individual’s self personality judgement
Other-other Agreement
How much observers agree in their judgements of the same person
Personality Prediction Heading
Algorithms can categorize and identify clusters of co-occurring behaviors among a set of digital traces (facial recognition, language, purchasing habits etc)
Why Personality Research Methods are Necessary and Nifty
- Personality data seek to cover all parts of the psychological triad (thoughts, feelings, behaviors)
Funder’s Second Law: “There are no perfect indicators of personality; there are only clues, and clues are always ambiguous”
- Gather as many clues as possible and put them together
Funder’s Third Law: “Something beats nothing, two times out of three”
Four Kind of Clues (BLIS)
- Ask the person directly: self-reports (S data)
- Ask someone who knows: informants’ reports (I data)
- Obtain real-life facts: life outcomes (L data)
- Watch what the person does: behavioral data (B data)
S data: Self-Reports
Advantages
- Large amount of information
- Access to thoughts, feelings, and intentions
- Some S data are true by definition (self-esteem)
- Causal force
- Simple and easy
Disadvantages
- Error
- Bias
- Too simple and too easy
Self-other Agreement
The degree of which observers agree with an individual’s self personality judgement
I data: informants’ reports
Advantages
- Large amount of information
- Real-world basis
- Common sense
- Some I data are true by definition
- Causal force
Disadvantages
- Limited behavioral information
- Lack of access to private experience
- Error
- Bias
L data: Life outcomes
Advantages
- Objective and verifiable
- Intrinsic importance
- Psychological relevance
Disadvantages
- Multi-determination
- Possible lack of psychological relevance
B data: Behavioral Observations
Two forms of B data
- Natural data (based on real life) - Realistic (what people actually do in their lives)
- Laboratory B data (based on behavior in a lab)
- Pros: no need to wait for desired contexts, appearance of objectivity
- Cons: Difficult and expensive, uncertain interpretation and generalizability
Advantages
- Wide range of contexts (both real and contrived)
- Appearance of objectivity
Disadvantages
- Difficult and expensive
- Uncertain interpretation
Aspects of Data Quality
Reliability: do the data consistently measure whatever it is that they measure
Validity: do the data accurately measure what they purport to measure
Generalizability: do the findings from these data apply to other data, situations, or people
Personality Research Design
- Case method: deep dive on one particular event or person in order to find out as much as possible
- Experimental method: finds causal relationship between IV and DV by assigning participants to experimental groups (finding average behavior)
- Correlational method
- Scatter plot: chart on which each point represents an individual’s scores on two variables
- Correlation coefficient: reflects the strength and the direction of the relationship
Psychodynamic approach
Idea that people’s behavior is driven by processes that they are not aware of and that they cannot access
Projective Tests
Important thoughts, feelings, and motives operate outside of conscious awareness
Pros
- Good ice breaker to get clients to open up
- Rorschach: when scored according to specific techniques, some utility for prediction of outcomes
- TAT: some evidence for assessment of implicit motives
Cons
- Scarce validity evidence
- Expensive and time-consuming
- No objectivity: unclear what they really mean
- Other, less expensive tests work as well or better
Projective Hypothesis: if a person is asked to describe or interpret ambiguous stimuli their responses will be influenced by non-conscious needs, feelings, and experiences
Rorschach Inkblots
Individuals are asked to interpret symmetrical blots of ink