... Flashcards

1
Q

Trait Approach

A

How people differ psychologically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Biological Approach

A

Understanding the mind in terms of the body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Psychoanalytic approach

A

Focusing on the unconscious mind and internal mental conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Phenomenological Approach

A

Focusing on people’s conscious experience of the world
- Humanistic: how conscious awareness produces uniquely human attributes
- Cross-cultural: how the experience of reality differs across culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Learning and Cognitive Processes Approach

A
  • Learning: how behavior changes as a result of rewards, punishments, and other life experiences
  • Social learning: how observation and self-evaluation determine behavior
  • Cognitive personality: focusing on cognitive processes (e.g., perception, memory, thought) to explain behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Accounting for the whole person and real-life concerns

A

Pros: Inclusive, intersting, and important

Cons: Overwhelming, difficult to manage, research can easily become unfocused or overly inclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Addressing focal research questions through separate paradigms/ basic approaches

A

Pros: each approach is specifically geared towards addressing the questions that it choose to address

Cons: each approach is ill-equipped to address other questions or ignores them altogether

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Emphasis on Individual Differences

A

Pros: sensitivity and respect for individual differences; deeper understanding (other areas treat individual differences as error)

Cons: pigeonholing people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Realistic-accuracy Model

A

States that accurate personality judgement depend on an individual’s personality trait and a judge’s correct judgement of that trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self-other Agreement

A

The degree of which observers agree with an individual’s self personality judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Other-other Agreement

A

How much observers agree in their judgements of the same person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Personality Prediction Heading

A

Algorithms can categorize and identify clusters of co-occurring behaviors among a set of digital traces (facial recognition, language, purchasing habits etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why Personality Research Methods are Necessary and Nifty

A
  • Personality data seek to cover all parts of the psychological triad (thoughts, feelings, behaviors)

Funder’s Second Law: “There are no perfect indicators of personality; there are only clues, and clues are always ambiguous”
- Gather as many clues as possible and put them together

Funder’s Third Law: “Something beats nothing, two times out of three”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Four Kind of Clues (BLIS)

A
  • Ask the person directly: self-reports (S data)
  • Ask someone who knows: informants’ reports (I data)
  • Obtain real-life facts: life outcomes (L data)
  • Watch what the person does: behavioral data (B data)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

S data: Self-Reports

A

Advantages
- Large amount of information
- Access to thoughts, feelings, and intentions
- Some S data are true by definition (self-esteem)
- Causal force
- Simple and easy

Disadvantages
- Error
- Bias
- Too simple and too easy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self-other Agreement

A

The degree of which observers agree with an individual’s self personality judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

I data: informants’ reports

A

Advantages
- Large amount of information
- Real-world basis
- Common sense
- Some I data are true by definition
- Causal force

Disadvantages
- Limited behavioral information
- Lack of access to private experience
- Error
- Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

L data: Life outcomes

A

Advantages
- Objective and verifiable
- Intrinsic importance
- Psychological relevance

Disadvantages
- Multi-determination
- Possible lack of psychological relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

B data: Behavioral Observations

A

Two forms of B data
- Natural data (based on real life) - Realistic (what people actually do in their lives)
- Laboratory B data (based on behavior in a lab)
- Pros: no need to wait for desired contexts, appearance of objectivity
- Cons: Difficult and expensive, uncertain interpretation and generalizability

Advantages
- Wide range of contexts (both real and contrived)
- Appearance of objectivity

Disadvantages
- Difficult and expensive
- Uncertain interpretation

20
Q

Aspects of Data Quality

A

Reliability: do the data consistently measure whatever it is that they measure

Validity: do the data accurately measure what they purport to measure

Generalizability: do the findings from these data apply to other data, situations, or people

21
Q

Personality Research Design

A
  1. Case method: deep dive on one particular event or person in order to find out as much as possible
  2. Experimental method: finds causal relationship between IV and DV by assigning participants to experimental groups (finding average behavior)
  3. Correlational method
    - Scatter plot: chart on which each point represents an individual’s scores on two variables
    - Correlation coefficient: reflects the strength and the direction of the relationship
22
Q

Psychodynamic approach

A

Idea that people’s behavior is driven by processes that they are not aware of and that they cannot access

23
Q

Projective Tests

A

Important thoughts, feelings, and motives operate outside of conscious awareness

Pros
- Good ice breaker to get clients to open up
- Rorschach: when scored according to specific techniques, some utility for prediction of outcomes
- TAT: some evidence for assessment of implicit motives

Cons
- Scarce validity evidence
- Expensive and time-consuming
- No objectivity: unclear what they really mean
- Other, less expensive tests work as well or better

Projective Hypothesis: if a person is asked to describe or interpret ambiguous stimuli their responses will be influenced by non-conscious needs, feelings, and experiences

24
Q

Rorschach Inkblots

A

Individuals are asked to interpret symmetrical blots of ink

25
Thematic Apperception Test (TATs)
Individuals are asked to tell a story based on a a series of ambiguous picture - What they see is not actually on the card/ in the pictures, but reflects the contents of their mind - Projective tests are still frequently used
26
Objective Tests
- Personality tests that are more objective and less open to interpretation - Test consist of a list of questions to be answered using a limited set of response options - Responses to these items then are scored in a standardized, predetermined way - Their response can be based on their subjective experience on the scale of objective answers
27
Principle of Aggregation
average answers to multiple items decreases error and increases stability and reliability
28
Constructing Objective Personality Tests
Rational method: write items that seem directly, obviously, and rationally related to what is to be measured Factor analytic method: select items that group together by using factor analysis - a statistical technique that identifies clusters of things that have something in common Empirical method: identify items based on how people in predetermined groups respond
29
The "I" & the "Me"
Me = part of the self that is observed and described (epistemological self) I = part of the self that does the observing and describing (ontological self)
30
Contents of the Self: Declarative knowledge
Facts and impressions of ourselves that we consciously know and can describe - Self-esteem: evaluation of one’s own worth as a person (the extent to which someone feels that they are worthy and good) - Self-schema: all of one’s ideas about the Self organized into a coherent system
31
Contents of the Self: Procedural knowledge
Knowledge expressed through actions rather than words Relational self: Self-knowledge based on past experiences that directs how we relate to the important people in our lives Implicit self: We have attitudes, feelings, and opinions about many things of which we are not fully aware - Relational selves and implicit selves may work unconsciously
32
Self-Esteem Outcomes
Low self-esteem - Depression, dissatisfaction, loneliness, hopelessness, delinquency High self-esteem - Relationship quality social network size, social support, physical health, mental health, job success, work satisfaction Too high self-esteem - Arrogance, abusive behavior, criminal behavior, narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder
33
Social Media & Self-Esteem
- Overall small negative effects of social media usage on self-esteem - Negative effects tend to be stronger in (1) women, (2) eastern cultures - Effects depends on (1) how the user engages with social media content, (2) the nature of the content, and (3) the user’s psychological characteristics - Social upward comparison: hurts self esteem/positive feedback from network size etc
34
Roles & Tasks of the Self
3 Roles - Social actor who seeks to maintain social approval while being oneself - Motivated agent who strive to achieve goals, plans, projects - Autobiographical actor who reconstructs the past and imagines the future to create a coherent life story that offers continuity and purpose 4 tasks: - Self-regulation - Information-processing filter - Relate to others - Foster sense of identity
35
Self-Reference and Memory
Long-term memory (LTM): permanent memory storage; elaboration is useful for moving information to LTM Self-Reference effect: information that gets linked to the self shows - Enhanced long-term memory - Increased accessibility - Variation across cultures
36
Self-Efficacy
A person's belief in their capacity to succeed in a specific task - Sets the limits for what we attempt to do
37
Actual & Desired Selves
Actual self = who you really are Ideal self = who you would like to be Ought self = who you should be
38
Self-Discrepancy Theory
- Actual self ≠ ideal self: depression (because of disappointment at failing to achieve plans) - Actual self ≠ ought self: anxiety (because of fear at being punished by others)
39
The Really Real Self
People believe that beneath all the different forms of self there must be one single “real” self that ties it all together The core, unchanging self: - External appearances, attitudes, and behaviorrs change across situations and over time, but the one who does the experiencing of life is still the same - The I is unaltered as the Me is changed
40
Realistic-Accuracy Model (RADU)
1. Relevance: cues that are relevant to the trait being judged 2. Availability: evidence available for the cue 3. Detect: the cues has to be detected 4. Utilization: use those cues to make the personality judgement
41
How People Differ Psychologically
Absolute vs Relative Consistency - Individual differences are maintained across situations, even when absolute behavior changes - Situations influence behavior, but people are still consistent - Personality affects and predicts important life outcomes and its effects accumulate over entire lifespans The Trait Approach: personality trait = the necessary, basic concept for measuring and understanding individual differences
42
Interactionism
- People create their situations based on their personality - Individuals select situations based on their personalities and the situations they spend time in - in turn - affect their personalities Social situations: who we are around also affects how we behave Cultural situations: language impacts our personalities Strong situations: situations may override the impact of personality
43
Personality Judgement
- The judgements others make of us amount to the reputation that we have - These judgement influence our lives in the social world, whether they are accurate Expectancies - Others’ judgements can also affect people through self-fulfilling prophecies - When people expect someone to be a certain way, they treat that person in a way that then elicits reactions that confirm their expectations
44
The Pygmalion Effect
Out expectations of someone alter how we view their behavior
45
Convergent Validation
Process of assembling diverse pieces of information that converge on a common conclusion - Interjudge agreement (degree to which different people form the same impression) - Behavioral prediction (degree to which judgement can predict actual behavior)
46
Self-Personality Judgement
People tend to: - (1) attribute their own behaviorr to the situation - (2) assume that others would have done the same thing