Yr 1 research methods - Experimental method, variables, design Flashcards
To review the research methods topic from year 1
Define an aim in psychological research
A general statement that describes the purpose of an investigation
What is an experimental hypothesis
A statement that predicts how one variable will affect the other
Define a directional experimental hypothesis
An hypothesis that predicts the difference you expect to find. They use words such as ‘more’, ‘higher’, ‘less’, ‘faster’
What is a non-directional hypothesis
This hypothesis just states that there will be a difference between the conditions, but doesn’t predict what this difference will be
Variable
Any factor that can vary or change within an experiment
Independent variable (IV)
An aspect of the situation that is varied by the experiment
Dependent variable (DV)
The variable that is measured by the researcher. This change should have been caused by the IV
What does operationalisation of variable mean
Clearly defining variables as to how they can be measured. E.g. obedience measured by how many volts P’s went to in the Milgram study.
When would psychologists choose a directional hypothesis
If there is previous research in the area that supports a particular outcome
What are levels of the IV
This means that you have conditions to compare against each other in your study. For example, the experimental condition vs the control condition are 2 levels of the IV
Extraneous variables
Any other factors that could potentially interfere with either the IV or the DV
What is a confounding variable
Any variable, other than the IV, that may have had an effect on the DV in a way that wasn’t intended. They change systematically with the IV. E.g. An extravert personality in a study about the effect of red bull on chattiness levels! This means they confound your results.
Demand characteristics
Clues in the experimental situation that give away what the the experimenter’s intention is in the study
Participant reactivity
The way that participants try to make sense of the situation they find themselves in in the study
Investigator effects
Any unwanted influence of the researcher on the investigation outcome. For example, use of leading questions, Non-verbal communication, instructions given
Randomisation
A technique that helps to reduce the effects of extraneous and confounding variables. For example, randomising the order of words in a memory test
Standardisation
This means ensuring that all participants in a study have the same instructions, environment and experience, other than the planned changes in the IV
Participant variables
Any individual differences between participants that May affect the DV
Situational variables
Any features of the experimental situation that may affect the DV
Experimental design
Refers to how the testing of participants is arranged according in relation to the different experimental conditions
Independent groups design
A design of experiment where separate groups of participants experience different levels of the IV, e.g experimental or control condition.
Matched pairs design
Participants are paired together on some variable that might be relevant to the experiment, e.g. age, gender. Each member of the pair is then in a separate condition, like independent groups.
Repeated measures design
A design of experiment where all participants experience both/all levels of the IV. This means they will do the experimental and control conditions.
What are the 2 main weaknesses of the independent groups design
- Participant variables between groups can cause changes in the DV
- Less economical because you can only use each participant for one condition
What are the 2 main strengths of the independent groups design
- Order effects are not a problem because participants only experience one condition
- Demand characteristics are less likely because participants only experience one condition
What are the 2 main weaknesses of the repeated measures design
- Order effects can be a problem because the order in which they do the conditions might have a significant effect on the DV
- Demand characteristics can be a problem as participants experience both conditions
What are the 2 main strengths of the repeated measures design
- Less participants are needed as they take part in both conditions
- It controls for participant variables between the 2 conditions
What are the 2 main weaknesses of the matched pairs design
- Some participant variables that haven’t been matched between groups can still cause changes in the DV
- Less economical because you can only use each participant for one condition
What are the 3 main strengths of the matched pairs design
- Important participant variables can be controlled that might influence the DV
- Order effects are not a problem because participants only experience one condition
- Demand characteristics are less likely because participants only experience one condition
Random allocation to groups
In independent groups and matched pairs designs, participants are randomly allocated to the different conditions
Counterbalancing
This helps to control order effects in repeated measures design by giving half the group condition A then B and the other half condition B then A. (ABBA technique)