Year 2 Flashcards
What is evidence based medicine
Princess of identifying and using most up to date and relevant evidence to inform decisions for individual patient problems
Process of evidence based medicine
Need for info into an answerable question
Identifying best evidence to answer it
Critically appraising the evidence for validity impact and applicability
Interstates critical appraisal with clinical expertise and patients unique circumstances
Evaluating effectiveness and efficiency and seeking ways to improve
Which factors influence infection
Infectious agents (ability to survive and spread, infectivity, pathogenicity)
Environment (contamination humans animals water)
Mode of transmission (airborne blood sexual contact direct consumption)
Portal of entry (mouth nose skin gi)
Host factors (illness nutrition age lifestyle)
Infections in health care
Nosocomial infections
Uti pneumonia lower respiratory tract infection surgical wounds septicemia
Rare ones eg chicken pox tb mrsa
90/10 gap
Less than 10% of worldwide resources devoted to health research put towards health in developing countries where over 90% of all preventable deaths worldwide occur
What is R0
Basic reproduction rate
Average number of individuals directly infected by an infectious case during infectious period in a totally susceptible population (number of secondary cases following an infection)
List some internal immunization programmes
Expanded programme on immunization (EPI)
Global polio eradication initiative (GPEI)
Global alliance for vaccines and immunization (GAVI)
Calman hine report
Examined cancer services in uk and proposed restructuring of cancer services to achieve a more equitable access to high levels of expertise throughout the country
Consequences of calman hine report
All patients having equal access to high quality of care
Public and professional education to recognize early symptoms of cancer
Patients families and carers given clear info on treatment options and outcomes
Patient centred
Primary care to be central to cancer care
Psychological needs of patients and carers to be recognized
What is the national cancer survivorship initiative
Partnership with cancer charities clinicians and patients considered a range of approaches for improving services and support available for cancer survivors
Importance of hair
Individual and group identity
Symbol of femininity
Stigma
Shows sickness status
What is surveillance
Systematic collection collation and analysis of data and dissemination of results so appropriate measures can be taken
Purpose of surveillance
Early warning system for impending public health emergencies
Document impact of an intervention or track progress towards specific goals
Monitor and clarify epidemiology
Role of WHO in public health
Providing leadership and engaging in partnerships where joint action needed
Shaping research agenda
Setting norms and standards and promoting and monitoring them
Articulating ethical and evidence based policy options
Providing technical support
Monitoring health situations and trends
Functions of a clinical record
Support patient Care
Improve future patient care
Social purposes at request of patients
Medico-legal document
ABCDE method of breaking bad news
Advanced preparation Building a relationship Communicate well Deal with patient reactions Encourage and validate emotions
SPIKES method of breaking bad news
Setting up Perception Invitation Knowledge Emotions Strategy and summary
Role of midwife in postnatal care
Screeening/identification of at risk clients Lifestyle changes Mental health services Health promotion Information-bonding breast feeding Reassurance and support Safeguarding
Sensitivity
Proportion of positive correctly identified
True positives /(true positives+false negatives)
Specificity
Proportion if negatives correctly identified
True negatives/ true negatives+ false positives
Limitations of screening
Expensive Adverse effects (stress radiation exposure discomfort ) Stress caused by false positive False sense of security by false negatives which delay final diagnosis
Four resources used when making a clinical decision
P atient preferences
A vailable resources
R esearch evidence
C linical expertise
Positive predictive value
Probability that subjects with a positive screening test truly have the disease
True positives / all positives
Negative predictive value
Probability of subjects with a negative screening test truly don’t have the disease
True negative / all negative
Near miss
Situation which events arise during clinical care but fail to develop further
Can report it at the national reporting and learning system
What are the free travel vaccines available
Diphtheria polio tetantus typhoid hepatitis a cholera
Paper records
Continuous portable writer identified legibility issues must be dated and signed
Electronic records
Problem orientated searchable structured safer prescribing clinical decision support software
Adverse event
Unintended even resulting from clinical care and causing patient harm
Near miss
Situation in which events arise during clinical care but fail to develop further
Types of errors
Knowledge- wrong doings due to inadequate knowledge or experience
Rule based- misapplication of a good rule or application of a bad rule
Skills based-attention slips and memory lapses
What to do when adverse incidents occur
Report it incident reporting systems
Assess its seriousness
Analyze why it occurred (root cause analysis)
Be open and honest with affected patients and apologize (duty of candor)
Learn from event and put in place actions to reduce risk of repeat
Purpose of surveillance
Serve as an early warning system for health emergencies
Document the impact of an intervention
Monitor and clarify epidemiology of health problems
Length bias
The overestimating of survival duration among screening-detected cases due to an increase of slowly progressing cases
Active failures
Unsafe acts committed by people in direct contact with the patient
Usually short lived and predictable
Latent error
Develop over time until they combine with other factors or active failures to cause an adverse event
Long lived and can be removed before they cause an adverse event
Types of violations
Routine (regularly performed has become a norm)
Reasoned (reasoned, done for patients best interests)
Reckless (deliberate deviations from protocol but not intended to cause harm)
Malicious (deliberate deviations intended to cause harm)
Mental health problems in post natal period
Baby blues (50-80%)- acute stress reaction treated with reassurance Postnatal depression (10-15%) low mood for more than two weeks tcas and ssris Postnatal psychosis (0.2%) thoughts of harming themselves or the baby and delusions etc ECT therapy
Summary hospital level mortality indicator
Ratio between actual number of patients who die within 30 days of discharge compared to expected to die average
Male screening programmes
Newborn and infamy physical exam Newborn blood spot Newborn hearing Diabetic eye Bowel cancer Abdominal aortic aneurysm (age65)
Primary care records
Advanced computer systems
Paper light
Limited access for community teams
Serious incidents
Opportunity for learning very large
Warrant and use resources to investigate and act
Serious consequences to patients or staff
Four areas of child development
Gross motor
Find motor and vision
Hearing speech language
Social skills and behavior
The midwives act 1902
The normality of child bearing and calling doctors as soon as abnormality occurs
Equal access to midwives of all socioeconomic standings
Four areas of development
Frods motor
Fine motor
Hearing speech language
Social skills / Behaviour
Development checks
Neonatal examination
6-8wk gp fheck
1 yr check by health visitor
2-2.5yr check by hv
Development red flags
No smile at 8 weeks Not holding objects at 5 months Not sitting at 12 months Not walking at 18 months Not pointing at objects at 2 years
Leading cause of death in young people
Suicide
Patient death causes
Poor clinical monitoring
Diagnostic error
Inadequate drug/ treatment (acts of commission)
Acts of ommision
Failure to treat according to test evidence
PICO
Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
Match pico to study design
Diagnosis -cross sectional study Aetiology- cohort study Prognosis/ cohort study Therapy- RCT Evaluation/acceptance- qualitative research
Three main questions for evaluating a study
Are the results valid
What are the results
Can i apply the results to this patients care
Theories of nhs waiting lists
Backlog
Demand management (waiting acts as deterrent to prevent frivolous use)
Allows resources to be fully used -no waste
Underfunding and inefficiency
Individualised multifactorial intervention
Strength and balance training
Home hazard assessment and intervention
Vision assessment and referral
Medication review
Falls prevention programme
Discuss what changes a person is willing to make
Address fear of falling and encourage activity
Educate
Measures to prevent falling
How to cope if they fall
Palliative care services
Generalists- primary health care team, nursing home, secondary services, social services
Specialist- specialist nurse and physicians, hospices, marie curie nurses
District nurse
Primary health care team
Community based
Hands on skills
Practice nurse
PHCT
Practice baded
Hands on
Marie curie nurse
Community based
Arranged by district nurse
Specialist palliative care skills
Hand on
Macmillan nurse
Community or hospital based
Specislist care
Advice support and resource
Publication bias
Non publication of study results because of strength or direction of finding
Can result in overestimation of treatment benefits
Performance bias
Unequal provision of healthcare between treatment and control group apart from treatment being tested
Eh placebo group receiving additional therapies or patients changing their health behaviours
Lead time bias
Overestimation of survival due to early detection of screening rather than clinical presentation
Eg survival following diagnosis
Population attributable risk
Risk of disease will increase as exposure prevalence of relative risk increases
Eg more people who smoke the more risk of cvd attributable to smoking in population
Risk decision analysis steps
Decision tree Assess probability Assess utility Identify option that maximises utility Could conduct sensitivity analysis If two options have same expected utility then it’s a toss up
Food frequency questionnaires
Pros and cons
Pros: it captures usual diet and less work to code/complete
Cons: doesn’t record actual diet as eaten, overestimation of fruit and veg , poor measure of energy intake and less flexible
Decision analytic approach benefits
Makes all assumptions in a decision explicit
Allows examination of the process of making a decision
Integrated research evidence
Can be used for individual decisions, population level decisions and cost effective analysis
Cardiophobic
Anxiety disorder characteristic of repeated chest pains and palpitations accompanied with fear of heart attack and dying
Da costas syndrome
‘Irritable heart’
Dyspnoea fatigue rapid pulse palpitations chest pain
Mostly with exertion
Associated with exhaustion and emotional strain
Population strategy pros and cons
Pros : large potential as targeting many people
Cons: population paradox- small perceived individual benefit, poor motivation and can cause compliance issues. Benefit for risks is low
Types of singlular economic health evaluations
All called partial evaluation
Outcome description (consequences only)
Cost description (cost only)
Cost-outcome description (both)
Types of economic health evaluation where two or more alternatives compared
Partial evaluation- effectiveness analysis (consequences only)
Partial evaluation- cost analysis (costs only)
Both is full economic evaluation
Types of full economic evaluation
Cost effectiveness- single common variable measures eg life years gained
Cost utility- quantity and quality of life eg qalys
Cost benefit- all effects measured outcomes valued by money spent
Two ways evaluations can be conducted
Conducted alongside RCT or non randomised studies eg before and after . These collect primary data
Rely on secondary data or existing studies eg technology assessment reviews for NICE
Cost minimisation analysis
Not full for of economic evaluation
Assumes health effects to be equal in each alternative
Appropriate when prior evidence suggests there is no or little difference in outcomes between the options
Cost effective analysis
Effects measured in most appropriate uni dimensional natural unit or health profiles
Cost per unit effect
Eg renal failure cost per life saved
Where does cea data come from
Evaluation alongside rct usually only one year time limit
Modelling-data from literature, meta analysis needs to be non biased
Incremental cost effectiveness ratio
(Cost of intervention- cost of control)/
Effectiveness of intervention- control
Cea advantages and disadvantages
Straightforward to carry out and easy to understand
But narrow uni dimensional measure of effect so can’t compare alternatives measured in different units
Qaly league table approach problems
Used in cost utility analysis Maximises efficiency within nhs budget But methods underlying cost/qaly estimates may differ between studies Opportunity cost ignored Lowest qaly ones may be ignored
Cost benefit analysis adavantages
Allows comparison across programmes with different health outcomes
Allows comparison with non health care interventions so can be used to allocate a global budget
Overall public sector efficiency needs a standardised price per unit of outcome that funders are willing to pay
CBA issues
How do we value a life or health outcome
Must measure time being spent
Most comprehensive but rarely undertaken
Which economic evaluation is preferred choice
Cost utility analysis
NICE recommends it where costs measured in pounds and outcomes in qalys
Zoonosis
Objects or materials likely to carry infection
Basic reproductive number
R0
Number of cases each particular case generates
Affected by rates of contacts probability of transmission and duration of infectiousness