YC - Matt Flashcards

1
Q

How many users, how did you you acquire them?

A

We will have no users until we raise money to start our fund. We are unique in that we are in essence paying our customers, so we need LP funding first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do you know about these users that no one else knows?

A

They often do not bring meritorious cases to court because of exorbitant legal cost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is your distribution strategy?

A

Direct cold outreach and developing strong relationships with existing law firm partners.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is your value proposition

A

We help platintiffs with small-size cases get justice by using technology to make funding their cases profitable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How will you make money?

A

Patronus takes a percentage of the recovery amount. On the investor side, we charge carry and management fees like a hedge fund

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are you open to changing your idea?

A

We are always adjusting our approach based on new information, and would be happy to change if there’s a more compelling way to have a large scale impact on this industry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did your team meet?

A

We met on Angellist. We were the right combination in terms of our skillsets. But what I wasn’t expecting was for us to become such great friends. We all moved to NYC to work together over quarantine, and Andrew and I are actually living together now and he’s the best roommate I’ve had. And Josh practically lives at our place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why do you want to dedicate your life to working on this?

A

People don’t truly have access to justice with current lit fin - it’s too expensive. With technology, we have the possbility to make it affordable and accessible to everyone. That will create REAL access to justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who needs what you’re making?

A

Young New York attorneys who are starting their own practices, and need money to fuel growth. Plaintiffs use it to afford lawsuits they couldn’t otherwise / free up their cash flow for core business activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do customers discover you?

A

1 will be through referral / recommendations from law firms we develop relationships with. This is the best channel based on conversations with brokers and funders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where do new users come from?

A

We will find new users through cold calling, warm introductions from our attorney relationships, litfin brokers, existing funders that pass along cases that are too small. We will also likely develop channels via targeted advertising and content marketing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What have you built? (Matt)

A

Taught myself how to code and built a prototype early on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Tell me about your legal background

A

Worked alongside founding partner to lead one of the largest arbitrations at my firm at the time, second chaired the arbitration at trial, also helped clients recover $100Ms of dollars in claims. Worked on every stage of litigation, from pre-filing through post-judgement recovery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What other kinds of users could you go after once you get all these users using your software?

A

We would expand to other case types first, to test out how our models apply when agnostic of case type, and then plan to expand on to federal jurisdictions where case sizes are larger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why did you pick this idea to work on?

A

I’ve worked in litigation and have seen clients with deep pockets overwhelm clients with shallow pockets time and time again. We believe that everyone deserves access to justice, even when they don’t have a war chest. I also have an applied math background and believe that there are clear patterns in litigation that should be used to understand case outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What do you understand about your users?

A

Lawyers who take on smaller cases usually do not charge fees, and take 25% of case winnings. Lawyers who take on larger cases charge fees, and generally advise their clients not to pursue smaller cases because of reward to cost ratio is too small.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tell us about your team

A

I have experience working in every stage of litigation and have helped clients recover hundreds of millions of dollars. Andrew built his own quantitative trading desk at one of the top trading firms in the country. Josh’s background in business operations is critical for us to source and manage thousands of cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who is going to be your first paying customer?

A

A claimsholder who has a claim in the $100K to $1 million damages range (which is typically outside of the scope of most litfin).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What’s your go to market?

A

Our most successful avenue has been cold calling and building relationships with smaller legal practitioners. There are other avenues that we plan to try soon, such as search engine marketing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Why would they switch to your solution from contingency solution?

A

Firstly, contingency fee attorneys don’t cover litigation costs, which can be hundreds of thousands if not more. Attorneys are risk averse, so it’s rare. Some still do, but limited into certain case types usually.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What do they like about this solution?

A

They do not have to put in any of their own money into a case, unless there is a favorable outcome. It is a risk free endeavor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is your growth like / traction?

A

We’re not ready to fund cases yet, but have had close to 250 customer conversations. As an anecdote, we’ve been upfront in telling attorneys that we are not ready to fund cases, yet even this past weekend we have three cases brought to us to fund by lawyers knowing we don’t have any money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why did your team get together?

A

Frankly, we just really care about fairness and justice. It also really helps that this is a really cool, cutting edge problem that could transform the lives of millions of people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How are you understanding customer needs?

A

Each potential customer is contacted over the phone, so we are understanding customer needs through direct conversation. We also have done deep industry research, had numerous conversations with insiders in relevant data legaltechs, litigation attorneys, litfin brokers, and litigation funders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are you building?

A

Not everyone can afford expensive lawyers. We pay for legal fees in exchange for a percentage of what’s won in court. We use machine learning models to fund the cases that need and deserve it most.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How do you know customers need what you’re making?

A

Talked to close to 250 attorneys. We’ve told attorneys that we don’t have funding yet and cannot move forward, but we’ve had attorneys send us cases nonetheless to fund nonetheless.

27
Q

How do new users find out about you?

A

We will find new users through cold calling, warm introductions from our attorney relationships, litfin brokers, existing funders that pass along cases that are too small. We will also likely develop channels via targeted advertising and content marketing

28
Q

If your startup succeeds, what additional areas might you be able to expand into?

A

We want our predictions to be used not only to identify good cases to support, but help others identify unmeritorious cases, so they don’t waste hundreds of thousands of dollars litigating a bad claim.

29
Q

What domain expertise do you have?

A

I have experience working in every stage of litigation and have helped clients recover hundreds of millions of dollars. Andrew built his own quantitative trading desk at one of the top trading firms in the country. Josh’s background in business operations is critical for us to source and manage thousands of cases.

30
Q

You said $200K in your app as your avg case size. Sounds like you’re talking about lower investments now. What gives?

A

Based on customer conversations we’ve had, there is a strong need for funding at lower price ranges.

31
Q

Fee splitting? Portfolio funding?

A

Hamilton Capital VII, LLC v Khorrami, LLP (2015) case held that portfolio funding did not violate rule 5.4. Other standards for fee splitting from funders such as Validity capital indicate that arrangements cross-collateralized by 3 or more cases avoid fee-splitting issues and also help to satisfy rule 1.8(f) of model rule of professional conduct (client consent, no interference with attorney judgment, confidentiality).

32
Q

What problem are you helping them with?

A

We are financing justice - they have meritorious cases but are unable for the legal fees.

33
Q

Have you considered various mutations of your idea?

A

Buying claims outright, other case types, loans to PI law firms to help expand their practice or to PI plaintiffs for medical/life expenses

34
Q

What can you tell me about your users?

A

Lawyers who take on smaller cases usually do not charge fees, and take 25% of case winnings. Lawyers who take on larger cases charge fees, and frequently advise their clients not to take meritorious cases.

35
Q

Why did your team get together?

A

Frankly, we just really care about fairness and justice. It also really helps that this is a really cool, cutting edge problem that could transform the lives of millions of people.

36
Q

What are you doing now

A

Sales: customer discovery / cold calling law firms to identify traction ripe customer segments. Operationally, we are putting together draft funding agreements based on the cases we are looking at. On the technical side, we are developing the model. Also using On Deck for learning, to stress test our model, and get connected with super helpful people in tech, legal, and litfin from other fellows in ODF.

37
Q

Why will people use this?

A

Talked to close to 250 attorneys. We’ve told attorneys that we don’t have funding yet and cannot move forward, but we’ve had attorneys send us cases nonetheless to fund nonetheless.

38
Q

Who is your user?

A

Plaintiffs who bring claims between 100K and 1 million dollars in damages and law firms who are looking to grow their businesses.

39
Q

What do they not like about this solution?

A

Contingency fee firms do not cover litigation expenses, and also only cover very specific case types for the most part.

40
Q

Who’s paying for it?

A

Law firms and individuals or businesses with lawsuits.

41
Q

What do these users currently pay to have this problem solved?

A

They give up 25% of case winnings by going with a contingency fee firm, or they simply do not litigate the case at all.

42
Q

What makes new users try you?

A

Lawyers use funding to grow their practice, and plaintiffs use it to afford lawsuits they couldn’t otherwise / free up their cash flow for core business activities

43
Q

Why are these users good users to try to solve problems for?

A

We have spoken to close to 250 attorneys, and have heard them tell us that plaintiffs with 100K - 1million dollars in damages are being underserved.

44
Q

What’s the response been like?

A

We’ve had a strong response within the segments we are looking at. We refined our customer segmentation to include plaintiffs who have cases between $100K and $1 million in damages in NYS. Furthermore, we can provide funding for lawyers who typically litigate sub $100K

45
Q

Why have you talked to so few customers?

A
  1. It’s a prospecting process (takes many calls and conversations) and 2. Each case has been identified by our algorithm, and we are iteratively testing the results by me analyzing the claims through reading documents and speaking with attorneys.
46
Q

Why do the reluctant users hold back? What resistance will they have to trying you and how will you overcome it?

A

Lack of knowledge and understanding of litfin. Lack of trust. Poor financial terms. Lack of transparency.

47
Q

How do you know they need it?

A

Lawyers directly told us that they have had clients bring meritorious cases with damages in the range of 200K-300K that needed money for legal fees and litigation expenses. Young attorneys we have spoken to have expressed interest in funding their law firm operations.

48
Q

Why did you say you started in Aug 2019?

A

That was an error. Only really started working full time on this in June 2020.

49
Q

How will customers and/or users find out about you?

A

Direct cold outreach, developing strong relationships with existing law firm partners and legal marketing firms, in person events, brokers, and building up a legal blog.

50
Q

What does each founder do on the team?

A

Matt is focused on sales & marketing and interfacing with Andrew on the legal elements of the model, Andrew is focused on all technical development efforts, and Josh currently supports Matt on the sales/marketing efforts, will focus on LP relations, operations, finance and other business/administrative functions.

51
Q

Why are you uniquely qualified to work on this?

A

I have experience working in every stage of litigation and have helped clients recover hundreds of millions of dollars. Andrew built his own quantitative trading desk at one of the top trading firms in the country. Josh’s background in business operations is critical for us to source and manage thousands of cases.

52
Q

Who wants it?

A

Plaintiffs use it to afford lawsuits they couldn’t otherwise / free up their cash flow for core business activities. Young New York attorneys who are starting their own practices, and need money to fuel growth.

53
Q

How many users are paying?

A

N/A

54
Q

What do they use to solve that problem right now?

A

They either get contingency fee attorneys, or they don’t move forward with the case.

55
Q

What are your users doing now?

A

Lawyers get traditional loans and plaintiffs simply do not proceed with litigation.

56
Q

Second Chair questions

A

I sat alongside founding partner and other lead partner of case in arbitration during final trial before the arbitrator supporting with strategic and logistic matters.

57
Q

What were they doing before?

A

Plaintiffs simply do not proceed with litigation and contingency fee arrangements. Lawyers can get traditional loans to grow their practice.

58
Q

Who is “the boss”?

A

Matt

59
Q

What do they wish that solution could do for them?

A

Cover all costs, and cover all case types.

60
Q

How are they using it?

A

Plaintiffs use it to afford lawsuits they couldn’t otherwise / free up their cash flow for core business activities. Lawyers who have cases that they only receive fees from if they win also benefit from this because they can limit their exposure to bad legal outcomes.

61
Q

Would they be willing to pay more for something better?

A

Yes. We have spoken with several law firms who have indicated their clients have brought cases where damages are below a threshold of $300K where they would have used litigation finance.

62
Q

Why haven’t we just invested in one case?

A

Our model is not yet ready to deploy on cases.

63
Q

Why is this a problem for them?

A

People need money for things other than legal fees - having money lying around to pour into a lawsuit is not always an option.

64
Q

How many lawyers / plaintiffs have you spoken to?

A

244 vetted investment opportunities and conversations with law firms/plaintiffs