Xray and mammo Flashcards
Xray yield proportional to?
Z squared
Auger e heavy vs light elements
Heavy elements more likely x rays
Lighter elements more likely Auger
Secondary ionization electrons are called?
Delta rays
Why use plastic to shield beta emitters?
High Z = more bremstrahlung
Y90
Low Z plastic minimizes brems
mA vs kVp on intensity
mA = quantity, current at cathode
kVp = kinetic energy given to electrons, defines maximum energy
Xray production increases linearly with mA
increasing kVp by 15 % will double the intensity of spectrum
Heat math
tube power =
heat units =
Power = kV x mA
heat units = kVp x mA x seconds
130kv x 190mA = 24,700 watts or 24,700 J for a 1 second exposure
Watt = joule per second
“average energy”
affected by?
rough guess?
attenuation at target, exiting window, collimation
Standard Tungsten target with normal filtration, average energy is 1/3 - 1/2 the maximum energy (kVp)
kVp and mA spectrum changes
kVp moves the peak of the curve, increasing kVp increases average energy (and max energy)
mA increases size (area) of/under the curve
increased kVp and entrance skin dose
Entrance skin dose will change as the square of the change in kVp (tube voltage)
characteristic peaks move?
characteristic peaks go away?
Move = changing target material
Characteristic peaks disappear = kVp dropped below threshold for k shell e
HVL depends on?
DOES NOT DEPEND ON?
average photon energy (more energy = further)
higher Z target anode material GREATER HVL
More filtration, higher average energy GREATER HVL
Less filtration, lower average, LOWER HVL
mAs has no effect
10th HVL ?
“TVL”
attenuate 90%
used for shielding calcs
Average brems energy?
1/3 kVp selected
DEXA methods/trivia
relies on?
methods?
transmission measurements made at 2 different photon energies
filter that drops k-edge into middle of spectrum
switch tube voltage between low and high (70 and 140)
mammo focal spot size?
0.3 and 0.1 mm
general xray focal spot size?
0.6 and 1.2mm
limitation of portable xray anode?
usually stationary (doesn’t rotate), limits tube rating
Target angle and focal spot
SMALLER ANGLE = SMALLER FOCAL SPOT
(better spatial res)
heel effect worse on?
anode side
Heel effect worse with?
SMALLER angle
SMALLER SID
LARGER FOV (less uniform when spread out)
Mammo app of heel effect (position)?
Chest wall Cathode
Nipple Anode
mA/kVp and focal spot?
High mA, low kVp = WIDER
High kVp = SMALLER
more photons spread out more, blooming
higher kVp, moving faster, spread LESS
CLASSICAL/COHERENT interaction
what is?
energy change?
effect on dose?
low energy electron basically bouncing off an outer shell electron
NO ENERGY LOST
DIRECTION CHANGE
DON’T CAUSE IONIZATION
ADDS A TINY BIT OF DOSE
DOESN’T CONTRIBUTE TO IMAGE
Clinical setting of classical/coherent
LOW ENERGY, MOSTLY in MAMMO
15 % of photon interaction below 30keV
COMPTON “BAD GUY”
What is?
3 actors when its done
HIGH ENERGY incoming xray hits an outer shell e, knocks it out, loses some energy and heads off in new direction
IONIZED atom - bad
Free electron - bad, 2ary interactions
scattered photon bad - fogs image
COMPTON interactions depend on/probability of a ?
DOESNT depend on Z of the atom
DOES depend on density of material
DOMINANT contributor to scatter/fog
MAJOR SOURCE OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
PE dominates at?
What is?
LOWER ENERGY RELATIVE to COMPTON
incoming xray gives all energy to inner shell e
ALL OR NOTHING, incomin xray is TOTALLY ABSORBED
–> characteristic xray or Auger (auger dominates in soft tissue, lower Z)
Energy of PE interaction?
need energy higher than inner shell binding
peak energy for PE is around this binding energy
Xrays with more energy pass through
INVERSE to THRID POWER
HIGHER Z makes PE more likely
ALSO INVERSE TO THIRD POWER
PE and image contrast
HIGHER Z = greater chance of PE = more xray absorption
Probability of PE and cubes
DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO Z cubed
INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL TO ENERGY CUBED
K edge
spike in attenuation corresponding to the K shell binding energy
Lower energy are easily attenuated (no contrast)
Higher pass through everything (no contrast)
K edge barium iodine example
kVp selected?
K edge of barium = 37 keV, iodine = 33 keV
Select kVp of 65-90
average energy around these (1/3 - 1/2 kVp)
PEDS XRay
Grid?
kVp?
mAs?
NO GRID
lower kVp ~ 65 (kids are small, don’t need much to penetrate)
(adult cxr kVp = 120-140)
same or just less mAs
attenuation in tissue depends on 3 things?
Effective Z in tissue
X ray beam quality (energy)
Tissue density
ABOVE 30 kEv this interaction dominates?
BELOW?
Above = COMPTON
Below = PE
Noise
photon starvation
Factors that increase or decrease noise
Post processing?
Not a good answer. raw data is still crap
Factors that increase or decrease noise
Field size/collimation
smaller field/collimation decrease photons, increase noise
therefore mAs usually increased with collimation
(in this situation book says answer is collimation decreases noise)
Scatter primarily depends on ?
Collimation - less field less scatter
Thickness of body part
Energy of beam (Compton dominates >26kVp in soft tissue, 35kVp in bone)
Grid ratio
height to distance between
Grid effect on dose?
bucky factor?
increases dose (abc)
mAs with grid/mAs without (usually 2-3)
“Grid cut off”
too many photons blocked –> quantum mottle
grid not aligned/positioned correctly.
kVp and mAs with noise
both increase exposure but kVp going up will increase Compton scatter potentially more noise.
mAs better answer for decreasing noise
SDD and noise?
Increase in noise with increased SDD, described by inverse square law
noise vs mottle
noise includes scatter
mottle = photon starvation
Spatial resolution quant?
Spatial frequency?
Unsharpness?
line pairs per mm
spatial frequency = spatial resolution
unsharpness means loss of spatial res
Types of unsharpness
Motion (decrease exposure time)
System unsharpness = limiting factor of detector
Geometric unsharpness
System unsharpness
Film?
Computed radiography (CR) ?
Digital radiography (DR) ?
Film = size of the grain of photographic chemical
CR = size of laser used to read the phosphor plate
DR = size of individual thermoluminescent transistor
Geometric unsharpness (–> blur)
focal spot
SOD
ODD
MAG
focal spot - smaller = less blur
SOD - further = less blur
ODD - closer = less blur
mag –> blur
Magnification
formula?
SOD + ODD
SOD