X Induction (Series & Divisibility) Flashcards

1
Q

process for series

A

Step 1: To prove the statement is true for the base case ( ie
n = 0, n = 1)

sub n = base case
LHS =
RHS =
LHS = RHS
∴ the statement is true for the base case ( ie n = 0, n = 1)

Step 2: Assume the statement is true for n = k, where k is a positive integer
∴ [insert series + k] = [insert sum with k subbed in] ☆

Step 3: To prove that the statement is true for n = k + 1
To prove [insert series + k + (k + 1)] = [insert sum with (k + 1) subbed in]

LHS = (do algebra) and use ☆ to arrive to [insert sum with (k + 1) subbed in]
∴ LHS = RHS
∴ the statement is true for n = k + 1
Hence by principle of mathematical induction, the statement is true for all positive integers n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

process for divisibility

A

Q is the divider number

Step 1: To prove the statement is true for base case (ie n = 0)

sub n = base case
LHS = XYZ which is divisible by Q
∴ the statement is true for the base case (ie n = 0)

Step 2: Assume the statement is true for n = k, where k is a positive integer > 0 (base case)

sub n = k
XYZ is divisible by Q
∴ XYZ = Qm, for some integer m ☆

Step 3: To prove the statement is true for n = k +1
To prove [XYZ with (k + 1) subbed in] is divisible by Q

(do some algebra with n = k + 1 subbed in) using ☆ to arrive to any integer in brackets ( ie 11m - 2 x 5ᵏ) multiplied by Q

= Q(11m - 2 x 5ᵏ) which is divisible by Q

∴ the statement is true for n = k + 1
Hence by mathematical induction, the statement is true for all positive integers n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

atomi techniques

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

atomi techniques

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

atomi techniques

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

little exam trick
instead of asking for n = all positive integers
they may ask for n = all odd positive integers

A

for all odd integers
inductive step to assume for
n = is k+2 instead of k+1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

general info

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

general sigma notation

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly