Wrongful or Unfair Dismissal Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Procedures for dealing with a complaint

A

Lodged with 21 days Payment of fee FWC are able to determine the eligibility of the application FWC can dismiss applications that are frivolous or vexatious and have no reasonable prospect of success Matter is attempted to be conciliated by FWC Failure moves onto determination by a member FWC makes a formal decision Appeal to a full bench is allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1993 Reforms

A

* Keating introduced first federal legislation * Employers had to show valid reason for termination * Amended: Excluded certain employees from claiming, and put cap on compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1996 Reforms

A

* Howard came to power and amended which barred claims against small business (100 or fewer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Byrne v Australian Airlines

A

Wrongful dismissal may not terminate the contract, but it has the effect of bringing the relationship to an end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2009 Reforms

A

* FW Act removed most of the exclusions * Allow for three types of claim for termination * Part 3-1 - Discrimination and victimization (general protections - about protected rights) * Part 3-2 - Unfair dismissal (restricted to NSE) * Part 6-4 - Unlawful termination (all employees)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Australian Postal v Rashiti

A

Dismissed - Storing and sending porn after being warned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cook v ACI Operations (2011)

A

Employee can pursue unfair dismissal AND discrimination complaint if it is pre-termination conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cunningham v ABS (2005)

A

Cunningham was responsible for managing football tips within the workplace (not an actual employment duty). Alleged he had changed his tips so he could win. There was a valid reason because the employer was harmed by the conduct, because Cunningham was a senior management employee so carried a high degree of trust. Trust and honesty had eroded because of his conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Curro v Beyond Productions

A

Injunction will be granted when the courts are satisfied the employee can find suitable work with another employer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

De Francesco v Barnum (1890)

A

Courts do not want them to become contracts of slavery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

NSW Cancer Council v Sarfaty (1992)

A

No claim can be made for incentives or bonuses that are entirely at the discretion of the employer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exclusions to unfair dismissal claims

A

Earning over $133,000/yr Short term casuals Transferred between related entities Genuine redundancies Fixed term hires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lodging Unlawful Termination

A

* s773-774 - 21 days to bring application * s775 - Payment of fee * s776 - Conference * s779 - Certification of unsuccessful efforts * s777 - Hearing * s772 - Civil remedies * Initially needs to be dealt with by mediation/conciliation * May go to arbitration if fails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Nulty v Blue Star (2011)

A

Ignorance of the right to pursue is not an excuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Patterson v Middle Harbour Yacht Club

A

Mitigation of loss. Any income from another job will be accounted for and deducted from the claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ponce v DJT Staff Management Services

A

Mr Ponce was a traffic controller. One period of about 7 months of employment (even though casuals). Had to establish employment was regular and systematic. FWC found that he was definitely a casual, no published roster, work was dependent on demand (contracts, weather, etc), had periods of not working. Other than that, there was a pattern showing he worked each week, averaging 4.6 days a week on night shift. Spoken to regularly about availability and that things needed to be planned in advance. Based on the facts he was able to show that employment was regular and systematic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reilly v Victoria

A

Only way to be reinstated is to show that mutual trust and confidence remains between the party and the employer is still satisfied about the conduct and competence of the employee

16
Q

Reilly v Praxa (2004)

A

Bonuses and incentives are only counted if they would necessarily have been made

17
Q

Remedies for Employees

A

Unfair Dismissal Claim (cost effective/efficient) Rarely get jobs back, compensation low Wrongful Dismissal (Common Law) Fixed term contracts or high earners

18
Q

Remedies for Employers

A

* Modern awards permit employers to withhold money due on termination * Possible for a bond to be imposed * Injunctive relief: * Greater chance of success is an injunction * This allows the employer to take action to prevent an employee from using or disclosing confidential information

19
Q

Remedies for Unlawful Termination

A

* FWC may order * Re-instatement; or * Uncapped compensation * s778 - Parties can go to court * s779A - Cost orders

20
Q

Remedies: Unfair Dismissal

A

* s390 - Employer may be ordered to reinstate the employee or pay compensation * Reinstatement - Position previously held, or position no less favorable * s391 - Compensate for pay lost between dismissal and reinstatement

21
Q

Road Transport v Gervasoni

A

Dismissed - Disabled limited and speeding

22
Q

s382

A

* National system employees are protected from unfair dismissal * Must have completed the minimum period * 6 months for normal business * 12 months for small business * Employee must be covered by an award or enterprise agreement

23
Q

s385

A

Considered unfair if dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable * FWC must take into account * Valid reason for the dismissal * Notice of reason provided * Opportunity to respond * Receipt of any warnings * Allowance of support person present * Size of the business

25
Q

s386(2)

A

No dismissal when employee is engaged for a specified period, task, season

26
Q

s587

A

FWC can dismiss applications that are frivolous or vexatious and have no reasonable prospect of success

27
Q

s725

A

Prevent multiple applications regarding a dismissal (including general protection claim)

28
Q

s772

A

Prohibits employees form being termination for proscribed reasons * Temporary absence (illness or injury related) * Union membership/non-membership * Seeking or acting as a representative of employees * Alleging employer has violated laws/regulations * Discrimination (age, race, sex) * Taking parental leave

29
Q

s783

A

Onus: Employer must prove employee was not dismissed for proscribed reason

30
Q

Sprigg v Pauls Festival Supermarket

A

Compensation for unfair dismissal. Anything that would have received, “but for” the dismissal.

31
Q

Summary Termination

A

On the spot termination. Account of breach/repudiation

32
Q

Tradition Australia v Gunson (2006)

A

* Courts are reluctant to order specific performance * Reluctant because it would require constant supervision

33
Q

Unfair Dismissal

A

Harsh, unjust or unreasonable termination.

35
Q

University of WA v NTEU (2003)

A

No dismissal where employment contract is frustrated

36
Q

Unlawful Termination

A

Termination that is discriminatory. * Based on external affairs power (beyond constitutional corporation criteria)

37
Q

Why Reinstatement is Difficult

A
  1. Difficult to keep employment contract alive during court proceedings 2. Courts will not make orders of specific performance
38
Q

Wodonga Rural City Council v Lewis

A

Possible for employer to seek a cost order against an applicant for pursuing an untenable claim

39
Q

Woolworths v Brown

A

Mr Brown was a butcher who had been told to remove an eye brow ring. He refused a number of warnings which related to company hygiene policies. Determined there was a valid reason for dismissing Mr Brown.

40
Q

Wrongful Dismissal

A

Claim for breach of contract. Allegation that an employer has terminated without having the power to do so.

41
Q

Wrongful Dismissal: Damages

A

* Damages are meant to put the injured party in the same position as if the contract had been carried out * Therefore, employee can claim for * Loss of wages * Loss of superannuation * Expenses in taking up a new job