Writings and Physical Evidence Flashcards
Authentication
Every item of non-testimonial evidence must be authenticated.
MUST AUTHENTICATE WHEN THE IDENTITY OF THE SPEAKER IS IMPORTANT
Proving what the proponent of that evidence claims it to be
Burden of Proof for Authentication
Sufficient to sustain a finding of genuineness – very low
Admission
Method of authentication. Party against whom it is offered admits its authenticity or acted upon it as authentic
Eyewitness Testimony
Testimony by one who sees the writing executed, hears it said, etc.
Handwriting Verifications
Handwriting may be authenticated by:
(1) opinion by a nonexpert with PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE of the alleged writer’s handwriting
(2) opinion by an expert who has COMPARED the writing to samples of the maker’s handwriting
(3) comparison by the TRIER OF FACT
Ancient Documents
Authenticated if:
(1) at least 20 years old
(2) does not on its face present any irregularities (erasures); and
(3) is found in a place where such a writing would likely be kept
CA: 30 years
Reply Letter Doctrine
writing may be authenticated by evidence that it was written in response to a communication sent to the claimed author
Photographs
May be authenticated if a witness with PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE testifies that the content of the photograph is the same as they saw (must have been present when pic was taken)
Unattended Camera: if photograph taken when no person was present or took the photo, may be admitted if shown that camera was properly operating at the relevant time and that the photo was developed from film obtained in that camera
Voice
voice may be identified by the opinion of anyone who has heard the voice at ANY TIME, including after litigation has begun and for the sole purpose of testifying
Telephone Conversation
authenticated by one of the parties to the call who testifies that:
(1) he recognized the other party’s voice
(2) speaker had knowledge of certain facts that only a particular person would have;
(3) he called a particular person’s number and the voice answered as that person; or
(4) he called a business and talked with the person asnwering the phone about matters relevant to the business
Self authenticating writings
(1) certified copies of public documents bearing a seal (deeds)
(2) acknowledged documents (docs where original signature is attested before a notary,
(3) official publications (government pamphlets);
(4) newspapers, periodicals
(5) commercial paper and related documents
(6) certified business records
(7) certified copies of public records
(8) trade inscriptions (tag or label that purports to have been attached in course of business and indicate control, origin, or ownership)
CA: do not include business records and trade inscriptions
Best Evidence Rule
Applies ONLY if evidence is offered to prove the CONTENTS/TERMS of the writing. usually comes up when the writing is legally operative or if showing the knowledge of a witness concerning a fact results from having read the document
Includes documents, videos, photos, xrays, audio recordings, computer disks, or any tangible collection of data. “LETTERS, WORDS, NUMBERS, or their equivalent, SET DOWN IN ANY FORM”
THE RULE:
Must produce the ORIGINAL (computer printouts and certified copies of public documents are considered originals) or a DUPLICATE (copy of original produced by same impression that produced teh original or by a machine)
Exception: when there is genuine question as to authenticity of original, duplicate may not be used
Testimony regarding contents of writing may be admissible only where original is lost or destroyed, unless bad faith by proponent of testimony
Summary of Voluminous records
exception to best evidence rule. When inconvenient to examine a voluminous collection of writings in court, party can present the contents in the form of a chart or witness summary
Fact exists independent of writing
exception to best evidence rule. When the fact to be proved exists independent of any writing, oral testimony may be given without the original writing
Functions of Court & Jury with best evidence rule
Court determines whether admissible
Jury decides
(1) whether original ever existed
(2) whether the evidence is an original; and
(3) whether the evidence offered correctly reflects the contents of the original