write up Flashcards
MEMORISEEEE
introduction paragraph 1
Reoffending in the UK
Major issue in the UK’s criminal justice system.
High recidivism rates: 48% reoffend within a year, 60% within three years (Ministry of Justice). alarming stats
Compared to Norway: UK = 60%, Norway = 20% → Suggests better rehabilitation abroad. contrast
introduction paragraph 2
Causes of Reoffending
Lack of support → Many offenders struggle with reintegration.
Mental health issues → 80% of prisoners have untreated conditions, increasing reoffending risk.
Socioeconomic disadvantages → Unemployment, housing instability, and lack of social support are key barriers.
Cycle of disadvantage → Lower-income offenders face more obstacles to rehabilitation.
introduction paragraph 3
UK Prison System & Reoffending
Lack of education & skills training → Many offenders leave prison unprepared for employment.
Insufficient rehabilitation programs → Limited support for reintegration into society.
Cycle of crime & punishment → Without intervention, offenders are likely to reoffend.
recommendation 1
Stronger deterrent effect → Stricter punishments may discourage crime.
Extended sentences → Fear of longer jail time might reduce reoffending.
Impact on disadvantaged groups → May act as a warning for at-risk individuals.
recommendation 2
Education & job training → Helps offenders gain employment post-release.
Mental health support → Addresses untreated issues contributing to crime.
Breaking the cycle → Provides disadvantaged offenders with tools for reintegration.
recommendation 3
Alternative to prison → Low-risk offenders placed in structured rehab, restorative justice, or community service.
Address root causes → Helps with addiction, unemployment, and education gaps.
Accountability & reintegration → Allows offenders to take responsibility while rebuilding their lives.
Reduces prison population → Frees up space for high-risk offenders and lowers overall recidivism.
this paper will discus…
Most effective approach → Rehabilitation-focused prisons (education, mental health, employment).
Reasoning → Treats root causes of crime, increases reintegration success, lowers reoffending rates.
recommendation 1 for p1
Intelligence Squared Debate → Argues that tougher prison sentences deter potential offenders by making them fear long-term imprisonment.
Public Awareness & Crime Reduction → Harsher penalties discourage crime by reinforcing consequences.
BBC News Survey → Many young adults support stricter sentences, believing they would prevent reoffending.
Public Perception → Tougher sentencing is widely seen as an effective way to lower crime and deter repeat offenders.
recommendation 1 for p2
Statista Survey (2019) → 70% of the public believed sentences were too lenient, supporting the idea that tougher punishments could deter crime.
EU Referendum Link → 88% of Leave voters thought sentencing was too soft, showing strong concerns over crime and punishment.
University of Law Article → Prison is a severe punishment, stripping individuals of freedom and identity, which can deter crime.
Wider Deterrence Effect → The existence of strict sentencing sends a message to society about the consequences of crime.
recommendation 1 against
Inside Time Article (Source E) → Former prisoners say incarceration did not deter them but reinforced criminal behavior.
Rehabilitation Failure → Prison does not address poverty, addiction, or education, which are key causes of crime.
Reintegration Issues → Ex-offenders struggle to reintegrate into society, increasing their likelihood of reoffending.
The Guardian Article (Source F) → UK has one of the highest incarceration rates in Western Europe, yet reoffending remains high.
Alternative Approach → Resources should be focused on rehabilitation and social support rather than harsher prison conditions.
recommendation 2 for p1
College of Policing Research (Source G) → Education and training in prisons significantly reduce reoffending rates.
Employment Impact → Prisoners who participate in education programs are 13% more likely to find jobs after release.
House of Commons Education Committee (Source H) → 57% of prisoners have English and Maths skills below an 11-year-old level.
School Exclusion & Crime → Over 40% of prisoners were permanently excluded from school, limiting future job opportunities.
Rehabilitation Focus → Investing in education can break the cycle of crime and improve public safety.
recommendation 2 for p2
Norway’s Recidivism Rate → 20% of ex-convicts reoffend within two years, compared to the UK’s 46%.
Prison Reform Success → In the 1990s, Norway’s recidivism was 70%, but reforms focusing on rehabilitation reduced this drastically.
Rehabilitation Approach → Norway prioritizes education, mental health support, and employment training over punishment.
First Step Alliance Report (Source I) → Successful reintegration starts from the moment prisoners enter the system.
Comparison to UK → Shifting focus to rehabilitation leads to long-term benefits for individuals and society.
recommendation 2 against
Public Perception Issue → Some argue that providing free education to inmates is unfair when law-abiding citizens struggle to afford higher education.
Resentment Among the Public → Critics believe offering prison education rewards criminals with opportunities many hardworking individuals cannot access.
Punishment Over Rehabilitation → The argument states that offenders should face consequences rather than receive benefits.
Psychology Today (Source J) → Highlights concerns that rehabilitation-focused policies may be perceived as too lenient on criminals.
recommendation 3 for p1
Sentencing Council’s Report (Source K) → Community sentences are highly effective for offenders with rehabilitation needs (e.g., mental health, addiction).
Lower Reoffending Rates → Offenders in community programs are less likely to reoffend than those given short-term prison sentences.
Scottish Government’s Policy (Source L) → Community sentences provide access to support services like healthcare, housing, and rehab.
More Individualized Approach → Tailored rehabilitation programs help address the root causes of crime.
Cost-Effective and Beneficial → Community sentencing is more effective and cheaper than traditional imprisonment.
recommendation 3 for p2
Overcrowding Crisis (Source M) → UK prison population has nearly doubled in 30 years, causing overcrowding, understaffing, and lack of rehabilitation.
Impact on Reoffending → Poor prison conditions interfere with rehabilitation, contributing to high reoffending rates.
Alternative: Community Sentencing (Source N) → Intensive Supervision Courts offer mandatory drug/alcohol treatment under judicial oversight.
Effectiveness → 75% of participants comply, with significant reductions in drug use and reoffending.
Conclusion → Community alternatives tackle root causes of crime better than short-term imprisonment.
recommendation 3 against
Concern Over Community Sentencing (Source O) → Not all offenders benefit from community-based interventions, especially serious or violent criminals.
Public Confidence in Justice → Alternative sentences may be perceived as too lenient, potentially undermining trust in the system.
Role of Traditional Imprisonment → For certain offenders, prison may be necessary to ensure public safety and reinforce accountability.
Conclusion → While community sentences work for some, they may not be a suitable replacement for short-term imprisonment in all cases.
methodology
Gov.scot (Scottish Government Website) → Highly reliable due to official status, backed by governmental research and verified data.
Psychology Today → Partially reliable; while reputable for psychological insights, it presents opinion-based arguments rather than factual data.
Potential Bias in Psychology Today → Lack of statistical evidence and reliance on subjective perspectives could introduce bias into analysis.
Overall Evaluation → Government sources are generally more trustworthy, while opinion-based sources should be assessed critically.
conclusion
Most Effective Approach → Recommendation 2: Rehabilitation over punishment.
Why? → Supported by credible evidence showing education & skill-building programs reduce reoffending.
Addresses Root Causes → Tackles lack of education, employment skills, and mental health issues.
Long-Term Impact → Offers sustainable crime reduction, unlike punitive measures.
Comparison with Other Approaches → Harsher punishments (Option 1) and community sentencing (Option 3) have benefits but lack long-term effectiveness.
Overall Conclusion → Rehabilitation best improves public safety and reduces recidivism.
