Wk 2 - Standardisation Flashcards
Why do we bother engaging in the scientific method to study psychology (x2),
And what does human measurement have to do with this? (x1)
Because ‘natural psych’/intuition is often wrong
Need to verify which is right/wrong
Measurement is fundamental to all science, therefor human measurement is to psych
Some twat collars you at a party and says psychology is crap. Generate your own withering put down to make them feel inconsequential and stupid, using three examples of counter-intuitive psychology findings.
Marilyn vos Savant: crazy IQ, said that when you have already chosen one envelope, and experimenter opens another, you would then have more chance of winning content if you swapped with presenter (intuition says it should be 50/50, but not - because presenter always knows where cheque is, and won’t open that one)
Milgram’s obedience experiments: psych students said 1/100 would zap other to death, psychiatrists said 1/1000 - reality was 7/10
Zechmeister/Shaughnessy’s massed vs distributive practice: most believe the former will give better results, but actually the latter
Define psychometrics (x1)
The science of human measurement
Define ‘psychological test’ (x1)
a measuring device or procedure designed to measure psychology-related variables
What are the four key assumptions behind psychological tests?
People differ on traits – e.g. if most Ps get similar scores in test, test is meaningless, and/or perhaps construct doesn’t exist
Traits are measurable – but perhaps we don’t yet have good tool for measuring it
Traits are relatively stable over time - other factors, e.g. fatigue, vary, but many psych things, e.g. IQ, are pretty stable
Traits relate to actual behaviour – no point if it doesn’t predict anything about real world behaviour
Describe how you might go about finding information on a particular psychological test (x4)
Look up library website for info on e.g Mental Measurements Yearbook (Buros) and EST collection
Search library for books on individual tests, or texts on psych testing
Academic journals
Publishers’ catalogues – found via Buros listing
What is a raw score? (x2)
The value given in response to a test -
Before any kind of processing that determines meaning
What are the advantages of standardising a measure?
Allows interpretation - was score high or low?
Gives ability for contextualised interpretation - standardised scores can be compared against appropriate sample of other people
Give some examples of the sort of populations that could make up a standardisation sample under different contexts (x 3)
Can’t use Mark’s obs chart for kids - was designed for adults, with e.g. different blood pressure norms
May also compare to similar age, nation, state, global, uni, school
Or specific categories, e.g. Australian drivers, occupation, females, fathers
Explain what a norm and a normative sample are (x2)
The norm is the distribution given by the data from large number of test Ps, giving us the
Normative sample - the reference to which we relatively standardise our raw scores
What issues we might need to consider when recruiting a standardisation sample? (x4)
Stability doesn’t guarantee representativeness!
May also need same:
Male/female ratio, age/ocio-economic/educational distribution, pattern of geographic origins, etc.
So that it is representative of the population of interest
What’s the advantage of having a big standardisation sample? (x2)
In order to give:
Stability - outliers get swamped, so mean of any subsample doesn’t jump around all over the place
Representative - mean and SD more likely to be accurate
Why is the normal curve useful in psychology? (x3)
Because many psych tests scores approximate a normal curve,
Meaning we need just the mean and SD to define any point on the curve (see how a score compares with all others), and
Allowing powerful parametric tests, over crude non-parametric ones
By what other names might you hear the normal curve described? (x2)
Bell curve
Laplace-Gauss curve
What is the general definition of cognitive impairment – and what is notable about the properties of this definition?
I.Q. of 2 s.d. or more below the mean (= 100, s.d. = 15; so it’s an I.Q. of less than 70).
Which makes cognitive impairment purely relative - its a comparison with the rest of the population
ie if population starts to score higher, those at the lower end have to try harder to avoid classification of impairment
Why might we like the distribution of a measure to be normal? (x2)
Can do more powerful statistical tests, e.g. ANOVA, t test
Makes scales more comparable
What are the different strategies we can use to make a skewed distribution normal? (x2)
Redesign test items - e.g. to remove floor/ceiling effects (e.g. use precise wording to change from all drivers saying they drive fast, to differing proportions declaring different driving speeds)
Use non-linear transformations - square roots, logarithms
What are standard scores and why do we use them? (x5)
z scores (also called normal score) Linear transformations that are Used to anchor mean and SD, so we can: Know meaning of score, without knowledge of original scale, and Compare different scales
What are the means and standard deviations of a z score?
0
1
What are the means and standard deviations of a T score?
50
10
What are the means and standard deviations of an IQ score?
100
15
How do you calculate a z score? (x1)
Raw score, minus the mean, divided by the standard deviation
Describe what linear transforms are (x1)
Plus two examples
Those that don’t change the shape of the histogram
z and T scores
Describe what non-linear transforms are (x2)
Plus two examples
Those that change the shape of the histogram -
Stretch some areas more than others
Square roots and logarithms
When might you want to use linear or non-linear transformations over the other? (x2)
If your data is normal, stick to linear to keep it that way/allow powerful parametric
If skewed, non-linear to try and correct (and avoid using non-parametric tests)