Wk 1- taking a history and WK2 physical AX obs, active mvts, overpressire Flashcards
4 main components of taking a pt hx?
- outline their hx process
- know info needed under each heading. eg HPC, sx hx, med hx
- communication good- rapport. engagement
- make meaning of info collected. detective- give clues
Describe the model of pain and disability? 3 marks
Biopsychosocial model
- Pain is an output rather than an input. Has to be reviewed with our internal models + past experiences. and External environment, as threatened situations can heightened/exaggerate the actual nociception drive to a greater painful perceived experience.
David Butler: “we have pain when we weigh the world and make the judgment that there is danger > safety.
Describe pain and LBP disability relationship?
Complex phenomenon.
- LBP related disabilities those lacking self-efficacy and heightened fear of injury
- behaviour reflects their perception to fitness, movement and exercise (rehab).
How do we know if our PT test actually work?
We don’t in the clinically environment
has to be done in clinical trials with controlled groups carefully blinded.
cannot interfere from own practice in the clinic. To many external and internal fxs altering the reliability of the tests and validity
Draw out Clinically reasoning table and actually try and understand it? be honest yeh
pg 7 or in spinal folder
List the 5 steps in clinical reasoning process (5 marks)
- Functional limitations and problems
- Is Pt suitable for this pt?
- What is the dominant pain type?
- What impairment in function is driving the local sensitivity?
- What biopsychosocial fxs are maintaining the disorder?
STEP ONE FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS and PROBLEMS describe?
Central reasoning point: find their functional goals
- good awareness of their situation (eg. sport + work) build engagement + rapport
Goal: bring back fx pain free completion of tasks
Outcome Measure: PSFS (Patient-specific functional scale) 0/10
“What are 3 activities important to you have difficulty performing as a result of this problem”
0 unable to perform
10 pre-injury state
record- re-test in future sessions.
Other OMs
- use back pain disability questionnaire
and Quebec Back pain disability scale
STEP 2: is PT suitable for my patient?
= red flags
80% of all LBP present with at least x1 RF
need to be aware don’t jump to conclusions
- made with clinical imaging and blood tests. once conclusive or suspcision able to refer to others. eg. GP
List 6 RF’S types give x4 for each
Hint neuro: think of injury to S.C
- Fracture:
Acute presentation
- Post trauma
-multi-directional provocation
osteoporis risk: family, age (50 and 70+++), steriod use, female,low BMI, metabolic disease. - bony tenderness
-high severity
- Infection risk:
acute and sub acute presentations
- HIV positive
- Post surgery (invasive procedures)
- immunosuppressed
- Fevers
- Night sweats
- Recent infection (Hx) eg-UTI
- Cirrhosis (liver disease)
- Cancer:
sub actute pres
- night pain
- family (hereditary)
- Insidious onset
- Loss of weight unexplained
- Past history of Cancer +++
- Age > 50 yrs
- non-mechanical
- constant pain
- unwell systematically
- Neurological risk:
acute presentation - Bilateral distribution - multiple spinal lvl impacted - bladder, bowel dysfx - saddle ana and parathesia sock and glove para and anesthesia clumsiness falls and tripping hyperreflexia ( UMN lesion) cannot inhibit circuit Progressive weakess ++ PAUL BROADLEY sever weakness
- Inflammatory risk:
persistent episodic pain - slow innsidous onset - morning stiffnes 30 min duration -morning worst time - wake up seocnd half of night d/t pain - eased with activity -NSAIDS help +++ - family hx -infection as a trigger swollen peripheral jts - a significant loss of thoracic range
- NON SPINAL pathology
- abdominal aortic aneurysm:
over 60, syncope, smoker, PVD, abdominal pain
- renal -kidney stones
- gynecological
-
4.
True or false? urgent care if CES and abdominal aortic aneurysm
TRUE
When can PT be used with other health professionals?
Systemic inflammatory disorder.
PT not the solution but care to maintain physical fx as high as possible within the steady of the disease.
STEP 3 (WHAT IS THE DOMINANT PAIN TYPE???)
Musck pain divided into 3 types
- Noc…
- Perip…
- ….. Sensitisation
give 2 points for each
a) nociceptive:
- intermittent and sharp with mvt (mechanical)
- localised to the area of injury
clear aggrevating and easing fxs linked to mechanical/anatomical nature.
- Pain described: sharp, burning,
- Night pain
- antalgic (pain relieveing) postures eg. lumbar into post tilt against wall eases. == control issues= lack capacity
b) peripheral neuropathic:
- Hx of nerve injury
- clear dermatomal pattern
- pain with neural provocation tests NDT eg. SLR, median tests
c) central sensitisation
- pain is disproportionate to the nature/triggers
- unpredictable, non mechanical
- biopyschosocial factors heighten the painful output experience. (maladaptive beliefs)- neg feelings, poor coping strategies, fear of mvt, poor self efficacy
LIST the 3 CATEGORIES OF DOMINANT PAIN TYPES
- somatic (nociceptive)
- Neurogenic (neuropathic pain)
- Nociplastic pain type (C.S)
Define somatic pain type (1 mark)
What are the 2 ASPECTS needed to be investigated when looking at somatic pain patients? (2 marks)
List components of each of these ASPECTS (8 marks) 1 for each
Somatic pain is pain linked with actual damage to somatic structures.
- INPUT DOMINANT
- well defined area
- mechanical
- position of ease
- standard hx
- clear stimulus relationship. PREDICTABLE and CONISTENT response pt loading
2. INVOLVING SOMATIC TISSUE Deep Aching quality Usually dull (though may become severe) Static in location Expand slowly if stimulus increases Aware of where centred but hard to localise boundaries Less often below the knee Non tender in referred area After pain uncommon Latent pain uncommon Generally closely related to back pain
LBP is the main problem
- Deep aching pain
- LBP can be “Sharp and catching”- careful here
- referred pain is less serve- more localised
- LBP well localised
Qualities of referred pain when a SOMATIC problem that matter most when differentiating from NEUROGENIC PAIN (8 marks). LIST x8
Deep Aching quality Usually dull (though may become severe) Static in location Expand slowly if stimulus increases Aware of where centred but hard to localise boundaries Less often below the knee Non tender in referred area After pain uncommon Latent pain uncommon Generally closely related to back pain
Can imaging be helpful or bad?
Good- diagnosis for acute and injury that can be backed up clinically.
Bad- false positivies. give a visual objective reason to pt that they are ‘broken’
Therefore, need extreme caution when using imaging on chronic LBP patients due to tendency of false positives.
Define neurogenic pain?
List point of INPUT DOMINANT AND NEURAL TISSUE INVOLVED - 3 EACH
- ** all input dominant are the same***
hint: neural tissue split into two parts and give x1 association
Neurogenic pain: pain from a lesion along the peripheral nervous system eg. nerve. Meaing the pain experience is from:
a) input domiant mechanisms
b) nervous tissue is the primary tissue
INPUT domiant PAIN patient:
- well defined area
- clear anatomical pattern
- mechanical
- pain experience proportionate to the internsity of stimulus load
- position of ease
Neural TISSE INVOLVED:
- LEG PAIN IF:
- deep and aching
- cfelt along the path of the nerve
- dragging pain
- pulling pain
- clumping along nerve path
associated with mild-non dermatomal parathesia
== RADICULAR PAIN ONLY
- LEG PAIN IF:
- sharp and shooting
- stabbing
- burining
- gripping pain
- felt in sensory distribution of pain
associated with LOCALISED altered alloydynia, hyperalgesia, para + anathesia, weakness
=== ONLY RADICULOPATHIC PAIN
Don’t be too quick to jump to neurogenic pain if radiating pain from a somatic type patient. Likely can be non-neural structure in the back.
But if nerve sensitisation: INVESTIGATE : 1. quality 2. distribution 3. behaviour of this referral nerve pain
MATTERS> somatic back pain. why? generally leg nerve pain is worse than LBP somatic pain. leg pain common to radiate below knee
KEY:
- localised - somatic
- referred pain + LBP (loacalised) investigate if neurogenic pain is a contributor
DIFFERENTIATE with central and lateral canal problems give example
either degenerative or acute- in lecture watch
Central CP:
eg. acute central canel MEDICAL EMERGENCY: cauda equina syndrome
Lateral canal problem:
Need to identify nerve root the nerve is sensitised from.
Define neoplastic pain.
What are the two categories of nociplastic pain?
- neuromodulatory dysfunction
- psychological maladaption
Follows the ideology of central sensitisation, where the input dominant mechanisms are not the primary driver, rather the scruntisation pathways altering the internal models of an invidual. Leading to greater Prediction error (PEM) which catastrophises the original stimulus to a great painful experience.
Nociplastic pain type:
- Neuromodulatory pain
- Perisitrent high levels of pain
- never pain free
- extreme fatigue
- cannot sleep in pain free state
- widespread alloydnia
- widespread hyperalegisa
- spontaneous pain - Psychological pain (A-E)
- emotions driver the pain
- anxiety and depression major driver
- negative attitudes and expectations (fear of mvt)
- unhelpful self behaviours: increased rest, withdrawl of activity, social withdrawl, drug and alchol use to cope
- rely in passive reatements
- POOR family and friends network
Body image- social media
mood anger, beliefs brought up with dealing with injury
negative headspace/thoughts/expectations
= inpit mechanisms play a role but the PSYCH maladaption is PRIMARY DRIVER
BOOM BUST APPROACH !!!!!!
Give an outcome measure to identify central sensitisation/nociplastic patients
hint questionnaire
Central sensitisation inventory