WJEC teleological argument Flashcards

1
Q

What was Plato’s version of the argument from design?

A

The universe, he proposes, is the product of rational, purposive, and beneficent agency. It is the handiwork of a divine Craftsman (The“Demiurge,” dêmiourgos, ), who imposes mathematical order on a preexistent chaos to generate the ordered universe (kosmos).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did Aristotle argue from design?

A

Aristotle conceives “nature” as having order and intelligence, an integrated system, as if it were designed: If, therefore, artificial products are for the sake of an end, so clearly also are natural products”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did Aquinas use the arrow analogy in his “fifth way”?

A

An arrow, which has no intelligence (knowledge) of its own, needs an archer to direct it on its course. So those things in nature which have no knowledge (planets, plants etc.) also need some intelligent being to direct them to fulfil their purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does Paley use the rock and watch analogy?

A

If you came across a rock, you could say it had lain there forever, but you could not say the same about a watch. You can see evidence of design in its interconnecting parts, even if you didn’t know its purpose. You would conclude that it had been designed for a purpose. There is much more evidence of design in nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Complete Paley’s quote “the marks of design ………”

A

The marks of design are too strong to be got over. Design must have had a designer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Paley mean by “The contrivances of nature surpass the contrivances of art, in the complexity, subtlety, and curiosity of the mechanism”?

A

The workings of nature are far more complex and wonderful than any machine made by man.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the name of the person AND the name of the argument associated with human appreciation of beauty in the world?

A

F R Tennant and the Aesthetic argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Summarise the aesthetic argument.

A

Appreciation of all forms of beauty does not appear to have a survival function, therefore one would think it should be rejected in evolutionary development. That it hasn’t been, is evidence that God wanted humans to enjoy living in the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give three terms that are associated with the idea that the conditions in parts of the universe are just right for intelligent human life.

A

Anthropic Principle; Fine-tuning argument; Goldilocks Zone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Summarise the anthropic principle

A

The chances of a universe providing the exact conditions necessary for human life are so tiny as to be highly improbable. The simplest conclusion is that it was the result of a deliberate decision by a divine designer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does the fine-tuning argument develop the anthropic principle.

A

It looks in detail at the event called the “big bang” and shows that if any variable had been just a tiny bit different in the first nano-seconds, there would either be nowhere in the universe to sustain life, or no universe at all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were Tennant’s 3 pieces of evidence to support

his anthropic principle?

A

P.28.

  1. The world provides the exact things we need to survive.
  2. The world can be observed, and holds itself up for rational analysis from which we can deduce its workings.
  3. The process of evolution through natural selection has led to the development of intelligent human life which can observe and analyse the universe it exists in.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Summarise Hume’s “Analogies” criticism.

A

The degree of similarity between the universe and a man made object is too small to make a valid analogy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Summarise Hume’s “Experience” analogy.

A

Humans have no experience of how the universe was designed, so any analogy made with something we DO have experience of is invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Summarise Hume’s “Organic Universe” criticism.

A

The universe is not static, like a man made machine (in Hume’s day). It behaves more like living organisms in the natural world, so can’t be easily compared to an artificial construction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Summarise Hume’s “Poor Design” criticism.

A

Even if we could assume a designer, who can say this universe is a good design, as we have no other to compare it too. Who could say there were not botched and bungled attempts at designing universes before this one? (This is more an attack on the belief that God is omnipotent and benevolent.)

17
Q

Summarise Hume’s “Apparent Design” criticism.

A

In his “Dialogues concerning Natural Religion”, Hume’s own views are expressed by the character Philo who refers to Epicurus

18
Q

Summarise Hume’s “Many Builders” criticism.

A

A house or a ship, or any man-made project has many people involved in the construction. It would be a better analogy therefore to say there were many beings involved in the creation of the universe. Hume is pointing out that human analogies do not always work in the way theists want.

19
Q

Summarise Hume’s “Absent Designer” criticism.

A

When a man-made construction is finished, the designer moves on to another job, and will eventually die. The use of such analogies does not mean there is an everlasting God who is still present.

20
Q

How did Kant criticise the teleological argument?

A

We can only make conclusions about that which we can observe. As no one made any observations about the origins of the universe, including whether or not it was designed, to conclude it was designed is invalid.

21
Q

How did J S Mill criticise the Teleological argument?

A

Nature contains so much destruction that it is difficult to conclude it could have been designed for humans by a benevolent God. Either there is no God, or he is incompetent or immoral.
“Nearly all things which men are hanged or imprisoned for are nature’s everyday performances”.
“Anarchy and the reign of terror are overmatched in injustice, ruin and death by a hurricane and a pestilence”.

22
Q

Summarise the challenge arising from the discovery of evolution through natural selection.

A

The appearance of design can be explained by the idea that organisms adapted to their environment, rather than having been designed for it. There is no purpose in evolution except to reproduce. There is no need for any intelligence behind the process.