Wills: Validity Flashcards
What are the requirements to make a valid will?
- Must be over 18 (except those in military service)
And have: - testamentary capacity
- knowledge and approval
- formal requirements of 29 Wills Act 1837
What are the requirements for testamentary capacity?
Set out in Banks v Goodfellow:
- Understand the nature of the act and its effects
- understand they are signing a document that takes effect on death and disposes of their property but need not understand every detail - Appreciate the extent of the property of which they are disposing
- should have a general recollection of what they own and approximate value of their estate and assets
- need not recall every item or recall precise value of each. - Appreciate any moral claims and have no mental impairments
- appreciate anyone to whom they may feel obligated to leave money (children)
- can have impairment but fine to have one if they still understand the will
When must a testator have testamentary capacity?
At the time the will is executed!
Exception: Parker v Felgate
Parker v Felgate
This is a case which established an exception so that a testator who lacks testamentary capacity at the time of execution can still make a valid will provided they:
- Had testamentary capacity at the time they gave instructions for the preparation of the will; and
- the will was prepared in accordance with those instructions
- at the time of execution the testator understood they were signing a will for which they had previously given instructions
may apply where capacity fluctuates over time or an unexpected event occurs.
What is the golden rule?
The golden rule states that when taking instructions from a client who is elderly or seriously ill a medical practitioner should be instructed to make an assessment of the testator’s capacity and a record of the assessment and its conclusions should be made.
Not a legal obligation but is considered best practice.
Presumption of capacity
Low threshold to satisfy Banks v Goodfellow.
Capacity will be presumed if the will appears rational and has been duly executed.
Anyone who wishes to challenge this must provide evidence to raise doubt. If the presumption is rebutted the the burden of proof will shift to the propounder of the will to demonstrate the testator satisfied Banks v Goodfellow.
Statutory Wills
The court can authorise the execution of a will on behalf of someone who lacks capacity.
The court must be persuaded that:
- there are grounds to diverge from existing position (intestacy or significant change)
- it is in the person’s best interest to do so
Knowledge and approval
A testator must read their will and understand it, and by their signature intend to give effect to its terms.
A testator must have a specific intention to make the particular will they sign. This means they must know and approve of its contents and understand the choices they have made. Therefore a testator can have capacity but lack knowledge and intention.
Presumption of knowledge and approval
Knowledge and approval are presumed if the testator had testamentary capacity and the will was executed in accordance with the requirements of s9 Wills Act 1837.
If there is evidence which raises doubt as to knowledge and approval, the presumption is rebutted and the burden shifts to those seeking to enforce the will.
When is there no presumption of knowledge and approval?
- The testator is blind or illiterate
- The Will was signed by someone on behalf of the testator
- There are suspicious circumstances
What do you do if there is no presumption of knowledge and approval?
If there is no presumption and the attestation clause does not address this - then you will need an affidavit of knowledge and approval when submitting the Will to probate.
Attestation Clause
An attestation clause confirms knowledge and approval. It can be altered to reflect steps taken to ensure a testator fully understands the document they were signing.
e.g. signed by x on behalf of t or read outloud to t by x
What is undue influence on a will?
Occurs where the testator is coerced into making a will or including particular terms against their judgement and contrary to their intention. They have no genuinely exercised a choice.
It goes beyond persuasion. Persuasion is not unlawful. The line between them is not always clear.
How does one prove undue influence?
Burden of proof lies with the person making the allegation and must have evidence.
Facts must be consistent with any other hypothesis. This is often very difficult to show.
Courts will consider the physical and mental strength of the testator.
Question: did the testator act as a free agent?
Effect of undue influence on the will
If a will is made as a result of undue influence or duress it will not be valid because the will does not reflect the testator’s true intention.
May be a particular gift or the will of as a whole.
If part of the will - the rest of the will will remain in effect so long as the omission does not upset the rest of the will.