Wills & Trusts Flashcards
Wills Checklist/ Roadmap
- Validity – Execution and Capacity
- Revocation
- Components of a Will
- Construction and Interpretation
- Intestate Succession
- Rights of Surviving Spouse and Children
- Bars to Succession
Valid Will– Execution Requirements
An attested will must:
- be in writing (no oral wills)
- signed by the Testator (or another person in T’s presence & at his direction)
- signing/ acknowledgement of T’s signature must be done in presence of 2 witnesses, both present at the same time
- witnesses must sign the will during testators life and
- witnesses must understand that the instrument they sign is T’s will
Witnesses Signatures
For testators dying on or after January 1, 2009, if the will doesn’t meet the witnessing requirement (both witnesses see T’s signing or acknowledgement @ the same time) it can still be admitted to probate if proponent establishes by clear and convincing evidence that T intended the doc to constitute his will @ time of signing
Interested Witness
witness is interested if they receive something under the will more than they would receive in intestacy
If a witness is interested there is a presumption of undue influence & If the IW does not overcome this presumption, they only get intestate share and rest goes to the residue.
Holographic Instruments
a holographic instrument is an entirely or partially handwritten instrument
Valid if signature & all material provisions are in the T’s handwriting. No need for witness.
material provisons– name of executors & trustees, ID of bequests, declaration that instrument is a will, & signature
Capacity Issues
negate testamentary capacity & invalidate gift/ disposition
4 Capacity Issues:
- undue influence (common law presumption of UI, standard UI, & statutory UI)
- insane delusion
- fraud
- mistake
Common Law Presumption of Undue Influence
presumption arises if beneficiary:
- is in a confidential relationship with the T;
- participates in some way in procuring the gift; AND
- the gift is an unnatural bequest that favors the beneficiary
If presumption is not overcome, the gift fails
Statutory Undue Influence
arises when beneficiary is:
- attorney
- caregiver
- person who drafts instruments OR
- person in fiduciary relationship & transcribes the instrument
There is a presumption that gift procured through undue influence UNLESS beneficiary is blood relative
if presumption not overcome, gift fails
Standard Undue Influence
In absence of common law presumption, challenger must show:
- there was influence exerted on T
- the effect of influence was to overpower free will & mind of T
- product of the influence was a will which would otherwise have not been executed but for the influence
FACTORS: T was vulnerable, B’s relationship gave them opportunity, B used tactics designed to exert UI, gift to B was inequitable
Insane Delusion
T had an insane delusion & but for the insane delusion the specific bequest would not have been made
Fraud
(in the execution & inducement)
fraud in the execution: where a T is misled into executing the instrument by false representations concerning the character or content of an instrument (led to believe its something other than a will)
fraud in the inducement: where a T is misled into executing the instrument by false representations concerning outside facts that influence his motivation
Mistake
(in the execution & inducment)
mistake in the execution: mistake as to the character of the doc. Can’t be probated
mistake in the inducement: based on mistaken belief of untrue facts. no relief unless fact of the mistake & disposition testator would have otherwise made is on the face of the instrument
Revocation
occurs by:
- subsequent will
- physical act (i.e., tearing, blotting, burning)
- by operation of law (e.g., divorce)
Revival
when will #2 revokes will #1 & then will 2 is revoked by physical act, will 1 will only be revived IF:
from the circumstances of the revocation OR from T’s contemporaneous/ subsequent declarations, its evident that T intended will #1 to be revived by revoking will 2
Dependent Relative Revocation
cancels a revocation that was based on mistaken assumption of law or fact that new disposition, made concurrently is valid.
Ct will give effect to revoked portion if its consistent w/ T’s testamentary intent (would the T rather the gift lapse or cancel revocation)
Codicil
amends a prior will & requires same formalities as a will.
To the extent that the rest of will is not changed, it is deemed to speak as of the date of the codicil, so unaltered portions are republished by the codicil
Integration
will consists of all papers or writings actually present at the time of execution & that the T intended to physically constitute her will
(presence/intent presumed when papers are physically connected, e.g. stapled)
Incorporation by Reference
requires that the
- incorporated writing be in existence as of the date of execution of the will
- will shows testator’s intent to incorporate the writing &
- incorp writing sufficiently described in the will
Acts of Independent Significance
permits a court to resolve ambiguities in a will by referring to certain docs OR acts effectuated during the T’s lifetime which were created/done for primarily non-testamentary motives
“to Church I am member of at time of death” – ambiguity as to what church that was so need to reference stuff outside of will to figure that out
Interpretation – Ambiguity in Will
whether latent (not on face of will) or patently (on face of will), extrinsic evidence will be admissible to explain the ambiguity
Specific Legacy
a gift of a particular item of property distinct from all other objects in the T’s estat
if specific legacy, look for issues of:
- accretion,
- ademption,
- lapse &
- anti-lapse