Wills & Trusts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Nonprobate property

A

Property that does not pass through probate and is not governed by will or intestacy.

(1) Inter vivos gift - property person has already given away. Includes gifts to living trust.
(2) Remainder interests + executory interests. Remainder beneficiary receives upon life estate holder’s death.
(3) Co-ownership of property:
-Tenancy in common –> decedent’s share passes through estate.
-Joint tenancy –> decedent’s share passes to surviving joint tenant.
(4) Pay/transfer-on-death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intestate succession

A

Intestacy occurs when person dies without a will (total intestacy) or had a will but the will did not dispose of all property (partial intestacy).

Heirs: persons who take by intestacy.

Applicable law:
-Marital rights –> law of domicile when property acquired (inception of title rule).
-Succession rights –> if personal property, law of domicile at death. If real property, law of suits (location of land).

Spouse’s intestate share varies by state:
-May be percentage like 1/3 or 1/2 of estate
-Share may vary depending on number of children or length of marriage

After spouse, the property goes to descendants, i.e. persons related to decedent in descending lineal line such as children and grandchildren.
-If all children survive, they receive equal shares (per capita share).
-Three methods of computing the shares in cases where some of the descendants are deceased, property is split across generations, etc.:

-(1) Per stirpes distribution (minority): divide into shares at first generation below decedent. Create one share for each surviving child (if child is predeceased, they don’t get a share) and one share for each predeceased child who left living descendants. Give each surviving child one share. Give share created for predeceased child to child’s descendants (split it b/w the child’s descendants).

(2) Per capita with representation distribution: divide estate at first generation WITH SURVIVING MEMBERS (at least 1). Each living person at that level takes a share. Share of deceased person at that level passes to issue.

(3) Per capita at each generational level distribution (adopted by Uniform Probate Code): divide estate into shares at first generation with survivors. Pool shares of lower generation so that each person of that generation receives equal share. I.e. everyone in same generation gets equal share.

If no descendants (post-spouse distribution), property will generally pass to ancestors and collaterals.
-Ancestors: persons related in ascending lineal line such as parents and grandparents.
-Collaterals: persons related but not in a lineal line such as siblings, aunts, and uncles.
-Estate passes in following order: parents –> sibling (varies by state; e.g. if one parents and at least one sibling survive, some states give entire estate to parent; other states give one-half to parent and one-half to siblings) –> grandparents and their descendants (aunts, uncles, cousins).

Adopted people:
-Adopted child inherits from adoptive parents.
-Whether adopted child inherits from biological parents varies by state.
-Adoptive parents inherit from adopted child; biological parents do not (in any state).
Adoption by estoppel may permit child to inherit, but generally, stepchildren have no inheritance rights.
-In most states, age when person was adopted does not matter.

Nonmarital children:
-Always inherit from mother.
-Inherit from father if state requirements met (such as determination of paternity via DNA testing).

Half blooded siblings: siblings with one common parent.
-Most states do not distinguish b/w half bloods and whole bloods.

Posthumous child: child born after death of a parent (e.g. father died before child was born).
-Strict approach: baby must be in utero at the time of death and then born alive, and then are an heir.
-Lax approach: child born within 18 months/2 years/etc . of the death, can still claim to be an heir.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Advancement

A

Lifetime gift intended by donor as prepayment of intestate share. E.g. Parent has two children. Gives Child 1 and advancement of $10k. Parent dies with a $20k estate. Distribution: Child 1 gets $5k from the estate and Child 2 receives $15k. You take the estate and pretend the advancement is still in it. Evens out the net shares.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Survival

A

How long must an heir outlive the intestate to be able to claim a share?
-Some states: heir can survive for any amount of time.
-UPC: heir must survive by 120 hours.
-No survival: heir treated as predeceased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Requirements of disclaimer

A

-In writing
-Signed by person disclaiming (i.e. heir refusing to accept their share)
-Acknowledged in front of notary
-Timely filed
-Modern view: can disclaim at any time as long as no acceptance or use of benefits from gift.

Effect of disclaimer: treat person who disclaimed as dying first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If heir or beneficiary kills decedent

A

-Slayer statute precludes killer from inheriting or being beneficiary
-Court can impose constructive trust

Courts do a balancing if death is by something lesser, e.g. negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Execution of wills

A

Since wills are a privilege, you must generally comply with all requirements to pass on property through a will.

Applicable law:
-Real property –> law of situs
-Personal property –> law of domicile at death
-Savings statute –> will valid if it complies with local law, law where it was executed, or law of decedent’s domicile at death or will execution.

Requirements of will validity:
-Legal capacity: in most states, person must be at least 18 years old.
-Testamentary capacity: “sound mind” requirement. Testator must understand what they’re doing; must understand effect of what testator is doing; understand nature and extent of property (doesn’t have to be perfectly precise); recognize natural objects (family members) of testator’s bounty; ability to do the above at the same time. Adjudication of incompetence –> rebuttable presumption of lack of capacity.
-Testamentary intent: testator intended instrument to be will.
-Formalities:
-(i) attested will: in writing; signed by testator or proxy (most states don’t mandate location of the sig); doesn’t have to be dated; attestation - two witnesses (states vary whether interested witness loses gift); usually must witness in testator’s conscious presence. Attestation clause recites elements of execution and is prima facie evidence of proper execution.
-(ii) holographic will: written in testator’s handwriting; must be signed and dated by testator; no witness requirement in some states; how much must be in testator’s handwriting varies by state - majority rule: virtually everything; minority rule: only material provisions.
-(iii) noncupative/oral will: abolished in most states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Classification of gifts

A

Devise: gift of real property.

Bequest: gift of personal property. Specific bequest: property distinguishable from rest of testator’s estate.

Specific bequest of general nature is not distinguishable from rest of estate, e.g. “I leave my computer at the time of death.”

Legacy: gift of personal property not sufficiently described to be specific (usually money).

Demonstrative legacy: gift of specific sum of money payable out of designed fund. E.g. “I leave $10k to the beneficiary from my account at Bank X.”

Residuary gift: gift of remainder of estate after all debts and other gifts are paid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Changes in beneficiaries and property after will execution

A

Ademption: gift fails because property is no longer in testator’s estate (e.g. already given away, stolen, destroyed). Beneficiary can’t collected ademed gift.
-Exceptions: replacement property (e.g. testator replaces gifted item w/ similar item, beneficiary may get new item); balance of purchase price (after testator sells intended gift); condemnation or insurance proceeds; proceeds from sale by guardian.

Ademption by satisfaction: beneficiary receives gifted property before testator’s death. Most states require a writing + express intent to “down pay” the gift at the time of the inter vivos gift.

Beneficiary receives increased number of shares from stock splits or stock dividends. But wouldn’t get new securities/shares.

Debt owed on a gift (lien on a car, mortgage on a house)? Some states - liens exonerated (paid off with estate funds); UPC and other states - no exoneration unless will provides for it.

Abatement: when there isn’t enough money to pay everyone. Process of reducing gifts when estate property is inadequate to satisfy gifts and debts. Abatement order:
-Property passing by intestacy
-Residual gifts
-General gifts
-Demonstrative gifts
-Specific gifts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lapse

A

Gift fails because beneficiary fails to survive testator or is legally treated as not surviving testator.

How to distribute lapsed property:
-Will’s terms (e.g. “…if he survives me”)
-Anti-lapse statute may apply: prevent lapse by substituting descendants of predeceased beneficiary for predeceased beneficiary; relationship needed b/w testator and predeceased beneficiary varies by state.
-Residuary clause/lapse in residuary gift: (i) common law rule - deceased beneficiary’s share passes by intestacy; modern rule - surviving residuary beneficiaries divide the deceased beneficiary’s share.
-Intestacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Will interpretation and construction

A

These issues are raised by personal rep of the estate + heirs who would benefit from a different interpretation.

Basic rules of construction:
-Will –> intent not to die intestate.
-Conflicting provisions –> use one closer to testator’s death.
-Construe will as a whole.
-Give ordinary words their ordinary meaning.
-Give technical words their technical meaning.
-Give effect to all language in will.

Ambiguities:
-Patent ambiguity: ambiguity is obvious. Court looks at extrinsic evidence.
-Latent ambiguity: language is clear on its face but cannot be carried out with further clarification. E.g. “I leave my house to my cousin Frank” but it turns out the decedent has two cousins named Frank. Court looks at extrinsic evidence.
-No apparent ambiguity: language is clear on its face and can be carried out, but someone thinks testator made a mistake. Traditional/plain meaning rule - cannot disturb plain meaning of will. Modern rule - extrinsic evidence permitted to alter plain meaning of the will.

Incorporation by reference [of an external doc]. Requirements:
-Intent to incorporate writing
-Writing must be in existence when will is executed
-Writing must be clearly identified in will
-No witnesses to that external doc required

Tangible personal property doc: testator’s will may refer to written list to dispose of tangible personal property, even if list was not in existence at time of will execution.

Fact of independence significance: something that has a legal reason for existing other than the disposition of property at death. E.g. “I leave the contents of my safe deposit box” - testator can change contents of the box after execution of the will, so heir will receive the contents at the time of death.

Conditional will: will that is to operate if certain events occurs or does not occur. Courts construe will as general, not conditional, if possible.

Codicil: amendment to existing will. It acts to republish the will except as to the parts that are inconsistent. Will and codicil treated as one document speaking from date of codicil.
-Proof of codicil = proof of will. Codicil can incorporate defective will by reference.

Pour-over provision: provision in will that leaves property to inter vivos trust.
-Trust can be created before or after testator executes will.
-Trust doesn’t have to be previously funded.

Integration: must be able to show that all pages present at time of will execution are the same as pages present at time of probate. E.g. pagination, stick pages together.

Combination wills:
-Joint will: single testamentary document containing the wills of 2 or more persons. Bad practice.
-Reciprocal wills: separate wills with parallel dispositive provisions.
-Contractual will: will executed pursuant to a contract. At common law, extrinsic evidence can establish contractual nature of will. Under modern law, writing required (actual contract). Can be revoked by agreement of parties while both alive. Revoked by one person while both alive –> other person can change will. Revoked by one person after other dies –> injured beneficiaries may sue to impose constructive trust on property they should have received.

Power of appointment: owner of property (donor) transfers to the donee the power to appoint the new owner of the property.
-General power of appt: power exercisable in favor of donee, their estate, their creditors, or creditors of estate.
-Special power of appointment: power exercisable in favor of limited class of appointees, not including donee, their estate, their creditors, or creditors of estate.

Presently exercisable power: exercisable by donee during lifetime.
Testamentary power: exercisable only by donee’s will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Will revocation (three categories)

A

(1) Revocation by operation of law:
-Marriage - in most states, marriage has no effect on prior will. But in some states and UPC: spouse receives intestate share unless will provides for spouse, omission was intentional, OR testator executed will in contemplation of marriage.
-Divorce: all provisions in favor of ex-spouse are void. In some states, also void gifts to ex-relatives (e.g. step-child). Voiding occurs upon final divorce. Property that would have gone to ex-spouse passes under terms of will as if ex-spouse had died first.
-Beneficiary murders testator: won’t be able to take.

(2) Revocation by physical act [reqs]:
-Intent
-Mental capacity
-Physical act: burning; tearing; writing “void” across will; cutting it. Proxy revocation permitted if done at testator’s request AND in testator’s presence (can’t just give command to attorney over the phone).

Partial revocation by physical act: e.g. crossing out a line in the will and then writing in a change. Whether valid varies by state. But must re-execute will or have a codicil.

(3) Revocation by subsequent will or codicil:
-Will or codicil must meet formal requirements.
-Revocation can be express.
-if new will completely disposes of testator’s property –> old will completely revoked.
-If new will partially disposes of testator’s property –> old will revoked only as to inconsistent parts.
-Presumption of non-revocation if will is found in normal location and there are no suspicious circumstances.
-If will was in testator’s possession or control but can’t be produced after testator’s death –> presumption that testator revoked will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Revival

A

Testator executes valid Will 1. Then executes valid Will 2. Valid will 2 replaces will 1. Then testator validly revokes will 2. Is will 1 effective/does it revive? Three approaches:
-(1) UPC/intent approach –> look at testator’s intent.
-(2) Automatic revival approach –> revoking will never took effect because it was revoked.
-(3) No revival approach –> revocation by subsequent writing takes effect immediately when signed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conditional revocation

A

Implied conditional revocation (dependent relative revocation):
-Testator executes Will 1
-Testator validly revokes Will 1
-Testator executes Will 2, but Will 2 is invalid

Does Will 1 remain? DRR: Will 1’s revocation was impliedly conditioned on validity of Will 2. If Will 2 is invalid, Will 1 remains.

The more similar the will provisions, the more likely court will apply DRR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Protections of surviving spouse

A

Spouse’s elective share: surviving spouse has right to portion of estate regardless of what will says (b/c we don’t want them to get screwed over if e.g. if decedent was breadwinner).
-Amount may be percentage or vary with number of children or length of marriage.
-Some states give spouse share of augmented estate, which includes nonprobate assets.

Community property states:
-No elective share because spouse is protected by owning half of community property in the first place.
-Deceased spouse can give away only separate property and their half of community property.

Pretermitted child statutes:
-Purpose is to carry out testator’s presumed intent to provide for children.
-Typically applies to children born or adopted after will execution.
-Situations when pretermitted child does not receive forced share: entire estate left to pretermitted child’s other parent; omission was intentional; testator provided for pretermitted child (e.g. beneficiary of line insurance policy, so intentionally excluded out of will).

Other protections for minor children and surviving spouse:
-Homestead (family residence): e.g. may be protected from creditors; surviving spouse and minor children may have right to live there even though they don’t have a title interest.
-Family allowance: amount surviving spouse and minor children are supposed to receive after spouse dies.
-Exempt personal property: e.g. furniture; pets; books.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Will contests

A

Grounds for will contest:
-Does not meet reqs of valid will (defective execution)
-Lack of legal capacity
-Lack of testamentary capacity
-Lack of testamentary intent

Other ways of setting aside a will:

-Insane delusion: persistent belief in facts that against all evidence; must have a connection b/w insane delusion and property disposition to be grounds for will contest (i.e. your insanity actually has to drive a change/decision touching on the will).

-Undue influence: must prove that (i) influence existed and was exerted, (ii) influence overpowered testator’s mind and free will, and (iii) influence caused testator execute will with different terms. Evidence of undue influence: unnatural disposition; opportunity to exert undue influence; confidential or fiduciary relationship; ability of testator to resist; beneficiary’s involvement in drafting will.
-Presumption of undue influence: e.g. if attorney drafts the will and is also a beneficiary (unless close relatives).

-Duress: a more violent version of undue influence.

-Fraud: (i) false representation made to testator; (ii) knowledge of falsity by person making statement; (iii) testator reasonably believed statement; (iv) statement caused testator to execute will testator otherwise would not have executed.
-Fraud in the execution/factum: testator deceived as to identity or contents of instrument (e.g. blind person fraudulently induced to sign a will).
-Fraud in the inducement: testator knows identity and contents of will but is deceived as to extrinsic fact and makes gift based on that fact. E.g. son convinced father that his sister was a druggie and should be cut out of the will and father acts on that fraudulent suggestion.

-Mistake:
-Mistake in the execution/factum: testator is in error regarding contents or identity of instrument.
-Mistake in the inducement: testator mistaken as to some extrinsic fact and makes will based on that fact; courts generally will NOT grant relief.

17
Q

No-contest clause

A

Beneficiary forfeits interest in estate if they contest the will and lose.
-Most states enforce clause UNLESS contest was in good faith and with probable cause.
-Some states give clause full effect even if contest was in good faith.

18
Q

Probate and estate administration

A

Jurisdiction: person’s domicile at time of death. But if they owned land in another state, might also have to have proceedings in that other state b/c land is governed by the law of sutis.

Personal rep: person appointed to carry out estate administration.
-Called administrator if person died intestate.
-Called executor if named in will –> first thing you check. Person must be willing to serve and not be DQ’d for some reason, the court will appoint the person named in the will. If no one is willing to serve, there’s a statutory order just like for intestacy (spouse, child, etc.).

Duties of personal rep:
-Give notice to heirs and beneficiaries
-Give notice to creditors
-Collect and manage all probate assets
-Pay estate expanses and creditors
-Distribute property to heirs or beneficiaries

Priority of creditors’ claims:
-Administration expenses
-Up to a specified amount, funeral expenses and expenses of last illness
-Family allowance
-Federal claims
-Secured claims (e.g. mortgages on land)
-Unsecured claims

Two types of advance directives (usually for situations where you know you won’t be healthy enough to manage your own situation):
-(1) Medical power of attorney/durable healthcare power: principal names agent to make medical decisions when principal cannot.
-(2) Living will: directive to physicians, states individual’s desires regarding life-sustaining procedures.

Statutory surrogate statutes (in some states): allows certain people to make decisions for an incompetent person who needs medical decisions (e.g. spouse, parents) in case you didn’t arrange a living will.

19
Q

Trust (basics)

A

Title to property in a trust is divided into its legal part and its equitable part.

Settlor/trustor/grantor/donor: person who creates the trust and splits the property. The legal title goes to the trustee and the equitable title goes to the beneficiary.
Trustee: has responsibilities of ownership; owes fiduciary duties to beneficiaries (doesn’t actually get direct benefit from the property). Held to account for management of the trust.
-Must fellow the settlor’s instructions (set out in the trust instrument) + legal duties the state law imposes. The former often trump the state law rules.
Beneficiary: property isn’t like an outright gift; only get benefits as set forth in the trust (“maybe you only get the money when you’re 60 years old”). Enforces fiduciary duties.
-At the end of the trust, beneficiary receives both legal and equitable title.

Trust is a property conveyance - may be called principal, corpus, trust estate, or res.

Reasons people create trusts:
-Protect and provide for beneficiaries (so they don’t waste the money)
-Flexibility of asset distribution / spreading benefits over time and with specific conditions
-Protection against settlor’s incompetence
-Professional management of property
-Probate avoidance - i.e. trust not part of probate and are off the public record.
-Significant tax benefits.

Express trust: trust created through express intent of settlor.
-Private –> private beneficiaries.
-Charitable –> charitable beneficiaries.

Trusts created by operation of law:
-Resulting trust: attempt to carry out settlor’s intent.
-Constructive trust [not really a trust at all]: equitable remedy to prevent unjust enrichment.

20
Q

Trust validity

A

Elements of trust validity:

(1) Intent
-Present intent to split legal and equitable title + intent to impose enforceable duties on holder of legal title.
-Settlor must have capacity, i.e. if you can make an inter vivos outright gift, you can make an inter vivos trust.
-Beneficiary doesn’t need to be told about their status as beneficiary. But notification does bolster intent element.
-No formal words required.
-Promise to create trust in future is unenforceable unless there is a binding contract.
-Precatory language (expression of hope, wish, or suggestion) generally unlikely to create a trust b/c doesn’t impose a legal obligation, only a moral one.

(2) Identifiable corpus
-Any split of title into legal and equitable portions is permissible if the same person doesn’t own all the legal and equitable title. Sole trustee and sole beneficiary are the same person –> equitable and legal titles merge –> trust terminates.
-Trust property: any property the settlor can transfer can be held in trust; property the settlor can’t transfer or doesn’t yet own can’t be trust property (e.g. expectancy to be an heir; future income). Trust property must be separated from other property, but it can be a portion of specific property.

(3) Ascertainable beneficiaries
-Qualified beneficiary: beneficiary who is current or first line remainder beneficiary.
-Must only be a person who can take title (don’t need to be an adult or competent).
-Beneficiary may disclaim (reject) interest if they haven’t accepted any benefits. But once you’ve accepted any part of benefits, too late to disclaim.
-If beneficiary has died first, trust will by default fail. But a few states have anti-lapse statutes applied to interests in trusts so that if reqs are met, trust interest will go to predeceased beneficiary’s descendants (who become the beneficiaries).
-Divorce (finalized) revokes all trust provisions in favor of ex-spouse.
-Class gifts: beneficiaries may be unascertainable when trust created but must be ascertainable when property is to be distributed. E.g. “for my friends” is invalid (and property reverts to settlor). Settlor may allow trustee or third party to select which class members receive benefits.

(4) Proper purpose
-Trust may be created for any purpose that is not illegal or against public policy.
-Many states have abolished the RAP or adopted a longer time period (>21 yrs).
-Trust will not fail for lack of trustee b/c court can appoint one.
-Acceptance of trusteeship must sign trust instrument or written acceptance; if person starts acting like trustee, they will be deemed to have accepted.
-Trustee must have real duties. Trust instrument can indicate compensation. If instrument is silent, trustee usually entitled to reasonable comp.
-If trustee breaches trust, the court has power to remove trustee and appoint new one.

(5) Formalities and mechanics
-Creation of inter vivos trust (i.e. when settlor is still alive). (i) Declaration of trust - settlor and trustee are same person. Transfer or conveyance in trust - settlor transfers legal title to someone else. (ii) Testamentary trust is created by testator’s will (i.e. upon the testator’s death).
-Must fund the trust, i.e. actually deliver legally the property from the settlor to the trustee. Delivery: (i) declaration of trust: personal property –> property segregated and identified; real property –> deed land from settlor as individual to settlor as trustee. (ii) Conveyance in trust: real property –> deed land to trustee; personal property –> physically deliver property to trustee
-Pour-over gift from will to trust: will contains provisions leaving property to inter vivos trust; property governed by terms of trust –> trust amendments govern poured-over property. Poured-over property can be initial trust funding if trust identified in will and trust executed before testator’s death.
-Testamentary secret trust: testamentary gift in will that is silent about the trust nature of the transfer. Settlor agrees with will beneficiary that B will hold property in trust for someone else. Courts allow trust beneficiary to present extrinsic evidence and seek constructive trust remedy.
–Testamentary semi-secret trust: the will clearly says “in trust” but it fails to state beneficiaries are how the property is to be used, etc. Court will not create a trust for failure to ascertain beneficiaries, so gift fails. Trustee must give legal title back to settlor’s successors in interests (resulting trust).

21
Q

Transfer of beneficiary’s interests

A

General rule: the interests are freely transferrable; beneficiary can make voluntary transfers (like gifts or sales); creditors can involuntarily get the property.
-But in practice, this is rare because we have spendthrift provisions restricting such rights.

Discretionary trust:
-Trustee determines how much beneficiary receives on settlor’s behalf. Beneficiary has nothing to transfer until trustee decides to distribute money, so there is nothing for creditors to reach. Exception for claims for child or spousal support.

Spendthrift provision (almost every trust has this):
-Beneficiary can’t transfer interest (but once the beneficiary gets paid they can of course do whatever they want)
-Creditors can’t attach beneficiary’s interest

Limitations on spendthrift:
-Ineffective if settlor is the beneficiary (can’t protect your own money from your creditors). But minority of states allow self-settled spendthrift trusts.
-Ineffective against certain claims such as child or spousal support.

Support trusts:
-Use of trust property limited to beneficiary’s support.
-May be mandatory or discretionary.
-Impliedly spendthrift.
-Standard of support if the instrument doesn’t explain it = lifestyle to which beneficiary was already accustomed.
-Do we look at the beneficiaries other sources of income/funds in calculating? Best if this is all sketched out in the trust instrument.

22
Q

Modification and termination of trusts

A

Most common way that a trust ends is by its express terms.

Settlor may modify or revoke trust for any reason unless trust instrument expressly states it’s irrevocable.

Modification by beneficiaries permitted if settlor consents. Beneficiaries may modify without settlor’s consent if:
-All beneficiaries agree
-Changes would not upset material trust purpose (e.g. provisions that pay at a certain age/date).

Court may modify or terminate trust if:
-Trust’s purposes accomplished, illegal, or impossible.
-Unanticipated circumstances, i.e. things the settlor never anticipated upon creating the trust.
-Value of trust too low
-Some states: fix mistake if shown by clear and convincing evidence.

Trustee may modify if:
-Terminate uneconomic trust
-Combine or divide trust

Trustee retains trustee’s powers for a reasonable period of time even after trust ends. Last duty is to distribute the rest of the property to the remainder beneficiaries in a timely fashion.

23
Q

Trustee powers

A

-Express powers granted by settlor in trust instrument.
-Powers provided by state statute –> automatically has all those powers. The instrument may add or subtract from them.
-Powers granted by court.
-Implied powers necessary or appropriate to carry out terms of trust.
-Trustees can exercise power by majority decision.

Powers (examples):
-Sell trust property (to be able to invest)
-Invest
-Incur reasonable expenses
-Hire agents
-Mortgage trust property
-Repair trust property

Mandatory power –> trustee must exercise it. E.g.
pay beneficiary $1k every month; invest in a particular company’s stock.
Discretionary power –> trustee may exercise power as trustee sees fit. Trustee liable only for abuse of discretion or failure to exercise discretion. No such thing as absolute discretion b/c we need enforceable duties for bad faith etc.

24
Q

Trustee duties

A

Duties:
-Trustee has duty to administer trust according to its terms.
-Duty of loyalty to beneficiaries –> must avoid self-dealing, so trustees cannot personally benefit from trust, purchase property from trust, sell own property to trust, borrow from trust, claim excessive comp.
-Trustee’s good faith or fairness irrelevant.
-Keep accurate records and render accountings (usually upon request of beneficiary or court).
-Earmark trust property (label trust property as belonging to the trust so it doesn’t get confused with the trustee’s own property etc.)
-Keep trust property separate (no commingling).
-Prudent investor rule: trustee must invest in same manner as prudent investor, unless instrument has changed that default standard (but must explicit). The key thing is portfolio approach - view investments togethers in context of entire trust portfolio and part of overall investment strategy.
-Trustee with higher skills has duty to use those skills. But trustee with lower skills must still comply with prudent investor rule.
-Trustee must diversify investments unless trust purposes are better served w/o diversification.
-Trustee has duty to review trust property, investment tracking, etc.
-Loyalty and impartiality: trustee must administer trust exclusively for beneficiary’s interest; trustee must act impartially and not favor one beneficiary over another.

Factors considered in making investment decisions:
-Trust purposes
-Economic conditions
-Tax consequences
-Role of each investment in portfolio
-Income and appreciation
-Other resources of beneficiaries
-Need for liquidity, regularity of income

25
Q

Delegation of trustee duties

A

Trustee may delegate investment and management function.

Trustee protected from liability if acted prudently in:
-Selecting agent
-Establishing scope and terms of delegation
-Periodically reviewing agent’s actions

26
Q

Liability of the trustee

A

Damages recoverable for breach:
-Lost profits that trust would have earned but for the breach
-Depreciation in value of trust property
-Trustee’s profits from breach

Trustee is not liable for breach when:
-Reasonably relied on terms of trust
-Beneficiaries consented or ratified transaction
-Settlor or instrument allowed conduct
-Exculpatory clause relieves trustee from liability for breaches. Generally, exculpate only negligent conduct (not bad faith, etc.).

Co-trustee liability: trustee will not be liable for acts of co-trustees if trustee did not join in the action and exercised reasonable care in preventing the breach or compelling the co-trustees to redress it.

Grounds for removing trustee from office:
-Incompetence
-Unfitness
-Serious breach of duty or conflict of interest
-Insolvency
-Extreme hostility b/w trustee and beneficiaries
-Refusal to post bond
-Refusal to account

27
Q

Remedies for trustee’s self-dealing

A

-Affirm transaction if trust profited.
-Set aside transaction if trust lost money.
-Trace (get back) profits from trustee.

28
Q

Trustee’s liability to 3rd parties

A

Contracts: trustee personally liable but can avoid liability by contract provision or indicating role as trustee by signature. In most states if you write in “…as a trustee,” presumption that no personal liability.
-Trustee entitled to indemnification or reimbursement from trust.

Torts: trustee liable if personally at fault. In most states, trustee not liable for acts of agents or employees using respondeat superior.

Liability of third parties: if the trust property is inappropriately in the hands of a non-BFP, court can aside the transaction and get that property back for the trust.

29
Q

Allocation of receipts and expenses

A

Uniform Principal and Income Act:
-Describes how principal and trust income should be allocated
-Settlor can alter rules
-Trustee has adjustment power - trustee must consider many factors. Adjustment can’t be made if: prohibited by trust instrument; trustee is also beneficiary; it would cause adverse tax consequences.

Basic rules of UPIA:

Allocation of receipts:
-Money from selling asset (including capital gain) –> Principal
-Rent –> Income
-Interest on trust investments –> Income
-Eminent domain awards –> Principal
-Insurance proceeds if principal is destroyed –> Principal
-Cash stock dividend –> Income
-Stock dividend, stock split, or shares received because of reorg –> Principal
-Wasting assets (gas, oil, IP) –> 10% income, 90% principal
-Sale of unproductive property –> Principal

Allocation of expenses:
-Ordinary income tax –> comes out of Income
-Capital gains tax –> Principal
-Ordinary repairs –> Income
-Extraordinary repairs and capital improvements –> Principal
-Depreciation –> Income
-Trustee compensation and accounting expenses –> 50/50

30
Q

Charitable trust

A

Designed to help society in general. Charitable purposes (determined by court –> standard: what is generally accepted in the community as “charitable”):
-Relief of poverty
-Advancement of education, science, or art
-Advancement of religion (more generous standard - whether it’s against the law or public policy)
-Promotion of health
-Gov’t purposes such as parks and museums

Settlor must be sufficiently altruistic in supplying benefits.

Cy Pres Doctrine: if charitable purpose cannot be carried out as written, court may select alternate by ascertaining settlor’s primary purpose (need to have had a general charitable intent); basically approximating the original aim.

RAP doesn’t apply to charitable trusts.

Enforcers of charitable trusts:
-If charitable org is named, they may come in and have standing against a breaching trustee
-States attorney general

31
Q

Honorary or purpose trust

A

No human beneficiaries and not for charitable purpose. E.g. a trust set up to care for pet animals; trust to maintain a monument.

32
Q

Resulting trust

A

Arises by implication from settlor’s conduct (actions speak louder than the missing word).

Beneficiaries: settlor or settlor’s successors in interest if settlor has died.

Purpose is to do what settlor would have done.

Common scenarios that give rise to a resulting trust:
-Failure to express trust (e.g. ineffective formation, like unascertainable beneficiaries).
-Excess trust corpus and no provision for remainder.
-Purchase money resulting trust: supplier of purchase money gives money to seller who gives title to property to third party. Why 3rd party has title instead of purchaser: (i) gift (law presumes gift when parties are closely related); (ii) loan; (iii) purchase money resulting trust (you intended the recipient to hold the money for you).

33
Q

Constructive trust

A

NOT a trust but an equitable remedy to prevent unjust enrichment, where equity turns the holder of legal title into a trustee when the person cannot in good conscience cannot retain the beneficial interest in the property.
-Must be requested as remedy in court action.
-Must show particular property was involved in improper conduct.
-Constructive trustee’s only duty is to give legal title back to person who would have owned it but for wrongful conduct.

Grounds to impose a constructive trust:
-Fraud, duress, mistake, or breach of fiduciary duty. E.g. dying person tries to alter her will so that her friend receives her property instead of her family members –> family members physically restrain her to prevent her from cutting them out –> she permanently lapses into coma as a result of the exertion –> constructive trust results and property goes to the intended recipient (testator’s friend).
-Homicide (in states that lack slayer statute).
-Abuse of confidential relationship
-Breach of promise

34
Q
A