Wills MBE Flashcards
Lost wills
Jursidictions split on whether this constitutes rebuttable presumption that decedent destroyed the will.
Duplicate original permitted; photography not permitted
Burden on proponent- clear and convincing
Revocation of codicils
revives the original will
3 ways to revoke will
- physical action
- operation of law (divorce)
- subsequent instrument
A testator can revoke a will or codicil by executing a later valid will or codicil that partly or completely revokes the prior will or codicil. Oral revocations are not valid
3rd party can revoke will for T
- Done at T’s direction
2. In T’s conscious presence
Revival of 1st will after revocation of 2nd will?
Common Law: automatic revival of original will upon revocation of 2nd will
UPC: get it from outline
Dependent Relative Revocation
T’s revocation of will is disregarded if it was based on a mistake of law or fact and would not have been done but for that mistake
Incorporation by reference
Another writing not executed with testamentary formalities may dictate the distribution of T’s property
Incorporation by reference test:
If property:
1) existed at the time of execution of the will
2) Is intended to be incorporated and
3) Is described in the will with sufficient certainty to permit identification
UPC waives element 1 if document is disposing of tangible personal property
Construction (Interpretation of Will)
Courts tend to give the words in wills their plain meaning.
o We assume the testator meant the plain meaning of what he said, even if the testator
meant something else.
o Exception: The will states otherwise (e.g., by defining terms)
Courts reluctant to disturb plain meaning of will
Extrinsic evidence allowed to resolve ambiguities
Patent ambiguity (mistake/ambiguity on its face)
Latent ambiguity (mistake/ambiguity not apparent from reading the will)
Lapse - Common law
A testamentary gift would lapse (i.e., fail) if an
intended beneficiary did not survive the testator.
Failed gifts would be dumped into the residuary gift.
Abatement
If the estate does not have sufficient funds to pay debts or make gifts, the gifts will be
abated, or reduced, in a specific order
- intestate property
- residuary
- general
- specific
Ademption
A will makes a specific devise of property, but the specific piece of property is no longer in the estate at the testator’s death.
Common Law: devise is extinct and the devisee
takes nothing.
Ademption UPC approach
UPC: Look to the testator’s intent at time she disposed of the property.
Look for facts that suggest the testator intended the ademption.
If Ademption inconsistent with testator’s intent then beneficiary entitled to money or equivalent in value of the specific property promised
Ademption by satisfaction
gift may be satisfied by inter vivos transfer of property after the execution of the will if that’s T’s intent
UPC- must be expressly in writing
Omitted Spouse
Rebuttable presumption that omission was a mistake; the omitted spouse is entitled to the intestate share unless…
a. UPC- valid prenup can rebut the presumption
b. The spouse was given property outside of the will in lieu of a disposition in the will;
c. intentional omission
Traditional- presumption rebutted if T’s intent to omit spouse is apparent from language of will
Advancement of inheritance
Common Law- lifetime gift presumed to be advancement of child’s intestate share; child has burden to prove otherwise
Modern trend (UPC)- gift is an advancement if D declared in a contemporaneous writing that the gift was an advancement or 2) heir acknowledges that the gift was an advancement IN WRITING
Disclaimer
A person may disclaim a testamentary gift
- Procedure: be in writing, signed and filed w/ the court
- Timing: within 9 months of decedent’s death
Who has standing to contest a will
Only directly interested parties who stand to benefit financially from the will or intestate succession (e.g. A spouse of an heir/beneficiary can’t contest nor can T’s general creditors.)
Timing: must file contest claim within 6 months after will admitted to probate
Will Contests:
Lack of Testamentary Capacity
Generally T must be:
18 or over & of sound mind
Person challenging the will (“the contestant”) bears the burden of proving that the
testator lacked the ability to know:
- The nature of the act (why?)
- The Nature and Character of her property (what am I giving?)
- The natural objects of his bounty (Who?)
- The plan of attempted disposition (how do I want this divided?)
Note: lacked the ability to know not whether T actually knew
Will Contests:
Insane Delusion
Testator has general capacity, but has an insane delusion as to some belief (e.g. leaving wife out of will b/c husband irrationally believes she’s cheating)
Will Contests:
Insane Delusion Test
Rational person test:
A belief is an insane delusion if the rational person could not have reached the same
conclusion
But for:
The contestant must show that the person would have received the property but for the insane delusion