Wills: Interpretation, Alteration and Revocation Flashcards
1) What two presumptions are used by the courts to establish the testators intentions through the language of the will itself?
2) Are these presumptions rebuttable?
1) Non-technical Words bear their ordinary meaning; and
Technical words are given their technical meaning.
2) Yes - the presumptions are rebuttable if from the will (or any admissible extrinsic evidence) it is clear T was using the word in a different sense.
Define the presumption the courts use that non-technical words will bear their ordinary meaning.
Some words have several different meanings, with the court having to try and interested the meaning testator intended in the context of the will as a whole (eg money could mean physical money, or simply everything the person owns).
Define the presumption that technical words are given their technical meaning.
Re Cook example - T made gift go ‘all my personal estate. Court determined the word personal had the technical meaning of personalty as opposed to realty.
Explain the courts general approach to establishing intention of a T.
The courts will focus on the ordinary meaning of the words used, but will also take account of context and common sense.
As set out by s21 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982, explain the two part test as to how courts can use the admission of extrinsic evidence to aid the interception of a will.
1) The section applies to a will:
a) in so far as any part of it is meaningless;
b) in so far as the language used in any part of it is ambiguous on its face;
c) in so far as evidence, other than evidence of T’s intention, shows that the language used in any part of it is ambiguous in the light of surrounding circumstances.
2) If one of the above applies, the court can use the intrinsic evidence, including evidence of T’s intention, to assist its interpretation.
Summarise s21 of AJA, and how it allows the admission of extrinsic evidence to aid the interpretation of a will.
Section 21 permits extrinsic evidence (inducing evidence of declarations made by T) to be admitted to interpret the will so far as any part of the will is rendered meaningless/ language used is ambiguous or evidence shows language is ambiguous in light of surrounding circumstances.
Explain the requirements which need to be met for a court to rectify a will.
Arises where T’s intentions are clear but the wording of the will does not affect the intention.
S20 AJA:
If a court is satisfied that a will is so expressed that it fails to carry out T’s intentions, in consequence of:
a) a clear clerical error; or
b) of a failure to understand his instructions
it may order that the will is rectified to carry out T’s intentions.
Define clerical error (rectification of wills)
Clerical error refers to something in the will which has been written/ omitted by mistake.
What is the basic rule (s24 AJA) regarding the interpretation of the subject matter of gifts (property) passing in the will?
The will is interpreted as if it had been executed immediately prior to T’s death.
Eg a gift of all my estate, or my remaining estate, will refer to the property owned by the testator at the time they died, not at the time the will was made.
How can a contrary intention be shown in a will (regarding the disposition of property)?
Words referring to the present (provided the wording is essential to the description of the asset). Eg ‘the house I NOW own’.
Describe the general rule in relation to beneficiaries named in a will.
References to beneficiaries are construed as to people alive at the time of the will’s execution (ie the will speaks from the date of execution).
Eg gift to Kate’s eldest daughter has effect of the person fluffing that description at the time.
Describe the general rule relating to named family beneficiaries (eg my children).
This is taken to mean blood relatives (eg biological children not step children/ children of a spouse). This presumption will be rebutted if the will provides as such.
True or False: Adopted children are usually deemed children of the adoptive parents for the purposes of beneficiaries in wills?
True
Explain the gender recognition act rule regarding beneficiaries of wills.
Beneficiary who obtains full gender recognition certificate (transgender) is legally recognised as their new gender. this does not apply to property left to them in a will made before 4 April 2005 but do after.
(eg beneficiary who is now recognised as a woman will be deemed as a daughter under the will if it was made and executed after 4th April 2005 but not if it was made beforehand).
Are words civil partner/ husband or wife interchangeable?
No. A gift to ‘my wife’ will fail if they in fact form a civil partnership.