Wills-Execution-DWB Flashcards

1
Q

Attested Will

Generally

A

A valid Attested Will must be:

  • in writing,
  • signed, and
  • witnessed.

Specific requirements vary by jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Holographic Will

A

A Holographic Will is an unwitnissed will.

Only about half of states adknowledge.

CA & UPC: Signature & material provisions must be in T’s handwriting, intent may be part of form or hand written

Some Jurisdictions also require statement of intent or whole document to be in T’s handwriting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Codicil

A

A Codicil is a will which amends a previous will without revoking it entirely.

Execution of a codicil reexecutes, republishes, and re-dates the underlying will, which can cure defects in the underlying will, e.g. interested witness, undue influence.

If underlying will is not valid, the codicil becomes a freestanding will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Devices which increase the scope of a will

A
  • Integration
  • Republication by codicil
  • Incorporation by reference
  • Facts of independent significance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Integration

A

Verbatim: Under the doctrine of integration, those pieces of paper which are physically present at the time of execution and that the testator intends to be part of the will constitute the pages of the will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Republication by Codicil

A

Execution of a codicil has the effect of re-executing, republishing and re-dating the underlying will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Incorporation by Reference

A

A document not executed with Wills Act formalities may be given effect along with a will if: the document was in existence at the time the will was executed, the will expresses an intent to incorporate the document, and the will adequately identifies the document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Facts of Independent Significance

A

A will may refer to a fact or event that is to occur outside of the will, the fact or event may contol either who takes under the will or how much a beneficiary takes.

The fact or event must have significance independent of its effect upon the will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Will Revocation

A

A will may be revoked by:

  • subsequent will: valid attested or holographic
  • act: destructive toward will, with intent to revoke, including non-will writing on will by testator
  • presumption: if will cannot be found, revocation by act presumed
  • operation of law: marriage, divorce, etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Revocation of

Subsequent Will

A

T executes W2, revoking W1. T thereafter revokes W2.

Traditional Approach: W2 revoked W1. W1 must be re-executed.

CA & Modern Majority: W2 revoked by W3: W1 revoked except as provided in W3.

CA & Modern Majority: W2 revoked by Act: W1 revoked except as evidenced by circumstances and declarations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Attested Will

California

A
  • In California, a will must be in writing,
  • signed by the testator, or another in T’s name, at T’s direction, in T’s presence, or by a conservator with a court order
  • signed, during T’s lifetime, by two witnesses who,
  • together at the same time,
  • witnessed T’ sign the will or acknowledge the signature or will, and
  • undestand that they are signing T’s will.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Judicial Approaches to will Requirements

A

Absolute Strict Compliance**: must comply exactly. **CL and Majority

Substantial Compliance: Court may probate will if there is clear and convincing evidence that: 1) the testator intended the document to constitute their will, and 2) the Wills Act requirements were substantially met.

Harmless Error: Only need C&CE of testator intent. i.e. first half of Substantial Compliance. UPC, CA (for witness req.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Witnissed”

Interpretations

A

Line of sight

Traditionally a witness must see or have the opportunity of seeing the tesator sign and the testator must see or have the opportunity of seeing the witness sign the will.

Conscious Presence Test

Modernly, it is commonly acceptable for the witness to be able to tell from sight sound and general awareness that the required act is being performed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Delayed Attestation

A

California: Witnesses must sign during T’s lifetime

UPC: Witnessess must sign within a reasonable time of witnessing execution, even after T’s death

Traditional: Witnisses must sign at the execution, in presence of T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Attestation Clause

A

Attestation Clauses, or self-proving affidavits, create a rebuttabe presumption that the will was properly executed.

This is done to facilitate the probate process by eliminating the need to call witnesses court prior to probate.

Attestation Clauses are common but not required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Interested Witness

A

An interested witness is a witness who has a financial interest in a will.

  • CL: Invalidate Will
  • Minority: Void interested party gift
  • CA, Majority: Void interested party gift in excess of intestate share
  • UPC: No separate remedy, claim undue influence or fraud
17
Q

Swapped Wills

A

Husband and Wife sign each other’s wills instead of their own.

  • Traditional CL: Will invalid
  • California, Modern Trend: Will valid if Testator intended the will to constitute their will.
18
Q

Conditional Wills

A

Conditional wills are wills which are only given effect if certain conditions are met.

Valid, but provisions are narrowly construed as much as possible as explanations rather than conditions.

Contrast with Facts of independent significance, which affect provisions within a will.

19
Q

Nuncupative Will

Oral Will

A

Nuncupative wills are made under peril of death.

Oral wills are not written.

Example: common scenario is soldier in battle telling friends what to do with his stuff as he lay dying.

Not generally recognized. Even where recognized, not very viable due to numerous requirements.

20
Q

Revocation by

Subsequent Will

A

Verbatim: A will or any part thereof is revoked by a subsequent will which revokes the prior will or part expressly or by inconsistency.

21
Q

Revocation by

Act

A

CA Rule: “A will or any part theref is revoked by being burned, torn, canceled, obliterated, or destroyed, with the intent and for the purpose of revoking it, by either the testator or another person in the testator’s presence and by the testtor’s direction.”

Note: Lines or VOID count. Destroying one duplicate revokes all duplicates.

Variations: Testator must perform act, no partial revocation, lines/markings don’t count.

22
Q

Revocation by Presumption

A

CA Rule: If the testator’s will was last in the testator’s possession, the testator was competent until death, and neither the will nor a duplicate original of the will can be found after the testator’s dath, it is presumed that the testator destroyed the will with intent to revoke it.

Variations: Missing testator copy revokes all duplicates.

Factors affecting burden of proof: degree of decedent control, accessability to beneficiaries,

23
Q

DRR

Dependent Relative Revocation

A

Even if a will or part thereof is validly revoked, courts will ignore the revocation if: 1) the revocation was based on a mistake, AND, 2) testator would not have revoked if they had known the truth.

Generally, this is only used where: 1) there is a failed alternative testamentary scheme, OR 2) the mistake is set forth in the revoking document and is beyond the testator’s knowledge.

Common Example: T revokes W1 by act, believing W2 was validly executed.

24
Q

Revocation

by

Operation of Law

A

CA Rule: Divorce automatically revokes all provisions in a testator’s will in favor of the ex-spouse. Applies to domestic partnerships. Revived if remarried to same spouse.

UPC/Majority: revocation is irrevocable.

Variation: Spouse’s family also disinherited.

25
Q

Contracts

Concerning

Wills

A

A valid contract to make or not to revoke a will requires an offer, acceptance, and consideration.

Writing requirement determined by statute of frauds.

  • Remedy: Constructive trust
  • NOT specific performance
  • Executed will still probated

Note: UPC, CA, and Majority: joint or mutual wills DO NOT create a presumption of a contract not to revoke.

26
Q

Contracts

Concerning Wills

California

A
  • Provision in a will stating material provisions of contract
  • Express reference in a will
  • Writing signed by decedent
  • C&CE of an agreement between decedent and claimant or another person for benefit of claimant
    *
27
Q

Order of Takers

A

1) Creditors
2) Spousal Protection
3) Beneficiaries

28
Q

Contract not to Revoke

Remarriage

A

Majority: enforce terms of contract, allow beneficiaries to take before new spouse’s spousal protections.

Minority: does not enforce because enforcement discourages or restrains the right to marry.

29
Q

Valid Signature

A

Any completed marking intended by the testator to be their signature qualifies. Singatures stopped of testators own volition qualify, but interrupted signatures which are not later completed do not qualify

30
Q

Lost Will Doctrine

A

Under the lost will doctrine, where a will is lost but not presumed to have been revoked, extrinsic evidence is admissible to prove the provisions of the will.

31
Q

Partial Revocation by Act

A

Majority: Revoked gift passes to residuary clause.

Minority: Revoked gift passes through intestacy.