Wills and Trusts Flashcards
Wills - Intent
- Capacity
- at time of execution testator must
- be at least 18 years old
- be able to understand the extent her property
- know the natural objects of her bounty
- know the nature of her act (that she is executing a will
- without proper intent the entire wil is invalid and propery passes intestate, unless new will revoked old will. in that case, old will rules bc revocation was invalid
- at time of execution testator must
- insane delusion
- elements -
- Testator had a false belief
- that false beleif was a prdocut of sick mind
- there is no evidence to support the beleif
- delusion must have affecte T’s will
- consequence - only part of the will which was affected bny del¨sion is invalid. as to that part, it will go to the residuary devisee, or if none, or if the residue itself was delusions, then intestate succession
- elements -
- Fraud - misrepresentation of a material fact known to be false by wrongdoer for the prupose of inducing action and does it does induce that action/inaction
- fraud in the execution - someone forges T’s signature or T signs will thinking it is something else.
- will is then invalid
- Fraud in the inducement - the wrongdoers misrepresentation affects the contents of T’s will.
- consequence - only that part of the will that is affected by the fraud is invalid. as to that part, the court has three options
- givepropertytoresiduardevisees,or
- toheirsatlawbyintestate,or
- maketheheirsaconstructivetrustee
- consequence - only that part of the will that is affected by the fraud is invalid. as to that part, the court has three options
- Fraud in preventing testator from revoking
- court will not probate the iwll, thus the porperty goes to heirs. courr will also declar the heir a constructive trustee who has a duty to transfer the preprty to the intended beneficary.
- fraud in the execution - someone forges T’s signature or T signs will thinking it is something else.
- Undue Influence - established in three ways
- Prima Facie Case -
- T has weakness such that he is susceptible,
- the wrongdoerhas access to T,
- it is wrongful act that gets the gift,
- unnatual results.
- only part of will that is subject to undue influence is invalid
- Presumptin - a
- condificential relationship exists between t and the wrongdoer,
- the wrongful act gets the gift,
- an unnatural result
- consequences same as above
- statutory undue influence
- California genearlly invalidatesa donative transfer from T to:
- apersonwhodraftedtheinstrument
- apersonwhoisrelatedto,cohabitates,oremployerofdrafter
- apersonwhoisinafiduciaryrelationshipwiththeTandwhotransrbesthetestatmentaryinstrument
- These rules do not apply if
- TheTisrelatedtodrafter
- iftheinstrumentisreviewedbyanindependantattywhocunselsT
- consequence-deviseedoesnottakegift,butonlytotheextentthatthegiftexceedsthatpersopns’sintestateshare.restofgiftpassestoresidarydevisee
- California genearlly invalidatesa donative transfer from T to:
- Prima Facie Case -
Wills - Mistake
- Mistake in content - the wrong beneficiary is named
- if words are accidentyly left out, no relief is given
- if words are accdiently added, remedy may be given. court can reduce, not add words
- mistake in execution - T signs the wrong document
- If T sings the will believing it is a nontestamentary instrument, the will is not probated bc T did not intend document to be a will
- if H+W hav reciprocal wills and each mistakenly signs the wrong one, court may reform the will and substitute the correct names in the name of equity
- Mistake in inducement - a particular gift is made/nt made on basis of T’s erroneous belief
- no relief is given
- except, when both the mistake and what T would hav done but for the mistake appear on the face of the will
- need testator intent in will
- mistake in the description - no one or nothing fits the ddescription OR two or more persons or things fit the description
- coiurt will introduction of parol evidence for any ambiguity, latent or patent, to determine T’s intent
- Dependant Relative Revocation - allows the court to ignore the revocation of WIll #1 on the grounds that T revoked will #1 bc mistakenly belived Will #2 effectuated his intent
- RULE - if T revokes her will, in the mistaken belief that a substantially identical will or codicil effectuates her intent, then by operaton of law, the revocation of the first will be deemed conditional, dependant, and relative to the second effectuating T’s intent. if second does not effectuate T’s intent, then first was never revoked.
- Applies where will # 1 revoked by subsequent instrument or by physical act. atty who drafted will #1 can testify as to terms of the will)
- Mistake involving living children - accidenta omission of a child from a will
- Rule - a child is pretermitted if born or adopted after all testamentary instruments are executed and not provided for in any testamentary instrument
- a pretermitted child an intestate share of thee state(which includes asses in testator inter-vivos trust)
- if after the child is born, there is a subsequent repiblication of thew ill by codicil, the omitted child may not take bc codicil republished the will and in the alternative, the codicil itself is a testamentary instrument, thus the brth took place bf codicil was executed
- a child born or adopted before all testamentary instruments are executed and not provided for in any instrument is not pretermitted. child takes nothing
- exception if T erroneously believed that child was dead or non-existent at the time of will
- Rule - a child is pretermitted if born or adopted after all testamentary instruments are executed and not provided for in any testamentary instrument
Components of the Will
- Integration - refers to which papers make up the will. two elements required
- intent - T must have intended for papers in question to be part of the will
- presence - the paper must have been actually present at the time of execution
- incorporation by reference - allows a non-integrated writing tobecome part of the will, IF
- document must been in existence when will was executed
- document must be clearly identified in will
- T must ahve intended to incorporate the doc into will
- facts of independant significance - who a beneficiary is, what gift is given, may be given meaning by facts of significance independent from T’s will. Allows the court to fill in the blanks in T’s will with parol evidence that is trustworthy
- Pour-over wills - where part or all of T’s estate is devised to the trustee of an inter-vivos trust, that trust instrument may be admitted into probate and the pour over provision effectuated via
- incorporation by reference
- independant significance or
- uniform testamentary additions to trusts act - as long as you have a valid trust, which was executed before or concurrently w/ the exevution of T’s will, the pour-over provision is valid by statute.
Requirement for Execution of Attested Wills
Elements
- the will must be in writing
- the will must be signed by T, a person appointed by T if T is incapacitated, or a conservator appointed by the court.
- signing must be done in teh presense of 2 witnesses
- the witness must sign the will and understand that the instrument they sign is T’s will
- witnesses do not have to sign in teh presence of T
- T does not have to declar to witnesses “this is my will”
- there is no order of signing
- signing anywhere on teh will is ok
- split in Cal, re whetehr witness may sign after T dies. recently the Cal Supreme Court held that W must sign during T’s lifetime.
Interested Witnesses - those who are beneficiaries under the will
- not automatically invalid. but unless there are two other disinterested W’s, a presumption arises that the W/beneficiary suecred the gift by wrongdooing.
- If W/beneficiary rebuts the presumption of wrongdoing, she takes the gift.
- if W/beneficiary fails to rebut, then she takes an amount not to exceed intestacy
Conditional will - one whose validity is made conditional by its own terms.
- the will is to be probated only if condition is satisfied
Requirements for Execution of Holographic Wills
- Elements
- must be signed by the testator, anywhere on the will
- the material provision must be in the T’s own handwriting
- Extrinsic evidence is admissible to determine T’s testamentary intent
- a series of letters can constitute a will under integration
- a date is not requried but lack of a date can create problems
- if undated holograph will is inconsistent wih the provisions of another will, the undated holograph is invalid to the extent of inconsistency, unless the undated holograph’s date is established to be after the date of execution of the otehr will
- if two undated holographs, and unable to establish which is later, neither is valid to the extent of the inconsistency
- If a holograph is undated, and it is established that T lacked capacity at any time during which the will might have been executed, the holograph is invalid, unless it established that it was executed a time when T had capacity.
- if undated holograph will is inconsistent wih the provisions of another will, the undated holograph is invalid to the extent of inconsistency, unless the undated holograph’s date is established to be after the date of execution of the otehr will
Choice of Law
a will can be admited to probate in california if any of the following 3 rules is satisfied
- the will complies with california’s formalites of execution
- the will complies with the formalities of the place where the will was executed
- the will complies with the formalities of the place where T was domiciled at the time of execution
Codicils
- defined - a testamentary instrument executed in compliance with the cal probate code
- a codicil republishes the will, so that the will speaks from the date of the codicial execution
- revocation of codicils
- if T executes a will, then executes a codicil, and subsequently revokes the codicil. there is a rebuttable presumption that T intended to revoke only his codicil
- but if T excutes a will, then executes a codicil, and subsequently revokes the will, tehre is a rebuttable presumption that T intended to revoke the will AND codicil
Revocation by physical act
- Elements
- will must be burned, torn, cancelled, destroyed or oblitereated
- t must have the simltaneious intent to revoke (act and intent must coincide)
- the act must be done by T, or by someone in T’s presence and at his direction
- cancellations and interlineations generally cancels the changed provision if the material provision are not in T’s own handwriting. but a cancellation or interlining may be saved by DRR(as long as the new gift is greater than the cancelled gift, cant use DRR to save a interlineation that reduces a gfit or increases a co-beneficiaries gift
- duplicate wills - if T, or someone in T’s presence and at his direction revokes by physical act on the duplicate originals, then the other duplicate original is also revoked as a matter of law
- mutliated wills - if a will is gound in a mutilated condition at T’s death and when last seen it was in T’s possession, tehre is a rebuttable presement that T intended to revoke it
revocation by subsequent written instrument
- Can be express (statement in will #2 or implied (will #2 totally disposes of T’s estate)
- revival - not automatic, byut may occur if T manifests an intent to revive WIll #1 (oral statements where will #2 is revoked by physica act or terms o fthe codicil indacated the T wanted will #1 revivied where will #2 is revoked by subsequent instrument.
Revocation by Operation of Law
Omitted Child - a will exdcuted prior to the birth or adoption of a child which omits that child is revoked as to that child, unless
- T’s failure to provide for thec hild was intentional, and that intention appears from the testamentary instrument
- T evidenced a plan that child’s other parent would take financial car of all children that they have together
- T provided for the child outside the testamentary insturment with intent that the transfer is in lieu of any testamentary provision
Omitted Spouse - a will executed prior to marriage, and which omits the surviving spouse is revoked as to that spouse,
- unless
- failure to provide was intentional, and intent appears on the instrument
- T provided for the spouse by some other transfer
- omitted spouse signed a valid waiver of her right to share in T’s estate
- Omitted spouse receives a statutory share of assets decedent owned at death plus any assets held in any intervivos trust. statutory share includes:
- 1/2 of the community property and 1/2 of the quasi community property
- 1/3 to 1/2 of the separate property equal to that what she would have received if the decedent had died without a will, but never more than 1/2 of the separate property estate
Omitted domestic partner - same as omitted spouse
Final dissolution of marriage or domestic partnership - disposition of property to a former spouse in a will executed before divroce/annulment is revoked by dissolution unless the will provides otherwise
Revocation by change in property holdings
Ademption
- Where T has devised specifically described property and that item is not owned by T at death, the specific gift is deemed revoked and beneficiary takes nothing unless there is evidence that T intended the beneficiary to take a substitute gift. there is a constructional prefernce for viewing such gifts as general gifts (which are not adeemed)
- Stock problems
- if stock was never owned, then executor buys it
- if stock was owned and language is specific (100% of shares of stock), then gift is specific, ademption arises
- if stock splits after execution of will, then gift is specific and beneficiary takes all
- stock dividends are treated the same as stock shares
- court may use acts of independent significance to fill in the blanks in T’s will
- even were T no longer owns property, devisee has right to received unpaid insurance benefit in properyt, condemnation award for taking property, net sale price where property is sold by conservatory, foreclosure proceedings
Revocation by Satisfaction
Revocation by advancement
- an intervivos gift to the beneficiary is deducted from the devise, where the T expressed in a written document that she intended the gift to be in satisfaction of the devise
- an intervivos gift to an heir apparant is deducted from the donee’s intestate share if the donee’s intent is express in a written documents executd by donor and donee
Contracts concerning wills
T can contract to make, not to make, to revoke or not revoke a will - testamentary formalities are not required. contract law controls, not probate law.
- K must be established by
- provisions in will stating material terms of K
- an express refernced in the will to the K and extrinsic evidence
- a writing signed by T evidencing the K
- clear and convincing evidence of an agreement or promise between the D and another person for claimaints benefit
- requirements and rules
- K must be in writing
- K is always revocable
- oral k enforceable if part performance
- Joint & Mutual Wills
- joint wills - wills of 2 or more persons executed on the same piece of paper and intended to be the will of each
- mutual wills - separate wills by 2 or more persons containing provisions for reciprocal benefits
- CA holds, that the execution of a joint or mutual will does not create a presumption of a K not to revoke the will
Intestate Succession
Surviving Spouse/Domestic Partner
- Community property - SS inherits the D’s 1/2 of community property and 1/2 of the quasi CP (so SS ends up with 100% of CP and quasi-CP)
- Separate property
- if D leaves no issue, parents, siblings, etc, then all to SS
- if D is survived by one child, or issue of a predecased child, then 1/2 to SS and 1/2 to Child or child’s issue
- If D is survivied by 2 or more children or issue of predeceased children, then 1/3 to SS and 2/3 to the child or their issue
- If D is survived by parents or siblings, 1/2 to SS and 1/2 to parent or siblings
If Spouse does not Survive (or the remaining share not passing to spouse) passes as follows:
- to issue
- to parents
- to issue of parents (siiblings)
- grandparents or issue of grandparents (aunts uncles)
- issue of predeceased spouse (step-children)
- next of kin
- parents of predeceased spouse (in-laws) or issue of parents of predecased spouse (siblings in law)
- escheats to the state
General principles
- Issue of same degree take per capita, or equally in their own right
- issue of more remote degrees take per capital with representation (issue of predeceased child take parents share per capita. however, if all issue are of same generation, then they get equal shares)
- 240 of the probate code distribution - at the 1st level, give shares to all living person. at the 2nd level, gives shares to all livings person and deceased members of that generation who leave issue. (codifying per capita by generation)
- per stirpes - make the distribution at the first generation, even if everuone is dead. the issue then steps into the shoes of their predeceased ancestor
Children
- adopted childre always treated as natural child of adopting parent
- stepchildren or foster childre are treated as adopted childre if it is established that the paretn would have adopted but for a legal barrier
- non-marital children may inhereint from mother when there is a parent-child relationship and from father only if father acknowledges child, marriage to mother or by court decree of paternity
Distribution of the Estate
- lapse
- rule of lapse, if the beneficiary does not survive T, beneficiaries’ gift lapses or fails unless T expresses a contrary intent in the will. passes by residual, if none then by intestacy
- if the devise is a class gift, only surviving class members take because the will speaks at the time of T’s death. deceased class members share will be deemed to have lapsed
- California anti-lapse statute. a deceased lgatee who is a blood relative of the T or T’s spouse takes by representation. issue of a predeceased devisee may step into shoes of devisee unless will provides otherwise
- rule of lapse, if the beneficiary does not survive T, beneficiaries’ gift lapses or fails unless T expresses a contrary intent in the will. passes by residual, if none then by intestacy
- Simultaneous Death - when two people die at same time, and order of death cannot be established ,property of each decedent is treated as if he predeceased the otehr
- beneficiary who does not survivve by 120 hours is treated as if he predeceased T
- After-acquired proeprty - will passes all property T owned at death, including after acquired property. so residuar gets all after acquired property
- increase during t’s lifetime. stock dividends or splits paid during t’s lifetime go to the beneficeary if the stock is owned by T at death
- increase after T’s death and during probate
- specific devisees - all increases go to beneficiary
- general devisees - do not receive the increase. except beneficiary may recieeved interest paid on beneificeiars gift during the interim between T’s death and idstribution of estate
- abatement - the process by which certain gifts are decreased
- order of abatement if omitted spouse/child/domestic partner
- first abte property not passing by T’s will or revocable inter-vivos trust
- then abate from all beneficiaries of T’s will and revocable inter-vivos trust pro rate to the value of the gift received
- order to pay off general debts of the decedent
- intestate property
- residuary gifts
- general gifts to non-relative
- general gifts to relatives
- specific gifts to non-relatives
- specific gifts to relatives
- order of abatement if omitted spouse/child/domestic partner
- exoneration - not automatic in california. property given by will passes subject to all encumbrances unless to provides otherwise in will