wills and trusts Flashcards
Intestate succession
Property that does not pass by will upon a decedent’s death will be distributed according to the state’s applicable intestacy statutes
D only survived by spouse, no kids
- In most states, if D is survived only by a spouse and no descendants, surviving spouse inherits the entire estate
- In some states, however, a certain portion of the estate will be given to the decedent’s parents’ and their issue
Non UPC rule if D is survived by spouse and kids
In most states, if the decedent is survived by a spouse and descendants, the surviving spouse will inherit a portion of the estate, and the surviving descendants will inherit the rest.
UPC approach if D has spouse and kids
Under the UPC, the surviving spouse will inherit the entire estate if all of the descendants are descendants of the surviving spouse
What if decedent is not survived by a spouse, but has kids
In most states, if decedent is not survived by a spouse, the decedent’s surviving descendants will inherit estate equally
What if D has no spouse, no kids
parentelic approach
- If decedent is not survived by spouse or kids, but their parents are alive, parens will inherit the estate equally
- if there are no surviving parents, the descendants of the decedent’s parents will inherit
Strict per stirpes
- Under strict per stirpes, estate is divided by number of members in first generation of kids who are either alive or survived by descendants
- each living member takes share, and deceased member’s share drops to next generation
Modern per stirpes
- modern per stirpes works same as strict per stirpes, except estate is divided equally at first living generation with a living taker, not the first generation after decedent
Per capita at each generation
- UPC approach
- estate divided at closest generation to decedent with a living taker (like modern per stirpes approach)
- shares of deceased descendants at each level are pooled together and drop down to next level
CL rule on advancements
at common law, gifts to heirs during T’s life were considered advancements and were automatically deducted from their share of the estate
Modern approach to advancements
today, gifts to heirs during Ts life are not advancements on intestate share unless
- the D declared his intent to make the gift an advancement in a contemporaneous writing; or
- heir acknolwedged it to be an advancement in writing
USDA standard
To prove you survived someone else, you must demonstrate that by clear and convincing evidence of survival by 120 hours
Formalities for an attested will
- intent
- writing
- signature
- witnesses
Intent requirement for attested will
T must intend the instrument to function as their will
Witness requirement for wills
will must be signed in the joint presence of, and attested to by, at least two witnesses
Requirements for holographic will
- in handwriting
- intent to be a will
- signature
Handwriting requirement for holographic wills
- in most states, the entire will must be in T’s handwriting and signed
- some states also require holographic wills to be dated
- under the UPC however, only material provisions must be in handwriting (beneficiary + gift)
Intent requirement for holographic will
- it must be clear in the document that it was intended as T’s will
- UPC: words of intent need not be in handwriting and can be shown by extrinsic evidence
Codicil
A codicil is a testamentary addition to a will, executed with the same formalities as a will
Effect of executing a codicil
A valid codicil republishes the will as of the date of the codicil
holographic codicils
A holographic codicil is valid, as is an attested codicil to a holographic will
Substantial compliance doctrine
Under the minority/UPC approach, a document that substantially complies with formality requirements will be recognized as valid, if shown by clear and convincing evidence that T intended it to serve as his will
Will substitute definition
An inter vivos transfer of property will avoid probate and is therefore a will substitute
Time limit to contest will
A will contest must be filed within 6 months after a will is admitted to probate
Who does NOT have standing to contest a will
creditors, spouses of beneficiaries under prior wills, pretermitted heirs
no contest clauses
No contest clauses are enforceable unless the claimant has probable cause to contest the will (majority/UPC rule)
Grounds for contesting will
- lacking capacity
- insane delusion
- undue influence
- fraud
how to show T lacked capcaity to execute will
Claimant must show, at the time T made the will, T lacked the ability to know:
- the nature of the act (why)
- the nature/character of their property (what)
- natural objects of his bounty (who)
- plan of attempted disposition (how)
who what why how when
Insane delusion
T is operating under an insane delusion, which is a belief not based in fact or reason
test for insane delusion
A rational person in T’s situation would not have reached the same conclusion
fraud in inducement for wills
Fraud in inducement occurs when a person misrepresents a fact related to the instrument (usually regarding property or beneficiaries)
Fraud in execution for will
Fraud in the execution occurs when a person misrepresents the contents or nature of the instrument executed by T
Revoking wills, generally,
Generally, a will may be revoked in whole or in part.
revocation of codicils and wills
- revocation of a will revokes its codicils
- revocation of a codicil does not revoke underlying will
Revocation by subsequent instrument
A will can expressly revoke a prior will or impliedly revoke it by inconsistent terms
What happens when there are multiple wills
- the last will controls
- the wills should be read together to the extent possible, but last controls to the extent it is inconsistent with the prior will
How to distinguish codicil from new will
To distinguish a codicil from a will, look for a residuary clause. A will typically has one, but a mere codicil does not
Revocation by physical act
A will may be revoked when T commits a physical act with the intent to revoke, or directs a third party to do so in their direction and in their presence
Lost wills
JDXs are split as to whether a will not found at T’s death creates a presumption that it was revoked
- burden is on proponent to establish existence of will by clear and convincing evidence
- duplicate originals can be used as evidence, but duplicate copies cannot
Destruction of a copy of a will
revocation of a duplicate revokes all copies, but destruction of an unexecuted copy does not serve as revocation of all cpoies
Governing law
- law in JDX of decedent’s domicile at death governs disposition of personal property
- law in JDX of real property governs disposition of that property
- BUT decedent may also select which state law governs terms of will
Line of signt
Under the traditional view, a witness signs the will in the testator’s presence if they are within the testator;s line of sight
Conscious presence test
Under the modern view, a witness signs the will in the testator’s presence if they sign the will within the testator’s range of senses
Common law disinsterested witness rule
Under CL, the signing of the will MUST be witnnessed by two disinterested witnesses (people who do NOT receive any benefits under the will)
Modern approach to interested witnesses
Virtually every state has abolished the common law interested witness rule, and allow interested witnesses to validly witness the signing of a will.
minority modern approach to interested witnesses
- in a minority of states, the interested witnes forfeits his interitance unless two additional disinterested witnesses serve as valid witnesses
- Some states only allow interested witnesses to inherit their intestate share of the estate
Personal signature requirement for holographic wills
in states that recognize holographic wills, they are only valid if the testator signs it personally (no proxy signatures)
Integration of documents in a will
Integration of documents arises when pages or portions of a will become separated. A document will be integrated into a will if
- the testator intended the document to be part of the will: AND
- the document was physically present at the time the will was executed
Incorporation by reference
Incorporation by reference deals with the incorporation of extrinsic doucments into the will (rather than pages or portions of the original will)
When will a doc be incorporated by reference
In most states,a document or writing may be incorporated by reference when
- T intended to incorporate the document into the will
- the document was in existence at the time the will was executed; AND
- the document is sufficiently described in the will
Facts of independent significance
A court may give effect to events that would change the disposition of a T’s estate after the T has executed their will IF those events have significance apart from a change in the testator’s testamentary scheme
Devises through unattested memorandum
Devises to persons named in an unattested memorandum, not incorporated by reference, are invalid on the basis that the memo has NO independent significance apart from the will
if it meets incorporation by reference, however, it’s OK
What can a codicil do
A codicil can explain, modify, amend, or revoke provisions of an existing will
Republishing will
At the time a person executes a codicil, the original will is treated as republished and is deemed to have been executed on the date the codicil is executed
Codicil curing defects in will
Republication can cure defects in a will that might affect the validity of specific devises (e.g., republication by codicil that is properly witnessed can save a devise to an interested witness)
Can a codicil republish an invalid will
Most courts hold that a codicil cannot republish an invalid will as a whole
Holographic codicil curing holographic will
In states that recognize holographic wills, a holographic codicil can validate a will that was not originally valid because it failed to meet statutory requirements
Revocation by subsequent written instrument
A will can be revoked by
- a subsequent written instrument executed for the sole purpose of revoking prior will; or
- subsequent will/codicil that contains a revocation clause or provisions inconsistent with the prior will (only revokes to extent there is conflict)
Revocation by physical act
A will is revoked if the T or anothe person at his direction and in his presence burns, tears, destroys, or obliterates the will with intent to revoke it
Revoking will by words of cancellation
- under CL, words of cancellation are valid only if they come in physical contact with the words of the will
- under UPC, words of cancellation need not touch any words of will, but must be somewhere on the will to validly revoke it
Revocation through marking it up partially
In most states, when marks of cancellation (crossing out a word) are found on a will known to last have been in the testator’s possession, a presumption arises that marks were made by T with intent to revoke.
it sure as shit doesnt say shiv
overcoming presumption of partial revocation through marking
The burden to overcome this presumption is on the party claiming that the devise has not been revoked
- if devise is revoked, it passes as part of residuary estate.
- Some states do not permit partial revocations at all
Revocation by divorce
- in some circumstances, dispositions under will are revoked by operation of law
- at CL divorce did not revoke T’s devise to former spouse
- TODAY, however, divorce revokes provisions in will to former spouse UNLESS the will or court expressly provides otherwise. Devise may be revived if the spouses remarry
What if provision in favor of former spouse is revoked by operation of law
If provision in favor of former spouse is revoked by operation of law, the devise passes as if the former spouse predeceased the testator
Dependent relative revocation
Under DRR, a valid revocation of a will may be ignored if the will was revoked under T’s mistaken belief of law or fact that the T could revive an earlier will, or modify his disposition of property by codicil or new will
When does DRR apply
DRR only applies when the court can determine that the T would have preferred the disposition in the revoked will over the disposition resulting from a finding that they died intestate
Revival of a will at CL
Under CL, the revocation of a subsequent will automatically revives the prior will (no intent requirement)
Revival at modern law
Under the modern view, most states permit revival of a revoked will if
- it is evident T intended revoked will to take effect as executed; or
- T republishes the revoked will with a subsequent will or codicil that complies with formalities for execution
Lapse
If a beneficiary named in a will predeceases the testator, absent an alternate disposition of the devise specified by T, the devise lapses into the residue unless a jurisdiction’s anti lapse statute preserves the devise
Anti lapse statutes
Generally, under an antilapse statute, devises will vest in the descendants of the predeceased beneficiary if they
- are a blood relative of T; and
- have descendants who survive T
Residue of residue at CL
Under CL, an invalidated residuary devise passed to T’s heirs through intestate succession
Residue of residue modern approach
Under the modern approach, if the residue is devised to two or more persons, an invalidated residuary devise will pass to the other residuary beneficiaries rather than the T’s heirs
Ademption
Under the doctrine of ademption, if the subject matter of a specific devise is not in the estate at the time of T’s death, the devise adeems or fails
Intent for ademption at CL
At CL, testator’s intent for ademption was irrelevant
intent and ademption modern view
In most JDXs today, a specific devise will adeem ONLY IF the T indended for the devise to fail. If they did not intend for it to fail, beneficiary is entitled to
- any prop in T’s estate which T acquired as a replacement for the specific devise, or
- a monetary devise equal to the value of the specific devise
Generic descriptions of property in will
Any property described in generic terms is interpreted under the circumstances at the time of T’s death, rather than when the will is executed
Slayer statutes
A person who feloniously and intentionally kills the decedent is barred from claiming a share of their estate as either an heir or beneficiary under the D’s will.
- generally, the estate is distributed as if killer predeceased the decedent
Disclaiming interest
A beneficiary under a will can disclaim or renounce their interest under a T’s will causing the disclaimed property to pass as if they predeceased the T
Requirements forr a valid disclaimer
A valid disclaimer must
- be in writing
- describe interest being disclaimed sufficiently; AND
- be delibered or filed
Timing of disclaimers at CL
Under CL, a disclaimer must be made within a reasonable amount of time
Modern timing for disclaimers
Some states require a disclaimer to be made within 9 months after T’s death
Timing of disclaimers under UPC
Under the UPC, a disclaimer may be made at any time
Specific devise
A devise is specific if the subject matter of the devise is specific real or personal property
General devise
A devise is general if it can be satisfied with any of the estate’s assets