Wills and Administration - Fundamentals Flashcards
Property passing outside of the will and intestacy
What are four types of property that pass outside of the will/intestacy?
Joint property;
Life assurance policies;
Pension benefits;
Trust property owned by the deceased
In what order does the solicitor deal with the deceased’s assets?
a) Property passing outside the will
b) Property passing under the will
c) Undisposed property
What is a revocation clause?
A clause revoking prior wills.
What are the five categories of gifts?
a) Specific - “My 100 shares in Apple to my son”
b) General - “100 shares in Apple to my son”. If none exist at death, they must be purchased. They are rare.
c) Demonstrative - General in nature, but paid from a specific fund. “£500 to X paid from my Monzo account.
d) Pecuniary -
e) Residuary - “The rest of my estate to x”. All property/money left after debts, expenses and other gifts. Usually most substantial gift.
Validity of will
What are the three requirements for a valid will?
- Testamentary capacity
- Testamentary intention.
- Formalities for execution observed.
Validity: Capacity
What are the requirements for capacity that the testator must meet?
(1) Over 18
(2) Understands:
- the nature of his act and its broad effects (the fact that they are making a will)
- the extent of his property (roughly); and
- the moral claims he ought to consider.
(3) Not suffering from an insane delusion.
Validity: Capacity
What is the Parker v Felgate exception to the general rule that testators must have capacity at the time of execution?
The will is valid if:
a) The testator gave instructions to a solicitor, who prepared the will in accordance with the instructions.
b) When giving instructions, the testator had the required capacity.
c) When executing the will, the testator appreciates they are signing a will prepared in accordance with their previous instructions.
Validity: Capacity
What can the Court of Protection do if a testator is mentally incapable of making a valid will?
What are the requirements?
Empower an authorised person to execute a “statutory will”, made effective by affixing the court seal.
Requirements:
- Full details of the deceased, their family, property, previous wills are given to the Court.
- It is in the testator’s best interests.
Validity: Capacity
What is the “Golden Rule”?
A solicitor preparing a will for a testator whose mental state is in doubt should ask a medical practitioner to provide a written report of testamentary capacity, and ask the doctor to witness the will.
Validity
Who bears the burden of proving the validity of the will?
The general rule: The person asserting that the will is valid must prove it.
However, there is a presumption of capacity which the executors can rely upon.
Validity: Capacity
What is the presumption of capacity?
The testator is presumed to have mental capacity if:
(1) the will is rational on its face.
(2) the testator shows no evidence of mental confusion prior to making the will.
The presumption shifts the burden to someone challenging the will’s validity on the ground that the testator lacked capacity.
The courts are less likely to find a lack of capacity where the will was prepared by an experienced, independent solicitor.
Validity: Intention
What is the meaning of testamentary intention?
The testator intends:
a. to make a will (general intention) and;
b. to make that particular will (specific intention).
Validity: Intention
Explain specific intention further.
The testator knows and approves of the contents of the will at the time that it is executed (unless Parker v Felgate applies).
In relation to intention, what presumption operates to displace the general rule that the person asserting the will’s validity must prove it?
The presumption of knowledge and approval:
The testator is presumed to have the requisite knowledge and approval if he:
- has capacity; and
- has read and executed the will
In which situations is the presumption of knowledge and approval disapplied?
2 situations.
- Testator is blind/illiterate/not signing personally.
- Suspicious circumstances: E.g. prepared by a major beneficiary of the will, or a close relative of a major beneficiary).
Best practice to avoid problems: Include a statement that “the will was read over to the testator, who knew and approved its contents”.
If not, the Probate Registry would require evidence to prove knowledge and approval before granting probate.
If the testator easily proves capacity and knowledge/approval, how else can a person challenge the will?
- Force or fear (actual/threatened injury)
- Fraud (e.g. being misled by some pretence)
- Undue influence (testator’s freedom of choice overcome by intolerable pressure - coercion/duress).
- Actual mistake - presumption of knowledge and approval disapplied.
Note: Undue influence is very difficult to prove.
Mistake: misunderstanding the true legal meaning of words used will not invalidate the will.
What are the formalities of execution according to section 9 of the Wills Act 1837?
The will must be:
(a) in writing.
(b) signed.
(c) witnessed.
- Any kind of signing, including crosses, thumbprints. “Your loving mother” was held to be valid.
- The testator must intend to give effect to the will by signature.
If the testator is too weak to sign, how can the will be signed?
Another person can sign the will on behalf of the testator, in the testator’s presence and at their direction.
What are the two stages to the process of witnessing a signature?
(1) The testator’s signature is made or acknowledged in the presence of two witnesses at the same time.
(2) The witnesses must sign or acknowledge in the presence of the testator (not necessarily in the presence of each other).
What does “presence” mean in the context of witnessing a signature?
Mental presence: Must be aware that the testator is signing a document. Need not know that it is a will.
Physical presence: Able to see the testator signing.
What does “acknowledging a signature” mean?
An alternative to signing: if
(1) The testator does not sign in the presence of a witness. The will can still be valid if the testator acknowledges his signature to the two witnesses.
(2) The witness does not sign in the presence of the testator. The will can still be valid if the witness acknowledges his signature to the testator.
What are the formal requirements for the capacity of witnesses?
- Over 18
Capable of understanding significance of being a witness. - Not blind.
If any of the witnesses is a beneficiary under the will, or is a spouse of a beneficiary, how is the will’s validity affected?
The will remains valid, but the gift to the witness or their spouse fails.
What is the exception to the rule that wills must comply with the s.9 requirements?
Privileged wills. A will made on actual military service or mariners/seamen at sea.
The only requirement for these are that the testator intends to dispose of his property after death.
In relation to formalities, what presumption operates to displace the general rule that the person asserting the will’s validity must prove it?
The presumption of due execution:
If the will includes an attestation clause, the will is presumed to have been duly executed.
The attestation clause recites that the s.9 formalities were observed e.g. “Signed by the testator in our joint presence and then by us in hers”. This is an attestation clause.
Where there is no attestation clause, the Probate Registry will require an affidavit of due execution from a witness or other person present during execution
Establishing the testator’s intention
When will the court look to extrinsic evidence to ascertain the testator’s intention?
To the extent that:
a) any part is meaningless;
b) any part is ambiguous;
c) other evidence shows that the language used is ambiguous in light of surrounding circumstances.
Establishing Entitlement
When can the court rectify a will?
The testator’s intentions are clear, but the will fails to carry them out due to
a) a clerical error
b) a failure to understand his instructions
Very narrow scope. Misunderstanding the law would not be included.
Entitlement: property passing under the will
For property, the will is said to speak from….
This means…
For property, the will speaks from the date of death, unless a contracy intention appears.
Entitlement: property passing under the will
What are the effects of the testator referring to a gift of “my car” - would it be the car at the date of death or at the time of execution? What about a gift of “my collection of cars”?
“My car” is interpreted as a “contrary intention” to the will speaking from date of death = the car owned at execution.
In contrast, “My collection of cars” does not single out any specific car. It would therefore mean any item fitting that description at death.