Wills Flashcards
Requirements for a Validly Executed Will/Codicil
1) T must be 18 years old
2) Signed by T (or proxy)
- Any mark intended as T’s signature
3) Two attesting Ws
4) Each W must sign in T’s presence
- Order of signing doesn’t matter if contemporaneous transaction
Does not require:
- T sign at foot or end of will
- W know that he is witnessing a will
- Ws sign in each other’s presence
Witnessing will in T’s presence
Illinois: W must be in T’s line of sight. Uninterrupted scope of T’s vision, so that T could have seen if he had looked.
UPC and Majority: Conscious Presence Test. Conscious of where W is and what W is doing.
Attorney Liability for Negligent Preparation
Illinois: Attorney’s duty runs to client and to intended beneficiaries of the service. Privity of contract is not a defense.
Minority rule: Privity of contract defense. Duty runs only attorney’s client.
Attesting W as Will Beneficiary (Interested Witness Statute)
Interested W never affects validity of the will.
Beneficiary-witness loses legacy, unless:
- Supernumerary Rule: Two disinterested attesting Ws
- “Whichever is least” Rule: witness-beneficiary would take a share of the estate if the will were not admitted to probate, in which case he takes the lesser of the bequest or the intestate share
Beneficiary spouse-witness
- Illinois: Voids legacy
- Majority: No problem. Only bequest to witness herself triggers voidance.
Executor-witness
- Illinois: No compensation for the executor who signs the will
- Majority: Yes, can be compensated as executor.
UPC: Abolish this statute.
Holographic Wills exception
Illinois: Does not recognize exception. All wills must be signed by two attesting Ws.
Majority and UPC: Recognizes handwritten, signed, but unwitnessed wills.
Disposition of real property governed by laws of state where property is located.
Revocation of Wills
1) Later testamentary instrument; or
2) Physical act
- Cross out words of will, cross out signature, tear it up, burn it, etc.
- Must destroy the will itself. Intent is not enough.
- By another person? Must be at T’s direction and in T’s presence.
Presumptions
Dependent Relative Revocation
Changes to will after execution
Proof of Lost Will Statute
1) Proof of due execution (testimony of W’s)
2) Cause of will’s nonproduction must be proved
3) Contents must be substantially proved
Presumptions Regarding Revocation
1) Will last seen in T’s possession, not found after death –> presumption that T revoked by physical act.
2) Will last seen in T’s possession, found mutilated after death –> presumption that T revoked by physical act.
3) Revocation by Implication: One “last will” followed by a second “last will” –> try to read second as a codicil revoking inconsistencies in the first. If wholly inconsistent, then first will is revoked by implication.
Dependent Relative Revocation
Example: T executes Will #1. Then he executes Will #2, which expressly revokes Will #1. Then he revokes Will #2 by physical act, with the hope that Will #1 will be revived (which it can’t). Solution? DRR!
Revocation is disregarded when act was dependent on a mistake of law or fact as to the validity of another disposition. “Second best solution.”
Solution to example: Will #2 would be revived, but would have to be proved by Proof of Lost Wills Statute.
Doesn’t apply if to disregard revocation would totally defeat T’s intent.
Changes on face of will after execution
Partial Revocation by Physical Act?
- Illinois: Partial revocation by physical act is not valid.
- Majority and UPC: It is valid.
Words added to a will after signed and witnessed are disregarded!
- DRR, the original will may not have been changed.
Anti-lapse statute
When beneficiary predeceases T, gift lapses. Also applies to void gifts (i.e., B was dead at execution)
Elements:
1) Predeceasing B must have been in the prescribed degree of relationship to T (in IL, child or other descendent)
2) Predeceasing B must have left descendants who survived T.
If these elements fail, gift falls into residuary estates.
Lapse in Residuary Gift
If anti-lapse statute does not apply, surviving residuary Bs take the entire estate in proportion to their interests in the residue
“Class gift” rule of construction
If member of class (e.g., the children of X) predeceases, surviving class members take.
Rule of Convenience: Class is closed when some class member is entitled to a distribution.
Uniform Simultaneous Death Act
Property passes as though the deceased had survived.
- Wills: As though T survived and B predeceased.
- Intestacy: As though T survived and heirs predeceased
- Insurance: As though insured survived and B predeceased
- Joint Tenants or Tenants by the Entirety: treat as tenancy in common, 1/2 passes to both as though they survived.
UPC: 120-hour rule
Effect of T Marriage after Will
Illinois: No effect on the will. Elective Share Statute!
UPC: Omitted spouse takes intestate share of T’s estate.
Effect of Divorce after Will
Final decree of divorce or annulment –> treat as though former spouse predeceased T.
“Divorce Revokes” statute does not apply to life insurance policy naming wife as B.