Wills Flashcards

1
Q

Integration

A

A writing constitutes a will or part of a will if the testator intended it to be a will and if it was present at the time of execution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Incorporation by Reference

A
  1. Need a document or writing
  2. Must have been in existence when will was executed
  3. Document must be
    clearly identified in the will
  4. T must have intended o incorporate document into will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Facts of Independent Significance

A

Blanks in a will can be filled by reference to facts of significance independent of the will, using trustworthy parol evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pour Over Validation

A

1.Incorporation by reference
2. facts of independent Significance
3. Uniform Testamentary Additions to Trusts Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can a will be probated?

A

Will will be probated if it complies with the law
1. where the will is to be probated
2. where the will was executed
3. the place of T’s domicile at the time of execution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Capacity

A
  1. 18 years old
  2. T understands extent of prop.
  3. T understands the nature of his bounty
  4. T knows the nature of his act is to make a will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lack of Capacity

A

The entire will in invalid, except in the case where capacity was lacked as to a 2nd will revoking a prior will for which T had capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fraud

A

1.Misrepresentation of a material fact
2. Person Committing fraud knows it is false (scienter)
3. Made for the purpose of inducing action or inaction
4. Actually induces action or inaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fraudulent Inducement

A

The wrongdoer’s representations affect the content of T’s will. Only serves to invalidate the parts of the will affected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fraudulent Execution

A

Someone forges T’s signature or T given doc to sign which is purportedly non-testamentary. Invalidates entire will .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fraudulent Prevention of Revocation

A

Results in a constructive trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Prima Facie Undue Influence

A
  1. T is susceptible to some weakness like physical, emotional, financial.
  2. Opportunity
  3. Active participation
  4. Unnatural result (not unnatural to prefer one child of another)
  5. Wrongdoer benefits financially
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Presumption of Undue Influence

A
  1. Confidential Relationship (T placed an unusual amount of confidence in the beneficiary, and relied on the beneficiary)
  2. Active Participation
  3. Unnatural Result
  4. Wrongdoer Benefits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Statutory Undue Influence

A

A donative transfer is presumed product of undue influence if to:
1. drafter,
2. fiduciary who transcribed instrument,
3. care custodian of a dependent adult (if instrument executed during care or within 90 days of care,
4. a spouse, domestic partner, cohabitant, employee, or relative within 3rd degree of any of the foregoing

Presumption is conclusive for drafter and associates, rebuttable for others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Statutory undue Influence Exception

A

Presumption is inapplicable to:
1. spouse or cohabitant of transferor (even if person was the drafter) or
2. any transfer if reviewed by independent attorney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Insane Delusion

A
  1. T had false belief
  2. that false belief was the product of a sick mind
    3a. In CA, there must be no evidence to support the belief
    3b. A belief is delusional if no rational person would believe it (even if some factual basis exists)
  3. Delusion must have affected T’s will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Mistake in Execution

A

T signs the wrong document, mistaking it for a non-testamentary instrument. Will is not probated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Mistake in Validity of Subsequent Instrument

A

If T revokes her valid will, or portion thereof, in mistaken belief that a substantially identical will or codicil effectuates her intent, then, by operation of law, the revocation of the first is deemed conditional, dependent, and relative to the second effectuating T’s intent and being valid.

Even if lost or destroyed, the first will can be probated if at least one witness testifies to its contents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Mistake Involving Living Children

A

A child is pretermitted if born or adopted after all testamentary instruments are executed and not provided for therein. Pretermitted child receives his intestate share.

If child is born/adopted before execution of all testamentary documents and he is omitted from them, the child takes nothing (unless T mistakenly believed them dead or non-existent).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attested Will

A

A valid will must be:
1. In writing
2. Signed by either T, third person in T’s presence at T’s direction, conservator pursuant to a court order
3. Signed in the presence of two Ws, who are both present at same time (if T previously signed alone, he must acknowledge his signature in presence of two Ws)
4. Ws must understand the the instrument they sign is Ws will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Common Misconceptions of Attested Wills

A
  1. Ws do not have to sign in the presence of each other
  2. Ws do not have to sing is presence of T
  3. T doesn’t have to declare “this is my will”
  4. T doesn’t have to sign before the Ws, no order of signing
  5. Neither T nor Ws have to sign at the end, anywhere is okay
22
Q

Interested W

A

A W who is a beneficiary under the will. Can also be a W who is not named in will but receives substantial indirect benefit.

Will is not invalid, but unless there are at least 2 other disinterested Ws, a presumption arises that the W secured the gift by wrongdoing. This presumption can be rebutted by if not then they will take an amount no greater than what they would have received in intestacy.

23
Q

Holographic Wills

A
  1. Signed by T anywhere
  2. Material provisions are in T’s handwriting

T’s intent that the doc be a will need not be stated on the face of the instrument and can be proven by extrinsic evidence. T’s intent can be part of a printed commercial will form.

24
Q

Holographic Will Dates

A

A date is note required on a holographic will, but lack of date can create 2 problems:

  1. Inconsistent Wills (An undated holographic will is invalid to the extent of inconsistency with another will unless the undated holograph’s time of execution is established to be later. _
  2. Capacity (An undated holographic will is invalid if T lacked capacity at any time it may have been executed, unless established that executed during a time of capacity)
25
Codocil
Definition: A testamentary instrument modifying, amending, or revoking a will. Must meet same formalities as attested or holographic will. Republishing: A codicil republishes a will so that the will is deemed re-executed at time of codicil. May have effect on pretermission and incorporation by reference. Revocation: if T executes a will, then executes codicil, and subsequently revokes codicil, rebuttable presumption that T intended only to revoke codicil. But, if T executes a will, then executes codicil, then subsequently revokes the will, presumption T intended to revoke both.
26
Revocation by Physical Act
1. Will must be burned, torn, destroyed, or obliterated 2. T must have the simultaneous intent to revoke 3. The act must be done by T, or by someone in T's presence and at his direction
27
Cancellation and Interlineation
Crossing out or writing between the lines, generally revokes the challenged provisions yet does not add the new material (unless all material terms in T's handwriting, thus a holographic codicil).
28
Duplicate Wills
Fully executed originals of a will, and T, or someone in T's presence and at his direction, revokes by physical act one of the originals, the other is revoked as a matter of law.
29
Mutilated Wills
If will is found in mutilated condition at T's death, and when last seen was in T's possession, rebuttable presumption that T mutilated with intent to revoke.
30
Revocation by Subsequent Written Instrument
Subsequent instrument can revoke will expressly (stating so) or implicitly (disposing of same property differently). As later holographic will can revoke an earlier attested will. Revival: if later, revoking written instrument is itself revoked, the prior will not be revived unless T manifests intent to revive the prior will. Extrinsic evidence of intent may be offered.
31
Omitted/Pretermitted Child
A will executed prior to birth/adoption of child and which omits that child is revoked as to that child, who receives intestate share and any assets in inter vivos trust, and other gifts are abated or reduced to effectuate. 3 exceptions: 1. T's failure to provide for child appears on the face of the testamentary instrument. 2. T provided for the child outside the testamentary plan, with the intent it be in lieu of a provision in these instruments 3. When testamentary plan was executed, T already had kids and gave substantially all of his estate to the parent of the omitted child.
32
Omitted Spouse
A person who marries T after T executes all testamentary instruments and is not provided for therein. Spouse received statutory share of assets owned at death and assets in inter vivos trust. Statutory share is 1/2 CP and intestate share of SP (not to exceed 1/2 SP estate). 3 exceptions: 1. T's failure to provide for spouse appears on face of instrument 2. T provided for spouse outside the testamentary plan 3. if omitted spouse signed a waiver.
33
Final Dissolution of Marriage
Disposition of property to spouse is revoked upon annulment or final dissolution of marriage (but not on legal separation alone). Reinstate if will unchanged an later re-marriage. These are the default rules if will does not provide otherwise.
34
Classification of Property Holdings
Specific Devise: Gift of a particular item which is distinct from all others in T's estate/ General Devise: A gift of general economic benefit, payable out of assets of estate Demonstrative Devise: a gift from a particular fund (from my B&A account), but if it isn't enough then executor can take from general property
35
Ademption by Extinction
Applies only to specific devise. At Common Law: When a specific gift fails b/c not owned by T at time of death, then addeemed by extinction and beneficiary takes nothing. CA Law: Intent is important- in determining whether gift is specific or general AND in determining whether T intended the gift to fail.
36
Ademption by Satisfaction
A gift is satisfied pre-death to the extent T transfers proper to the beneficiary and: 1. a contemporaneous writing signed by either T or beneficiary states satisfaction, or 2. a specific gift is given
37
Ademption by Advancement
Intestate share is satisfied pre-death to the extent D transfers property to heir apparent and a contemporaneous writing signed by either D or heir apparent states advancement.
38
Spousal Protection
Re CP: T's will can dispose of only 1/2 half of the Cp. Surviving spouse owns other 1/2 at T's death. Re Quasi-CP: T (acquiring spouse) can dispose of only 1/2 of the quasi-CP by will. Surviving spouse owns other 1/2 at T's death. Widow's Election: Arises when T attempts to dispose of more than 1/2 CP. Widow can accept the gift given in T's will OR Widow can renounce all benefits given in the will and confirm her rights to 1/2 CP.
39
Illusory Transfers of QCP and the Widow's Election
An inter vivos transfer by decedent (acquiring spouse) of the QCP to a 3rd person without consideration is allowed. Because the surviving spouse (non-acquiring spouse) has a mere expectancy in the QCP and not a property interest. The transfer will not be allowed when the transfer of the QCP is deemed illusory and the SS invokes the widow's election. It is illusory when the decedent retains some interest or control over the property effectively creating a fraud on the survivor.
40
Unworthy Heirs
Murder: Certain killers cannot take any benefits by will or intestacy (those who feloniously and intentionally kill decedent). Conviction is conclusive. If no conviction, the probate court will determine guilt by a preponderance of the evidence. Killer is deemed to have predeceased T and anti-lapse statute does not apply. Abuser: One who commits elder abuse against one who could not mange his affairs cannot take from the decedent by will or intestacy if the abuse if proven by clear and convincing evidence. Abuser is deemed to have predeceased the decedent.
41
Lapse and Anti-Lapse
A beneficiary must survive T in order to take a devise. Applies to wills and revocable trusts. Lapse Rule: If the beneficiary does not survive T, the beneficiary's gift lapses. If the gift lapses, unless a contrary intent is expressed in the will, the gift falls into the residue (if already in the reside then goes to other co-residue devisees; isotheres intestacy). Anti-Lapse Statute: If the predeceased beneficiary is "kindred" of T or T's spouse/former spouse, and the beneficiary leaves issues, the issue will step into the shoes of the predeceased beneficiary.
42
Simultaneous Death
If devolution of property is dependent on one person surviving another, and it cannot be determines by clear and convincing evidence who survived whom, then it is deemed the one person did not survive the other.
43
Increase During and After T's Lifetime
During: Stock dividends paid during T's lifetime go to beneficiary if owned by T at T's death. After: Specific devises (dividends, splits, rents, cash dividends) all increase goes to the beneficiary, General Devises don't receive any increase in value.
44
Abatement for Debts
In the absence of directions in the will, property abates as follows: 1. Intestate Prop. 2. Residuary gifts 3. General gifts to persons other than relatives 4.General gifts to relatives 5. Specific gifts to persons other than relatives 6. Specific gifts to relatives Prop. abates within a class pro rata, proportional to value of the gift
45
Abatement for Omitted Child/Spouse
Abates in this order: 1. Prop. not passing by will or revocable trust. 2. Abate from all beneficiaries of T's will and trust pro rata A court can exempt a specific gift if obviously contrary to T's intent.
46
Exoneration
Debt is extinguished when: Common Law - If T devised specific gift subject to an encumbrance for which T was personally liable, the executor was required to automatically pay off the debt before passing the prop. to the beneficiary. CA - No automatic exoneration. Devisee takes prop subject to the encumbrance. Unless T's will states specific gift is to be exonerated.
47
Intestate Succession: Surviving Spouse
Inherits 1/2 CP and 1/2 QCP. Separate Property is divided as follows: 1. if decedent leaves no issue, parents, sibling, or issue of a deceased sibling, then all to SS. 2. if decent survived by 1 kid, or issue of predeceased kid, then 1/2 to SS and 1/2 to kid/issue. 3. if decedent survived by 2 or more kids, or issues of predeceased kids, then 1.3 to SS and 2/3 to the kids or their issue. 4. If decedent survived only by one issue, but leaves parent or sibling, then 1/2 to parent/sibling and 1/2 to SS.
48
Intestate Scheme
1. Issue 2. Parents 3. Issue of Parents 4. Grandparent, issues of Grandparents, issue of predeceased spouse, next of kin, parents of a predeceased spouse, issue of a parent's predeceased spouse, escheat.
49
Per Capita
Whenever issue taken by intestacy, or if testamentary instrument does not specify how taken, issue takes as follows: 1. Issue of same degree take per capita (equally and in own right) 2. Issue of more remote degree take "per capita with representation" 2a. Make the initial division of share of the estate- on share for each line of issue- at that firs generational level at which there are survivors 2b. All persons living at the first generational level take one share 2c. the shares of the deceased persons t the first generational level are combined and then divided equally among the takers at the next generational level in the same way.
50
Per Stirpes
Only if specified "per stirpes" or "by representation" distribute at first line of descent even if no one alive. Issue step into shoes of predecessor. Thus, issue in same generational line could take different shares.