WILLS Flashcards
Omitted
A child born or adopted before all testamentary instruments are executed and not provided for in any instrument is omitted
Omitted Child Receives:
Intestate share, unless 1 of the 3 exceptions apply (then child gets nothing)
(1) the intent to disinherit appears on the will itself
(2) T provided for the child by transfer outside the will & intended that transfer be in lieu of inheritance
(3) T had one or more children, and devised most of his estate to the parent of the omitted child **do math to show majority of estate
Pour Over Wills
Left out
Where a will leaves out all or part of the testator’s property to the trustee of an inter vivos trust
3 Methods for validating a “pour-over” provision
how do we know the trust has the property
DISCUSS ALL 3 and say which one would work / not work
(1) Incorporation by reference (trust is incorporated in the will, unless trust was amended after will)
(2) trust is a fact of independent significance; OR
(3) Uniform Testamentary Additions to Trust Act (by statute, validates pour over provision where trust is in existence at time of execution)
Valid Holographic Will
(a) can be signed anywhere in the will; and
(b) material provisions are in T’s own handwriting: the gifts made, the beneficiaries names, and t’s signature
**date not required, but lack of is problematic (if no date & its established that T lacked capacity at any time during which will might have been made, then the holographic will is invalid) / unless established that executed at time when T had capacity
4 Methods for Revocation
PAOW
(1) Physical Act
(2) Subsequent written instrument
(3) operation of law
(4) ademption
Physical Act: Revocation
(a) will must be [burned, torned, scribbled out, destroyed / erased]
(b) testator must have simultaneous intent to revoke; and
(c) must be done either by the testator, or someone in T’s presence and at his direction
Cancellation
Cancellation occurs when the testator crosses out a provision of his will. The crossed-out portion of the will does not apply to the will unless revived or reinstated via dependant relative revocation (‘DRR)
Crossing out / lining through [can’t be used to increase gift]
Writting null and void = valid cancellation, cancelled portion goes to residuary devisee or by intestacy
Interlineation
Interlineation occurs when the testator writes a term or provision into a valid will, typically after cancelling a prior provision. Generally, interlineated provisions are not valid unless the interlineation is a valid holographic codicil.
Approach for Cancellation, Interlineation, Holograohic Codicil and DRR
4 issue headings
(1) Cancellation [irac and describe ONLY what is crossed out]
(2) Interlineation [IRAC and describe what was handwritten into will]
(3) Holographic Codicil [IRAC and analyze material provisions and whether they are all handwritten]
(4) DRR [if OG gift is revoked, analyze DRR to see if saves the gift]
Holographic Codicil
A holographic codicil is a handwritten testamentary instrument that modifies, amends, or revokes a valid will. In order for the holographic codicil to be valid, it must be
(a) signed by the testator and
(b) all the material provisions, such as the beneficiary and the subject matter of the devise, must be in the testator’s handwriting.
A typed will w/ handwritten interlineations (about gifts and beneficiares) is not valid (invalid holographic will), unless the material provisions are also in handwriting as required
PLUS, OG gift would be revoked, unless DRR [if OG gift was to give less and theres an interlineation to increase the gift, then apply DRR and save OG gift)
If the OG gift was to give more and then interlineation to give ess, then DRR doesn’t apply, ands the entire gift is revoked (devisee gets nothing), unless the entire will was holographic.
DRR – Validity of Subsequent Instrument
Will #2 is invalid and fails to effectuate testator’s intent
Timeline–> Testator makes Will 1, then makes will 2, then revokes 1 (bc he thinks will 2 is gucci and captures his intent, but will 2 is either invalid or fails to effectuate T’s intent
DRR allows the court to ignore the revocation of the will #1 on the grounds that testator revoked will #1 bc he mistakenly believed will#2 effectuated his intent
Revival
If T makes will#1, revokes it through will #2, then destroys will #2, will #1 is not automatically revived, unless T manifests the intent to do so.
Revival – destroys will#2
DRR– T wanted will#2 but failed to capture T’s intent or invalid
Compare w/ DRR
Widow’s Election
In California, a surviving spouse has a right to the decedent’s spouse’s share of community property resulting in the surviving spouse having a right to 100% of the community property since she would already retain her original 1/2 share. When the decedent-spouse attempts to devise a portion of property in a will that is CP, the surviving spouse may take under the will or elect to take her share of CP
Per Capita Distribution
In CA, the default method of distribution is ‘per capita’ unless the will specifies per stirpes
per capita means to each person equally starting at the first generation where someone is living. if a person from that generation is deceased, then their share goes to their issue to be given split equally.