Wills Flashcards
What is the CL exoneration of liens?
Under the common-law exoneration-of-liens doctrine, the recipient of a specific devise of real property can use the remaining assets in the testator’s estate to pay off any encumbrances on that property.
What is a residuary clause in a will?
Devise of all property not disposed of by specific (my fur coat or my farm to A), general ($1000 to B, half my estate to my son), or demonstrative (evise primarily payable from designated source, but secondarily payable from general asset) devise. It can pass failed gifts from the will to another person.
What happens when a gift in a will fails and there is no designated residuary to catch all the random stuff in the will?
When there is no will or a will fails to address the disposition of the decedent’s real property, then the property will transfer to the decedent’s heir(s) by intestate succession or, if the decedent has no heirs, escheat to the state.
what the fuck is even a codicil
supplement that amends or revokes will in whole or in part
what is probate
Figuring out the estate-settling claims against estate, figuring out who gets what
what do you call a spouse in a will
MARITAL PARTNER
“issue” definition
decedant’s kids, their kids, etc.
collaterals re: a will
relatives through a common ancestor (sisters, cousins, aunts etc)
If a person dies intestate, what rule decides who gets his stuff?
ONLY the state legislature’s rules. The dead guy’s desires or intent, if no will, don’t matter.
The HEIRS are those entitled to take a share if no will: generally, spouse and kids. Have to survive dead guy
What is the controlling laws systems in Wills?
Majority common law rule OR
Uniform Probate Code or UPC
What if decedent and heir die at once? like car accident, no one knows who died first
Under UPC, heir must have survived by 120 hours, shown by C&C evidence
State have similar rules
What sort of sexy partner is an heir?
MARRIED partner. Not common law.
What amount can spouse take from estate, in various scenarios?
- Dead guy has surviving wife and kids, all from them both. Neither has other kids. Spouse takes ALL.
- Dead survived only by spouse and one parent . Spouse takes $300K and 75% of remaining estate. 25% to parent
- Dead guy survived by spouse, mutual kids, and spouse has previous kids. Spouse takes $225K and 50% remaining estate
- Dead guy survived by spouse and his previous kids. Spouse takes $150K and 50% remaining estate
- Dead guy does not have kids or parents, ONLY spouse. Spouse takes everything
Rule: always satisfy spouse first. Then kids.
When Dead dies intestate, what do his kids get?
[No distinction between bio and adoptive kids, but step-parent adoption does not prevent kid from inheriting from both dads]
DRAW THE FAMILY TREE
- pre stirpes inheritance. Shares equal according to lineal line–total # of surviving kids and issue. The divide by representation. If issue survives parent, stand in parents’ place.
3 kids: B, C, D. All dead, survived by kids. Cut estate into 3 shares. Each of those 3 then gets divided among its kids. - per capita with representation: make the first divide at a generation where one member survives. So if all 3 kids are dead, give each grandchild the same amount, even the dead ones (unless they have no issue surviving). VERY similar to pre stripes except for where you make the cut
- UPC approach: but unpopular. First step: divide property into = shares in a generation has a surviving member. Eliminate the line of anyone who dies with no issue. Divide equally among first generation. If dead and has kids, hold that aside. Once living member og Get 1 get theirs, take ALL the $ left and divide equally among living grandkids.
What happens with wife’s kid born after husband dies?
If born within 280 days of death, rebuttable presumption it is husband’s kid and kid inherits normally. That’s the general rule–UPC says 300 days.
describe per stirpes inheritance
pre stirpes inheritance. Shares equal according to lineal line–total # of surviving kids and issue. The divide by representation. If issue survives parent, stand in parents’ place.
3 kids: B, C, D. All dead, survived by kids. Cut estate into 3 shares. Each of those 3 then gets divided among its kids.
describe per capita with representation way of dividing intestate inheritance
per capita with representation: make the first divide at a generation where one member survives. So if all 3 kids are dead, give each grandchild the same amount, even the dead ones (unless they have no issue surviving). VERY similar to pre stripes except for where you make the cut
describe the unpopular UPC approach to intestate inheritance division
UPC approach: but unpopular. First step: divide property into = shares in a generation has a surviving member. Eliminate the line of anyone who dies with no issue. Divide equally among first generation. If dead and has kids, hold that aside. Once living member og Get 1 get theirs, take ALL the $ left and divide equally among living grandkids.
3 requirements for making a valid will
- a signed (by testator) writing
- witnesses
- testamentary intent (intent to create a will)
How to make a signed writing in a will
Entire will must be written (typed too), signed by the testator
UPC does not permit oral wills, including audio or video recordings
Location of signature within document: some states require at end of document. Entire will is invalid if signed in wrong place.
UPC, other states: signature can be located on any part of the will. Test is intent of signer. Any words after signature do not have effect. IF YOU SEE A STRANGE signature NOTE THE LOCATION. We’ll let the will stand, but we’re worried about fraud so stuff later didn’t work
Ex: person signs will on p. 3 of 10 pages. some states: signature is void
Capacity: sound mind, adult, etc.
Formal signature: NOT required. must indicate testator’s intent and desire to make will. Nicknames (Hank) are OK
requirements for witness to a will–attestation
In the PRESENCE of at least 2 witnesses. Bar exam love PRESENCE.
Historically, all had to be in room together. but NOT NOW
mostly JDXs say Testator must sign or acknowledge will in presence of witnesses. They must sign in presence of tester
UPC is easier: just say within a reasonable time after Testator signs. Do NOT have to be in presence.
Old rule: must be in line of suight
New rule: “conscious presence” –when will is signed by another on behalf of testator.
- *Common law**: witness cannot have $ interest the will. Will can still be valid, but will “purge” any gain in excess of what that person would take in intestate succession.
- *UPC** has jettisoned the interested witness doctrine. Purging was too hard. Have to use fraud etc. procedures if there is FUNNY BUSINESS
What is the trend with UPC’s philosophy re: will-making
Old laws were harsh. UPC wants wills to be accessible to most people
what is a present testamentary intent
person must intend to make a will and this is it. Example: man writes up will, says he wants to sit on it for a week to think. NOT a will. Or man is told to sign doc he thinks is K but tis’ a will No present testamentary intent.
competency
at least 18
sound mind
competency measured at the time of signing
How strict do you need to comply with formalities to have a valid will
Common law AND majority rule: strict compliance with all the things
Minority view: UPC also: lse trending: substantial compliance with the formalities to make a will. IF there is C&C evidence that D meant this doc to be a will.
“Holographic” wills: informal, handwritten will
- need not be witnessed.
- must be signed to be valid
- UC: materials provisions must be testator handwriting
- must use language showing testamentary intent
- UPC encourages extrinsisch evidence if it hooks with intent.
How to make a codicil
Codicil supplements the underlying will. Must be:
- codicil must have same formalities as a will
- holographic codicil–we can do that,
- holo will can be amended by attested and vice versa
Will substitutes -avoid probate
- joint tenancy
- inter vivos trust
- payable-on-death contract (like a life insurance policy–not part of estate)
- deed. Inter vivos transfer
Wills: old and new rules for “in the presence”
Old rule: will must be signed in presence of testator/witness
New rule: CONSCIOUS PRESENCE:
UPC adopts Conscious Presence rule ONLY where will is signed by another on behalf of a testator (like if they can’t move)
can someone be a witness if they have a direct financial interest in the will? CL vs UPC
common law: interested witness is not competent to witness will. Does not void will, BUT:
“purge” theory: if a witness had a direct financial interest in will, anything they got beyond what they would get in intestate succession would be removed from the will
UPC: abolished interested witness doctrine. Made messy cases. Many interested witnesses are innocent.
Look out for funny business: look to other doctrines in wills law, like undue influence and fraud