Wills Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the CL exoneration of liens?

A

Under the common-law exoneration-of-liens doctrine, the recipient of a specific devise of real property can use the remaining assets in the testator’s estate to pay off any encumbrances on that property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a residuary clause in a will?

A

Devise of all property not disposed of by specific (my fur coat or my farm to A), general ($1000 to B, half my estate to my son), or demonstrative (evise primarily payable from designated source, but secondarily payable from general asset) devise. It can pass failed gifts from the will to another person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happens when a gift in a will fails and there is no designated residuary to catch all the random stuff in the will?

A

When there is no will or a will fails to address the disposition of the decedent’s real property, then the property will transfer to the decedent’s heir(s) by intestate succession or, if the decedent has no heirs, escheat to the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what the fuck is even a codicil

A

supplement that amends or revokes will in whole or in part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is probate

A

Figuring out the estate-settling claims against estate, figuring out who gets what

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what do you call a spouse in a will

A

MARITAL PARTNER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“issue” definition

A

decedant’s kids, their kids, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

collaterals re: a will

A

relatives through a common ancestor (sisters, cousins, aunts etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a person dies intestate, what rule decides who gets his stuff?

A

ONLY the state legislature’s rules. The dead guy’s desires or intent, if no will, don’t matter.
The HEIRS are those entitled to take a share if no will: generally, spouse and kids. Have to survive dead guy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the controlling laws systems in Wills?

A

Majority common law rule OR
Uniform Probate Code or UPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What if decedent and heir die at once? like car accident, no one knows who died first

A

Under UPC, heir must have survived by 120 hours, shown by C&C evidence
State have similar rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What sort of sexy partner is an heir?

A

MARRIED partner. Not common law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What amount can spouse take from estate, in various scenarios?

A
  1. Dead guy has surviving wife and kids, all from them both. Neither has other kids. Spouse takes ALL.
  2. Dead survived only by spouse and one parent . Spouse takes $300K and 75% of remaining estate. 25% to parent
  3. Dead guy survived by spouse, mutual kids, and spouse has previous kids. Spouse takes $225K and 50% remaining estate
  4. Dead guy survived by spouse and his previous kids. Spouse takes $150K and 50% remaining estate
  5. Dead guy does not have kids or parents, ONLY spouse. Spouse takes everything

Rule: always satisfy spouse first. Then kids.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When Dead dies intestate, what do his kids get?

A

[No distinction between bio and adoptive kids, but step-parent adoption does not prevent kid from inheriting from both dads]

DRAW THE FAMILY TREE

  1. pre stirpes inheritance. Shares equal according to lineal line–total # of surviving kids and issue. The divide by representation. If issue survives parent, stand in parents’ place.
    3 kids: B, C, D. All dead, survived by kids. Cut estate into 3 shares. Each of those 3 then gets divided among its kids.
  2. per capita with representation: make the first divide at a generation where one member survives. So if all 3 kids are dead, give each grandchild the same amount, even the dead ones (unless they have no issue surviving). VERY similar to pre stripes except for where you make the cut
  3. UPC approach: but unpopular. First step: divide property into = shares in a generation has a surviving member. Eliminate the line of anyone who dies with no issue. Divide equally among first generation. If dead and has kids, hold that aside. Once living member og Get 1 get theirs, take ALL the $ left and divide equally among living grandkids.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happens with wife’s kid born after husband dies?

A

If born within 280 days of death, rebuttable presumption it is husband’s kid and kid inherits normally. That’s the general rule–UPC says 300 days.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe per stirpes inheritance

A

pre stirpes inheritance. Shares equal according to lineal line–total # of surviving kids and issue. The divide by representation. If issue survives parent, stand in parents’ place.
3 kids: B, C, D. All dead, survived by kids. Cut estate into 3 shares. Each of those 3 then gets divided among its kids.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

describe per capita with representation way of dividing intestate inheritance

A

per capita with representation: make the first divide at a generation where one member survives. So if all 3 kids are dead, give each grandchild the same amount, even the dead ones (unless they have no issue surviving). VERY similar to pre stripes except for where you make the cut

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

describe the unpopular UPC approach to intestate inheritance division

A

UPC approach: but unpopular. First step: divide property into = shares in a generation has a surviving member. Eliminate the line of anyone who dies with no issue. Divide equally among first generation. If dead and has kids, hold that aside. Once living member og Get 1 get theirs, take ALL the $ left and divide equally among living grandkids.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

3 requirements for making a valid will

A
  1. a signed (by testator) writing
  2. witnesses
  3. testamentary intent (intent to create a will)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How to make a signed writing in a will

A

Entire will must be written (typed too), signed by the testator
UPC does not permit oral wills, including audio or video recordings

Location of signature within document: some states require at end of document. Entire will is invalid if signed in wrong place.
UPC, other states: signature can be located on any part of the will. Test is intent of signer. Any words after signature do not have effect. IF YOU SEE A STRANGE signature NOTE THE LOCATION. We’ll let the will stand, but we’re worried about fraud so stuff later didn’t work

Ex: person signs will on p. 3 of 10 pages. some states: signature is void

Capacity: sound mind, adult, etc.

Formal signature: NOT required. must indicate testator’s intent and desire to make will. Nicknames (Hank) are OK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

requirements for witness to a will–attestation

A

In the PRESENCE of at least 2 witnesses. Bar exam love PRESENCE.
Historically, all had to be in room together. but NOT NOW
mostly JDXs say Testator must sign or acknowledge will in presence of witnesses. They must sign in presence of tester
UPC is easier: just say within a reasonable time after Testator signs. Do NOT have to be in presence.

Old rule: must be in line of suight
New rule: “conscious presence” –when will is signed by another on behalf of testator.

  • *Common law**: witness cannot have $ interest the will. Will can still be valid, but will “purge” any gain in excess of what that person would take in intestate succession.
  • *UPC** has jettisoned the interested witness doctrine. Purging was too hard. Have to use fraud etc. procedures if there is FUNNY BUSINESS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the trend with UPC’s philosophy re: will-making

A

Old laws were harsh. UPC wants wills to be accessible to most people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is a present testamentary intent

A

person must intend to make a will and this is it. Example: man writes up will, says he wants to sit on it for a week to think. NOT a will. Or man is told to sign doc he thinks is K but tis’ a will No present testamentary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

competency

A

at least 18

sound mind

competency measured at the time of signing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How strict do you need to comply with formalities to have a valid will

A

Common law AND majority rule: strict compliance with all the things

Minority view: UPC also: lse trending: substantial compliance with the formalities to make a will. IF there is C&C evidence that D meant this doc to be a will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

“Holographic” wills: informal, handwritten will

A
  • need not be witnessed.
  • must be signed to be valid
  • UC: materials provisions must be testator handwriting
  • must use language showing testamentary intent
  • UPC encourages extrinsisch evidence if it hooks with intent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How to make a codicil

A

Codicil supplements the underlying will. Must be:

  1. codicil must have same formalities as a will
  2. holographic codicil–we can do that,
  3. holo will can be amended by attested and vice versa
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Will substitutes -avoid probate

A
  • joint tenancy
  • inter vivos trust
  • payable-on-death contract (like a life insurance policy–not part of estate)
  • deed. Inter vivos transfer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Wills: old and new rules for “in the presence”

A

Old rule: will must be signed in presence of testator/witness

New rule: CONSCIOUS PRESENCE:

UPC adopts Conscious Presence rule ONLY where will is signed by another on behalf of a testator (like if they can’t move)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

can someone be a witness if they have a direct financial interest in the will? CL vs UPC

A

common law: interested witness is not competent to witness will. Does not void will, BUT:

“purge” theory: if a witness had a direct financial interest in will, anything they got beyond what they would get in intestate succession would be removed from the will

UPC: abolished interested witness doctrine. Made messy cases. Many interested witnesses are innocent.

Look out for funny business: look to other doctrines in wills law, like undue influence and fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Will a modern court allow a will even if not all the formalities are complied with?

A

YES. under UPC, if will has substantial compliance with law and there is clear and convincing evidence of T’s intent, then will is OK. Example: everything is perfect but T forgot to sign. No evidence of problems.

32
Q

what is a holographic will? What must it involve to be valid?

A
  • MUST be signed
  • ANYTHING not in T’s handwriting is invalid

EXCEPT under UPC: only material provisions must be handwritten (makes form wills OK)

Must show testamentary intent. Say stuff like “bequeath”

33
Q

how old must a testator be for a valid will

A

18

34
Q

UPC rewuizemens for witness to a will

A
  • must be 2
  • need not be disinterested (meaning they can benefit from will)
  • must be able to see testator acknowledge either own signature or that this is her will
  • need NOT sign at same time as testator

-

35
Q

what is the purge theory for wills?

A

“purge” theory: if a witness had a direct financial interest in will, anything they got beyond what they would get in intestate succession would be removed from the will

Is NOT the law under the UPC–interested witnesses can sign will under UPC

36
Q

what steps must T take to revoke a will?

A

-can be revoked until T’s death, in whole or part

3 ways:

  1. subsequent instrument.
  2. physical act
  3. operation of law
37
Q

What does it mean that wills are ambulatory?

A

Ambulatory=Can be revoked at any time until T’s death. Later will generally overrules older will. Even if this is a last minute intense gift. Can be revoked in full or part

38
Q

how to revoke a will by instrument–2 ways

A
  1. Express revocation: document says “I hereby revoke previous will” and must be signed!! oral berating will not do it
  2. By implication through later document that is inconsistent: later correctly made will automatically revokes old will
39
Q

different between codicil and new will

A

easiest way: look for residuary gift. If has it, is likely a will. If not, is likely a codicil.

40
Q

how to revoke will by phsycial act

A

T must revoke a will totally or in part by:
tearing will up
burning will
angrily crossing things out in the will

UPC: says destructive act is enough, though maybe not tearing a tiny corner off will

41
Q

what happens with a will that existed w/ testator but is lost at time of death?

A

if will is lost: rebuttable presumption that T revoked it by physical act

to overcome, must show existence of will by C&C evidence

Duplicate original will work–signed at the time. Photocopy of the whole thing, no!!

42
Q

third way to revoke will: operate of law. explain

A

!. divorce revokes will. unless evidence that T wanted ex-spouse to take even after divorce. This invalidates gifts to ex-spouse and her relatives. Not a separation! Just divorce.

subsequent marriage does not revoke a will just because previous spouse will inreigit stuff

43
Q

3P revocation of will?

A

3P can revoke will on T’s behalf SO LONG AS

If you revoke and underlying will, also revokes codicil.

44
Q

revival of a revoked will–how does it work?

A

UPC does not automatically recognize revival of revoked will.

Revokig a second will des NOT revive first w ill. Will be distributed through intestate succession.

45
Q

DRR or Dependent Relative Revocation.

A

DRR invalidates mistaken revocation (I though my son was dead but he showed up!) and revoked will is revived.

safety valve for testators who revoke a will based on mistake:

If revocation was based on mistake, MUST talk about DRR on exam!

But for the mistake, T would not have revoked first will.

46
Q

if you make a will, then revoke it expressly in Will 2, then what happens to W1 if you revoke Will 2?

A

UPC AND MAJORITY: NO automatic revival of Will 1. Would have to re-execute Will 1.

There is no will, person dies intestate

(picky rules here, may or may not appear on bar exam)

47
Q

dominant doctrine to construct terms in a will

A

claim meaning doctrine: the plain meaning of the words in the text controls regardless of intent

UNLESS will says inside it that “X means Y” and it’s not the plain meaning

48
Q

How to incorporate an extrinsic doc into a will by reference

A

If extrinsic doc is not a will but wants to incorporate it by reference, it can IF:

  1. doc exists
  2. intent to incorporate it into will
  3. doc is described
49
Q

what happens if devisee Bob dies before testator?

A

Bob’s stuff in the will LAPSES and his stuff is dumped into residue–for residuary

Anti-lapse statute: some states have laws to prevent gifts to relatives from lapsing:

  1. protected familial relationship
  2. giftee dies before will-maker
  3. gift family member survived by issue
  4. then issue gets the gift
50
Q

What is LAPSE in a will

A

gift fails and goes to residual, unless family member of part of a class getting a class gift

51
Q

define abatement in a will

A

If an estate does not have enough funds to make the gifts, these are the most protected to lessdy yo be abated:

  1. specific gifts (my favorite teddy bear)
  2. general gifts ($10,000)
  3. demonstrative gift–general gift from particular source ($100 from my betting slip box)
    1. legacies treated as specific gifts if they can be satisfied, treated as general if not
  4. residuary gift–you get everything not given elsewhere
52
Q

ademption: define.2 doctrines

A

ademption by extinction: if will makes devise of specific piece of property (horse Anna) but it is not there any more (was stolen)

traditional approach: gift is extinct, out of luck

UPC says: intent theory. Look @ T’s intent at the time she make gift in will. Did intend will

ademption by satisfaction: when T satisfies specific or demonstrative gift by Inter vivos transfer. T must intend that the gift deem the gift in the will and must write down!!!

53
Q

ambiguities in a will: 2 types and how we can resolve them

A

latent ambiguities in a will. Language appears fine, but is a problem once you know context “I give $10 to my brother.” Problem: has 2 brothers.

patent ambiguities: obvious in the test itself: 2 different addresses listed as same gift

Old rule: latent can be resolved by extrinsic evidence, patent cannot use extrinsic evidence. (Adam needed $10 and Bob is rich)

New rule: can use extrinsic evidence for both

54
Q

what are the limits on testator’s power to transfer property in a will? 3 categories

A
  1. spouses’ rights –entitled to means of support
    1. social security, pension
    2. homestead exemption–keep the house
    3. personal property set-asides
    4. family allowance: in probate process, make sure income is coming
    5. Elective share: (bad name) spouse can take 50% of augmented
  2. gifts to T’s children re:inrestate share. This is a lifetime gift of intestate property (as opposed to ademption by satisfaction, which is when kid gets something that is in the testament, not intestate)
    1. Old rule: any gift to kid is assumed to be an adavaceent on their intestate share unless they show otherwise
    2. UPC: gift is an advancement if T did in writing that gift was and advancement, OR kid anckonwldege it was advancement, OR T acknowledged in writing that it would be taken out of inheritance
  3. Unintentionally disinherited children. (ex: stuff given out in the will to older children, but didn’t )
    1. if testator did not have any child when will executed, omitted child takes her intestate share
    2. if testator gave $ to one living child and then had another, the second omitted child evenly splits $ with sibling who got it
  4. SLAYER RULE
    1. public policy: if you murder someone you can’t inherit their stuff.
      1. have not applied in voluntary manslaughter or similar Must be murder
      2. UPC says the murderer’s kids can still inherit
  5. Disclaimer: I don’t want it! (taxes)
    1. must be in signed writing filed to court OR
    2. declared to person distributing to estate, ID deddenat, describe interest being disclaimed and extent of discliamer
    3. MUST SO within 9m
  6. Elder abuse: can’t inherit convicted of financial abuse, neglect etc. of elder in her care.
55
Q

how does an elective share in a will situation work?

A
  1. Elective share AKA forced share. protects spouse: gets to take big chunk off top of estate even if it messes w/ other gifts. This is in addition to getting the house, pension etc. This is in non-community-property JDXs.
  2. Waiver must be:
    1. IN WRITING,
    2. after fair disclosure of contents of share,
    3. spouse must be represented by independent legal counsel.
  3. What is the amount?
    1. UPC: 50% of augmented estate (property acquired before and during marriage. Broader than community property in divorce!)
56
Q

How are gifts during life to a testator’s children calculated in their intestate inheritance?

A

Re: a lifetime gift of intestate property ADVANCEMENT

  1. Old rule: any gift to kid is assumed to be an adavaceent on their intestate share unless they show otherwise
  2. UPC: gift is an advancement IF
    1. T did in contemporaneous writing that gift was an advancement, OR
    2. kid anckonwldeged in writing it was advancement, OR
    3. T acknowledged in writing that it would taken into account when calculating decedent’s estate

HOW TO CALCULATE

  1. Calculate value of advancement
  2. Add it (or them) back in to the estate
  3. Divide by # of children inheriting
  4. Deduct each child’s advancement from their share

(as opposed to ademption by satisfaction, which is when kid gets something that is in the testament, not intestate)

57
Q

how to disclaim (refuse with legal effect) a gift in a will or an inheritance

A
  1. Disclaimer
    1. must be in signed writing filed to court OR
    2. declared to person distributing to estate, ID deddenat, describe interest being disclaimed and extent of discliamer
    3. MUST DO within 9m
58
Q

who has standing to contest a will?

A

Any interested party–has financial benefit in will

OR

someone who would take under intestate succession

59
Q

how long to file a contest to a will

A

6 months after probate begins

60
Q

contesting a will according to T’s capacity: elements

A
  1. capacity: age and sound mind
    1. contestant bears burden that testator lacked capacity at time of execution of will
      1. ability to know (not actual knowledge)
        1. nature of the act
        2. what: nature of her property
        3. who: the natural objects of bounty
        4. plan of attempted dispositionD
      2. Insane delusion
        1. measure against rational person in T’s position could not have reached same conclusion
        2. insane delusion was a but-for cause of the will being a certain way
61
Q

3 grounds to contest a will

A
  1. testator’s capacity (mental ability to know the nature of what you’re doing, or insane delusion)
  2. undue influence
  3. Fraud in the execution or the inducement
62
Q

contesting will due to undue influence: 4 elements and remedy

A

Contestatn must show first, initial burden:

  1. Grima got substantial benefit in will
  2. Confidential relationship (often professional or familial)
  3. T had weakened intellect at the time
  4. Causation: Griam’s behavior to his gift

Then, if proved the 3 above, burden shifts to Grima to show by preponderance of evidence that there was no undue influence
5. If they fail, Grima is treated as predeceasing testator to extent gift in excess of intestate share.

63
Q

contesting will due to fraud/misrepresentation: elements

A
  1. made misrep with purpose to deceive testator and influence will
  2. fraud in the inducement: misrep causes T to make will differently (promises to share it with Eowyn, won’t)
  3. fraud in the execution: misrep re: character or contents of will, like if T doesn’t read it and Grima lies to him

REMEDY: constructive trust (most common remedial trust)

64
Q

forfeiture clauses

A

forfeiture or inter arum clause–designed to stop beneficiary from suing over share. May not be enforceable:

clause is unenforceable if beneficiary had probable cause to challenge the will

forfeiture clause IS enforceable if had PC

65
Q

way to spot undue influence/fraud problems with will vs insane delusion

A

undue influence and fraud require 3P, insane delusion does not

66
Q

describe fraud in the inducement vs in the execution re: a will

A

inducement means you lie to T about something to get him to make the will differently than it would be otherwise

execution means you lie to T about what’s in the will to get him to sign it w/out reading

67
Q

probate property vs nonpraobte property

A

probate: passes by will or intestate succession

non-probate: passes by other means, like deeds, trusts

68
Q

what triggers property distribution by intestate succession rules?

A

if decedent does not have will, it’s invalid, or it does not cover all property

69
Q

order of settling property:

A
  1. distribute the non-probate stuff first
  2. then probate: do stuff in the will
  3. then intestate succession (any property not specifically devised goes to intestate succession)

WHERE ARE CREDITORS??

70
Q

what does probate court do?

A

watches out for undue influence, interest of T

handles contests

satisfies creditors

deals with title

71
Q

how long to do probate?

A

UPC probate proceedings must be brought within 3y of death,

can ask informal, ex party, or formal proceedings

creditors can’t make claim on estate after certain time period or claim is barred, time based on statute

72
Q

in probate–hierarchy of claims

A
  1. creditors first
  2. expenses
  3. medical and funeral
  4. kids and spouses support
  5. taxes
  6. secured claims
  7. judgments against decedent
  8. everything else
73
Q

duties of representative of testator

A
  1. inventor property
  2. locate people with claims on estate
  3. satisfied debts
  4. pay taxes

DUTIES OWED from executor or personal rep:

fiduciary: owe royalty and care, cannot engage in self dealing
estate pays personal rep

74
Q

who can be personal rep to probate will, if not named in will?

A

HIERARCHY:

surviving spouse devisee

other surviving devisee

if not devisee, surviving spouse

then other heir

45d after death, any creditor

75
Q

Power of appointment–howo it works

A

GENERAL. Donee has general power to appoint owner of property–no restrictions. Herself, creditor, whoever

SPECIAL. Donee has special power to appoint owner of property–limited power. T gives power of appointment to Hank on condition that neither Hank or his family can take property. Or on condition to give out to his nieces and nephews.

76
Q

what is power of attorney and what 3 kinds are relevant to wills

A

Power of attorney is ability to act on other’s behalf in legal or business matter

writing, signed, DATED

Kinds of power of attorney:
1. general. All affairs during incapacitation.
2. special: limited to subject matter
3. advanced health care directives.
Living will. Agent’s job is to ensure wishes are enforced.
Durable power of atty: make all decisions.

77
Q

If a donee of a general power of appointment fails to exercise that power, what happens to the decedent’s property?

A

The property reverts back to the donor’s estate.