Wills Flashcards
Valid will requirements
- Legal capacity (e.g., 18 years old and of sound mind)
- Testamentary capacity (e.g., ability to understand the nature of their act; nature and extent of their property; natural objects of their bounty; etc.)
- Testamentary intent (e.g., intent to dispose of property through will)
- In a signed writing with two present witnesses
Competency of witnesses
Interested witnesses (i.e., beneficiary) not competent
Holographic will
Must be entirely in testator’s writing and does not need attesting witnesses. Typewritten text is generally ok as long as the terms are not material
Classification of property
Specific devise (‘I leave my computer with 123 serial number’)
General devise (‘I leave my computer’)
Residuary estate is left over after paying debts and other gifts
Ademption by Extinction
The failure of a gift because the property is no longer in the estate at the time of testator’s death. Some states allow the devisee to take replacement property
Ademption by satisfaction
Testamentary gift may be satisfied if testator intends
Under the UPC, the doctrine is N/A unless provided for in the will/acknowledged by the devisee in writing
Exoneration
Liens on the property are not paid off with estate funds unless the will explicitly states
Abatement
Reduction of gifts when the estate assets are not enough to pay the claims against the estate and satisfy all bequests
- Intestacy
- Residuary estate
- General bequests
- Demonstrative bequests
- Specific bequests
Lapsed gifts
Beneficiary predecessors testator
Anti-Lapse Statutes
Saves gifts from lapsing if the deceased beneficiary has descendants
Basic rules of construction
- If there is a will, avoid intestacy
- In situations with two contradictory provisions, the last one prevails
- Will is construed as a whole
- Ordinary meaning of words
Patent vs. latent ambiguities
Patent ambiguity is ambiguous on its face, but the modern rules allow for the use of extrinsic evidence.
Latent ambiguities arise with clear terms that can’t be carried out without further clarification. Courts can and will consider extrinsic evidence.
Mistakes in wills
States following the plain meaning rule bar the use of extrinsic evidence that disturbs the plain meaning of the will.
The modern approach is to allow extrinsic evidence in situations where a mistake is challenged.
Incorporation by Reference
- Will manifests an intent to incorporate
- The document is in existence when the will is executed
- The document is sufficiently described in the will
Codicils
Codicils modify wills but must be executed with the same formalities.
Changes to wills must be re-executed or are otherwise ineffective.