Wills Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Share of the Surviving Spouse

A

If the decedent is married, the spouse will get everything if the decedent’s parents are deceased and if the decedent did not have children outside of their relationship.

If the decedent’s parents survive the decedent the parents will receive a portion of the estate and the spouse will receive the rest.

If the decedent has children that are not children in common with the spouse, the children will receive a significant portion of the estate. The spouse will receive the rest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Adopted Children

A

At CL, only blood relations could inherit from an intestate decedent. However, modernly, all states grant adoptive children inheritance rights.

An adopted child generally does not receive an inheritance from the biological parent.

However, if a step-parent adopts a child, the child may inherit from both their biological parents and the and step-parent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Inheritance of Children Born Out of Wedlock

A

At CL, a non-marital child could not inherit from either parent.

Today, all states grant such children the right to inherit from their mothers and to inherit from their fathers when at least one statutorily defined method of establishing paternity has been satisfied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is paternity usually established for inheritance purposes?

A

Paternity usually established through

  1. Evidence of subsequent marriage of parents
  2. acknowledgment by father
  3. adjudication during life of father
  4. other clear and convincing evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Share of Children - Per Capita at Each Generation

(all about fairness)

A

If the decedent’s spouse and parents do not survive the testator, there are schemes to divide property among the decedent’s children. Under the “per capita at each generation” model, the basic number of shares is determined in the following way:

First, one must identify the first generation where there are issue (children) living.

Second, one share is given for each living issue and one share for each person in that generation who died before the decedent but left issue surviving. If a person died and did not leave any issue, their line is extinct and is not taken into account.

Third, all shares of the deceased persons are then combined into a single share and distributed equally at the next generation level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Share of Children - Per Capita w/ Representation (“Modern Per Stirpes”)

A

If the decedent’s spouse and parents do not survive the testator, there are schemes to divide property among the decedent’s children. Under the “per capita with representation” or “modern per stirpes” model, the basic number of shares is determined in the following way:

First, one must identify the first generation where there are issue (children) living.

Second, one share is given for each living issue and one share for each person in that generation who died before the decedent but left the issue surviving. If a person died and did not leave any issue, their line is extinct and is not taken into account.

Third, each deceased person’s share is passed on to their issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Validity of a Will

A

A will is valid if specific state formalities are followed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. In a writing
  2. Signed by testator or proxy
  3. With the present testamentary intent that doc is is will
  4. Signed/witnessed by at least two witnesses in T’s presence in a reasonable time

Many also require testator be 18+

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does a will have to be in writing?

A

Yes. Will must be in writing.

Oral Wills are not recognized under the UPC or in most states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What counts as a signature on a will?

A

Anything intended to be signature qualifies (nicknames, X, etc.)

UPC - T may sign anywhere on document and whole Will will be valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

UPC/Majority Standard

Signatures

A

Conscious Presence of Signature aka w/in range of Testator’s senses, not necessarily in line of sight (just so long as can see and hear)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Minority Signature

A

Line of Sight - proxy sig only valid if T can see proxy signer and witnesses sign will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Testamentary Intent

Testator __________ intended to (1) make a ___________ of property that (2) would be _____________ by the ______________ in question and (3) become _________ upon Testator’s ______.

This is usually established by provisions in the will (“I, Testator X, hereby declare that this is my last will”)

______________ evidence is allowed to prove requisite intent or lack thereof.

A

Testamentary Intent

Testator presently intended to (1) make a disposition of property that (2) would be governed by the instrument in question and (3) become effective upon Testator’s death.

This is usually established by provisions in the will (“I, Testator X, hereby declare that this is my last will”)

Extrinsic evidence is allowed to prove requisite intent or lack thereof.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interested Witnesses

(those who receive property under a will)

CL

A

Will = invalid if Ws are not disinterested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Interested Witnesses

(those who receive property under a will)

Modern

A

Will still valid but some states say can’t take bequest.

Exceptions:

(a) will witnessed by 3+ Ws and would have been valid w/o interested W
(b) will republished by codicil + disinterested W witnessed codicil;
(c) if interested W also heir, would forfeit only so much as bequest exceeds what intestate share would have been

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Interested Witnesses

(those who receive property under a will)

UPC

A

Disinterested Ws do not invalidate will or any provision of it under UPC.

Can take bequest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What’s a holographic will?

A

Unwitnessed wills

Valid Under UPC if:

(1) Testator signs will; AND
(2) Material portions are in testator’s handwriting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When state requires that a will be subscribed/published, what does that mean?

A

T must sign @ end of will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Integration

A

Doctrine that permits separate papers to become a single will

Elements (UPC):

(1) Physical Presence - Pages physically present at the time when T and Ws signed the last pg of will

AND (2) Intent of Inclusion - Intended to be Part of the Will via

(a) Physical Connection (aka staples)

OR

(b) Logical Connection (aka Internal Coherence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a Codicil?

A

A supplement to a will the modifies it, adds to it, explains it, or revokes it. Generally, a codicil must be executed in compliance with will formalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

If a codicil republishes the will to which it refers…

A

The original will is treated as if it was written on the date the codicil was executed

Republictioncan cure defects that might otherwise affect the validity of bequests made under the will. However, most states say that a document that is not a valid will to begin with cannot be republished by codicil.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

To the extent that the codicil is inconsistent with the will, which controls?

A

The Codicil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What happens to a codicil when a will is revoked? What happens to a will when a codicil is revoked?

A

Revoking a will revokes all codicils. But revoking a codicil does not revoke a will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Incorporation by Reference

A

A writing that is not valid as a will,

but is in existence when a will is executed

may be incorporated by reference into the will

if the will manifests an intent to incorporate the writing and

the _writing to be incorporated is identified w/ reasonable certai_nty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Disclaimer

One may disclaim an interest that otherwise would pass to them from a decedent to a decedent’s estate

Requirements: must be (1) __________, (2) ______________, and (3) filed w/in __ months of D’s death

Effect = ______________________________

A

Disclaimer

One may disclaim an interest that otherwise would pass to them from a decedent to a decedent’s estate

Requirements: must be (1) in writing, (2) irrevocable, and (3) filed w/in 9 months of D’s death

Effect = interest passses as if disclaiming party predeceased D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Simultaneous Death Statute

An heir or beneficiary must be alive at the time of the testator’s death. Under the revised Uniform Simultaneous Death Act (USDA), an individual who is not established by ________ and ___________ evidence to have survived the decedent by ____ hours is deemed to have __________ the decedent and cannot _________

A

Simultaneous Death Statute

An heir or beneficiary must be alive at the time of the testator’s death. Under the revised Uniform Simultaneous Death Act (USDA), an individual who is not established by clear and convincing evidence to have survived the decedent by 120 hours is deemed to have predeceased the decedent and cannot take as an heir

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Acts of Independent Significance

A

A will may provide for the designation of a beneficiary or the amount of a disposition by reference to some future unattested act occurring after execution of the will

Valid so long as act or event has some independent significance other than providing gift in will

e.g., Identification of a beneficiary or property or amount of a gift in will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Contractual Wills

A
  • Ordinarily, Ks to make a will must be made in writing (some states use SoF)
  • UPC → existence of joint will does not by itself establish K between two testators to dispose of their property in a certain way. K to make a will may be est by (1) provisions of a will stating material portions of K; (2) an express reference in a will to a K and extrinsic evidence proving the terms; or (3) a writing signed by the decedent evidencing a K
  • Execution of mutual wills does not create a presumption of a K not to revoke the will/wills

Effect of K will = if 2 Ts have executed contractual wills, either may revoke the will during their joint lifetimes if notice given to other person. UPC doesn’t have a provision regarding the revocation of will, so if revoking testator dies first, all survivng testator can do is change their own will moving forward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Conditional Wills:

A

Go into effect when a certain act or conditions happen

Death of testator is not a “condition” in this sense

Probated only of conditions are satisfied

Can be a formal or holographic will

Most courts will really want to look at express language in the will b/c if language makes clearly conditional, won’t probate. If unclear, crt usually probates (interpretation = dangerous event simply motivated testator to make the will)

*Pay attn to facts to see if something cry could probate - Didn’t destroy will after surviving whatever they feared would happen; Only will that’s there, otherwise intestate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How does the UPC handle incorporation by reference?

A

UPC → tangible personal property list. Signed memo w/ list of assets. Flexibility w/ timing. Doc does not have to exist @ time of will and can be created, modified thereafter. Can’t use to dispose of money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Revocation of Will

Any testator with ________ can revoke their will in _______ or in _______ by _________ will or by _________ act at any time prior to ___________

A

Any testator with capacity can revoke their will in whole or in part by subsequent will or by revocatory act at any time prior to death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is dependent relative revocation?

A

A first will is not revoked if a later will is found invalid.

If T revokes a will or bequest based on mistaken assumption of law or fact, revocation of will is ineffective if it appears the T would not have revoked the bequest has he had accurate info.

Court disregards a revocation that was done to create an alternative disposition to the OG will, but was based on a mistake of fact or law (e.g. didn’t follow will reqs). Court will apply DRR and revive revoked will if doing so would come closer to giving the effect to what T tried, but failed, to do than would intestate succession.

e.g. T drafts will that leaves $20k to sister. Later, crosses out $20k and leaves $40k (which was invalid b/c not witnessed or signed by T). Clearly not T’s intent to leave sister w/ nothing, so $20k stands. However, if T drafts will leaving bookcase and crosses out and says motorcycle, sister left with nothing b/c crt probs can’t apply dependent relative revocation b/c lack of sufficiently close identity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Revocation by Physical Act

A

A testator may revoke their will or a part of it by performing a revocatory act w/ the simultaneous intent to revoke all or part of it.

This can be done by another person in the Testator’s conscious presence & by Testator’s direction. The burden of proof is on the person trying to establish that will was revoked to prove it was revoked.

If T made several copies, revoking 1 revokes all

CL → words of cancellation had to “touch” the words of the will

UPC/Most States → CL rule doesn’t apply (e.g. could write “I no longer want this to be my will” on back of will)

Partial Revocation by Physical Act: Most states and the UPC specifically authorize partial revocation by physical act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Physical Acts that Cause Revocation Include…

A

Destroying

Burning

Tearing

Obliterating

Cancellation

Interlineation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Revocation due to Changed Circumstances

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Presumption of Revocation

A

If will in T’s possession and ctrl but not found after death or found mutilated after death, some jdxns say there is a rebuttable presumption that will was revoked that can be rebutted by evidence that indicates otherwise

37
Q

Partial Revocation

A

Most states and the UPC specifically authorize partial revocation by physical act

Can occur when there is a valid subsequent instrument that revokes only certain bequests but not the whole will

When a will is found w/ marks of cancellation, a rebuttable presumption arises that such marks were made by the testator w/ intent to revoke.

38
Q

When does the concept of revival come into play?

A

Testator executes will 1, then executes will 2, which revokes will 1. Testator then revokes will 2 by physical act

39
Q

Common Law Revival

A

Revocation of second will revives first will.

Exception = not revived if T’s statements or other ev make clear T did not intend to revive prior will

40
Q

Majority Rule - Revival

A

Revocation of second will does not revive first will (one must re-execute first will)

41
Q

Revival - Some States/UPC

A

Revocation of second will does not revive the earlier will unless evident that the testator intended the previous will to take effect as executed.

42
Q

Re-Execution of Will

A

A revoked will may be re-executed by a subsequent will or codicil if testamentary formalities are satisfied

43
Q

When does a will take effect?

A

A will “speaks at death”

-will read at death and meaning is given to words then

44
Q

What happens to a gift if beneficiary is deceased?

A

One cannot give a gift to a dead person. If a beneficiary does not survive the T, the gift to the beneficiary will “lapse” or fail and fall into the residuary of the estate

45
Q

What’s an anti-lapse statute?

A

All states have these.

-Default = if a beneficiary dies before T and was both related by blood to the T w/in a certain degree of relationship and had issue who survived the T, deceased beneficiary is “saved” from lapse and beneficiary’s issue will take in lieu of deceased beneficiary. It won’t save a gift to a spouse in most states.

Statute will not apply if will instructs otherwise-crt will look @ testator’s intent to determine whether to apply statute.

46
Q

How does the UPC handle anti-lapse statutes?

A

Survivorship language (“if he survives me”) not enough to override the application of anti-lapse statute. Courts need more evidence of clear intent

47
Q

Failure of a Residuary Bequest

When residuary bequest fails, does the invalidated share pass to T’s heirs or to the remaining residuary legatees?

A

CL → invalid share passes to T’s heirs via intestacy

UPC/modern → give any failed gift to residuary

48
Q

Anti-Lapse Statutes and Class Gifts

A

Class Gifts → if will makes gift to class and a class member predeceases T, surviving class members take predeceased’s gift absent alternative provision in will.

— BUT If anti-lapse statute applies to the predeceasing class member (was relative + has issue), gift vests in predeceased’s descendants, not the class.

49
Q

What’s addemption? When does “ademption” come into play?

A

Addemption = reduction

Comes into play when gift fails because property no longer exists in T’s estate @ death

  • Only applies to specific gifts that are satisfied only by giving the actual described property
  • Some states will allow for sub property if beneficiary proves T intended them to receive it
  • Not applicable to general devise (gift of dollar amount payable from estate’s assets) or demonstrative devise(gen amnt IDing some asset as a source of payment [e.g., stock]).
  • When gen gift fails, estate generally must sell off other prop to satisfy the gift.
50
Q

Ademption: Unpaid Insurance Proceeds

A

If prop destroyed by fire or lost by theft and insurance proceeds are paid to executor of estate after death of testator, some crts hold that those insurance proceeds should be paid to the beneficiary as a substitute for the specifically devised property (also applies to condemnation awards after death)

51
Q

Ademption - Conservator Gifts

A

There is no ademption if the conservator, acting on behalf of legally incompetant person, sells an asset that is the subject matter of a specific bequest in the incompetent person’s will

52
Q

Intent Theory of Ademption and Effect

A

In some states, adeemed gifts may be saved if evidence establishes that ademption would be inconsistent w/ testator’s intent

Effect → beneficiary gets monetary value of that specific bequest or gets property that was acquired as a replacement for the adeemed gift.

53
Q

Accretions

A

Increase in value (usually due to stock splits)

CL → a beneficiary who is given common stock was entitled to additional shares of that stock obtained by T through a stock split , but not to additional shares acquired as a stock dividend

Modern → all jdxns treat stock splits and dividends the same way

54
Q

CL Exoneration

A

Under CL, if there was a mortgage on real prop bequeathed to a person, that person was entitled to have the mortgage paid from the estate as a debt of the decedent unless there was evidence of contrary intent on the part of the testator

55
Q

Majority/UPC Exoneration

A

Majority/UPC → beneficiary of an encumbered property takes it subject to the mortgage. Gurther, general directives to “pay all debts” is not enough to show intent to exonerate the devisee of specifically devised property

56
Q

Slayer Statute & Standard

A

An individual who feloniously and intentionally kills or is convicted of committing abuse, neglect, or exploitation with respect to the decedent forfeits all benefits with respect to the decedent’s estate

Standard = preponderance of evidence (NOT BARD)

57
Q

Slayer Statute Exceptions

A

If an individual accidentally kills decedent, slayer statute doesn’t bar gift

If slayer murdered someone other than decedent, slayer statute doesn’t apply.

If decedent executed instrument after date of conviction expressing a specific intent to allow felon to inherit/receive prop, slayer doesn’t apply.

58
Q

WTF is Abatement?

A

When the assets of an estate are insufficient to give all of the gifts under someone’s will, then the gifts to the beneficiaries will have to be reduced (or abated).

-Abatement in each each category is pro rata

Steps: (1) classify; (2) abate (reduce) them in order equally

59
Q

Classify and Order Testamentary Bequests for Abatement

A

Testamentary bequests abate in the following order

  1. Intestate property (property not disposed of in the will)
  2. Residuary gifts (“all the rest and residue of my estate goes to…”)
  3. General gifts (gift of fixed dollar amount)
  4. Demonstrative gifts (gifts of fixed dollar amount with specific instructions or from particular fund)
  5. Specific gifts (identifiable property; e.g. “my ring”)
60
Q

How were Class Gifts handles under the CL?

A

Gift to class implied a survivorship condition w/ result that only those members who survived testator shared in gift

61
Q

How does the UPC handle class gifts?

A

Gift will not lapse if beneficiary is related to the testator and leaves issue. Instead, gift will go to the issue unless T expressly states that an anti-lapse statute shouldn’t apply

62
Q

What are class gifts?

A

Gifts given to unnamed people

63
Q

Standing to Contest a Will

A

Wills can only be contested by persons who have a pecuiniary interest

Beneficiaries, someone who should be beneficiary

Someone who would be better off financially if the will were denied probate than they would be if the will were admitted to probate.

e.g. daughter of T could challenge but T’s grandchild (child of daughter) couldn’t b/c child always takes to the exclusion of her own descendents

64
Q

Reasons to Contest a Will

A
  1. Age Requirement
  2. Testamentary Intent
  3. Mental Capacity/Insane Delusion
  4. Undue Influence
  5. Fraud
  6. Mistake
65
Q

What’s a no-contest clause?

A

A clause that states that if someone contests the will, that person will not take under it

66
Q

Are no-constest clauses enforceable?

A

UPC/Most States → clause enforceable unless PC exists for challenging a will (PC defined objectively – good faith belief not enough if no reas basis for it, but reliance on the advice of counsel suffices if it was sought in good faith after full disclosure of facts)

Minority → no-contest clause = invalid as a matter of public policy

67
Q

Undue Influence

If the wrongdoer exerted such influence over the donor that it ______________________ and caused donor to ____________________________

Elements:

(1) S_______________________________
(2) O________________________
(3) D___________________________
(4) A__________________________________________

A

Undue Influence

If the wrongdoer exerted such influence over the donor that it overcame donor’s free will and caused donor to make a donative transfer that she would not have otherwise made

Elements:

(1) Susceptible Testator (Financial, Physical, Psychological, etc.)
(2) Opportunity to Influence
(3) Disposition or Motive to Exert Influence
(4) Appears to be a product of undue influence (e.g., person with no relationship w/ testator takes under will)

68
Q

When is there a Presumption of Undue Influence?

A

(1) If person in confidential relationship w/ testator actively participates in procuring a will in that person’s favor and
(2) Suspicious circumstances surround the drafting of the will

Effect: Only part of Will affect is invalid

Applies to the following relationships:

Attorney-Client

Doctor-Patient

Guardian-Ward

Trustee-Beneficiary

Member of Clergy

Husband & Wife = NO Confidential Relationship

69
Q

Fraud Elements

A
  1. Misrepresentation of Material Fact to the Testator
  2. Known to be False by the Wrongdoer when made
  3. For the Purpose of Inducing Action or Omission
  4. Actually Induces Action or Omission
70
Q

What is Fraud in the Execution?

A

(a) Forging signature or
(b) Testator signs document under belief that it is non-testamentary in nature = Entire Will is INVALID

Effect: Intestate Succession Unless Prior Valid Will

71
Q

What is Fraud in the Inducement?

A

Wrongdoer’s Misrepresentation of Material fact affects contents of will = only part of will INVALID

Effect: Residuary Clause, Intestate Succession, or Constructive Trust

72
Q

Duress

A

If the wrongdoer threatened to perform or did perform a wrongful act that coerced the donor into making a donative transfer that she would not have otherwise made

73
Q

Mistake as to Nature of Instrument/Execution

A

Extrinsic evidence may be permitted to show that testator was mistaken as to the nature of the instrument signed (e.g. didn’t know he was signing his will).

Mistake may nullify the testamentary intent requirement

74
Q

Mistake in Inducement

A

No relief available if a mistake relates to the reason testator made a will or made (or didn’t make) a gift in the will.

Relief may be available if there is a separate ground for contesting the will (e.g. fraud, undue influence)

75
Q

Mistaken Ommission

A

No relief is available and no extrinsic evidence is admissible to show that a will mistakenly ommitted a provision or contains provisions that do not reflect testator’s intent

Relief may be available if there is a separate ground for contesting the will (e.g., fraud, undue influence, etc.)

76
Q

UPC Reformation for a Mistake

A

UPC allows a court to reform terms of a will to conform to testator’s intent

Must be show by clear and convincing evidence that a mistake of law or fact affected the will and testator’s intent

77
Q

Non-Probate Transfers

A

These are gifts transferred outside of the will (usually inter vivos gifts, or gifts that pass automatically on death regardless of any provisions in a will)

78
Q

Non-Probate Transfers - Inter Vivos Gifts

A

A gift given by a living person to another living person.

Requirements: (1) present intent to give a gift; (2) delivery (crts require physical delivery but will allow constructive delivery if gift cannot physically be delivered to the donee at the time donor wishes to complete the gift); and (3) acceptance (presumed if gift is of value)

Once an inter vivos gift is made, it cannot be revoked

79
Q

Non-Probate Transfer - Joint Tenant Bank Account

A

A surviving joint tenant is generally entitled to money in a jointly-held account when the other joint tenant dies.

Usually arises where account is in the name of 2+ people w/ the “right of survivorship”

CANNOT be revoked by will

80
Q

Non-Probate Transfer - Totten Trust

A
81
Q

Non-Probate Transfer - Life Insurance

A

K made between policyholder and insurance company under which beneficiary is named. Unless K provides otherwise, policyholder cannot change the beneficiary through a provision in their will.

82
Q

Pretermitted child

A

A pretermitted child is one that is not named in the will because the child was born after the will was written. Many states have ”pretermitted child” statutes aimed at ensuring that children born after the execution of a will aren not inadvertently disinherited. This does not protect children born before the will is executed.

If a testator had no children when executing the will - the child generally receives an intestate share.

If T had children when executing will - pretermitted child is entitled to share in the gift of the other then-living children

83
Q

Spouse’s Forced or Elective Shares

A

If a surviving spouse doesn’t like what they are given in a will (e.g., doesn’t include, gives minimal assets), they can “elect against” the will.

If she elects against the will, she will receive her “elective share,” which is a fraction of the estate–usually about ⅓ or ½ of the “augmented” estate.

Not automatic → must be made w/in 6 months

UPC → bases share, in part, on how long couple has been married

84
Q

Assets Subject to share under augmented estate

A

UPC/some states will take into account:

  • Decedent’s net probate estate (does not include property given to a trust)
  • Decedent’s nonprobate transfers to others besides the surviving spouse
  • Decedent’s nonprobate transfers to the surviving spouse
  • Surviving spouse’s property and nonprobate transfers to others
85
Q

Spouse’s Waiver of Elected Share

A

A spouse can waive the right of election by prenuptial agreement so long as there was full disclosure of assets. However, a prenup waiving rights a spouse might have does not preclude a surviving spouse form taking a gft that was voluntarily devised by the deceased’s spouse

86
Q

Living Will

A

A written statement that describes an adult’s desires regarding their medical treatment in circumstances where they are no longer able to express informed consent. It generally specifies life-sustaining and pain-alleviating measures.

87
Q

Durable healthcare power of attorney

A

Principal appoints an agent to make healthcare decisions on their behalf

  • Becomes effective only if principal is incapacitated
  • Extends to all healthcare questions unless otherwise limited
  • If no durable power of attorney, then most states allow close relatives to act as surrogate decision-makers

Generally, agent must act in good faith in following the instructions in the document and they are typically immunized from civil liability for healthcare decisions made in good faith.

88
Q

CONFLICTS

Which law governs the distribution of property?

Personal Property?

Real Property?

A

Personal prop → where decedent was domiciled @ death

Real Property → where the property is (law of the situs)