will contests Flashcards
will contest
- contestant is challenging probate
- must be made within 2 years of opening probate
- claimant may be an interested party
IP- will stand to benefit financially under the will, would take under intestate succession but not under the will; or a person interested in the welfare of an incapacitated person including a minor
forfeiture clause
- designed to deter a beneficiary form challenging the will
- B will lose B’s share if he files a challenge
- if the claim is baseless, then clause is enforceable
- will not be enforced if claimant has just cause and brought claim in GF
Testamentary capacity- proof
-person challenging the will bears the burden of proving the T lacked capacity at the time of executing the will
T must know at capacity
- nature of the act
- nature and character of her property
- natural objects of his bounty
- plan of the attempted disposition
- doesn’t actually have to know, just must have ability*
Challenging capacity
1) general capacity
2) insane delusion
3) undue influence
insane delusion
- false belief to which the T adheres in spite of all reason and evidence to the contrary
- objective= measure T’s insane delusion against that of a rational person in T’s position; rational person could not have reached the same conclusion
- must show the insane delusion was a but-for cause of the testamentary dispositon
undue influence
- coercive relationship
- contestant alleges a 3P controlled the T’s decision-making process
- contestant must show:
1) existence and exertion of influence
2) cause of suspect disposition
3) influence overpowered the mind and the will of the T
Susceptibility, motive, opportunity, causation
confidential realtionshpi
- presumption of undue influence when influencer had a confidential relationship with the T
- usually professional– doctor, therapist, can be familial
consequences of undue influence
- B is treated as if he predeceases the T to the extent the gift is in excess of the B’s intestate share
- causation is the key element
drafter rule
-any provision making a gift to the drafter of the will or her family is invalid unless the drafter is related to the T
Fraud
-contestant bears the burden of showing that the B engaged in an unlawful misrepresentation at the time of the execution
Elements of fraud
1) intent to deceive the testator and
2) purpose of influencing the testamentary disposition
kinds of fraud
1) inducement- causes T to make a different will than the T would have made otherwise (ex: leave to different person)
2) execution- misrepresentation as to the character or contents of the will (different contents)
remedy= constructive trust