Will Contests Flashcards

1
Q

Who has standing to contest a will?

A
  1. Heirs (because they would stand to get more via intestacy)
  2. Beneficiaries of PRIOR wills (because they would stand to get more if the new will is invalid)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who has the burden of proof in a will contest?

A

The person contesting the will has the burden of proving the will is invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the five grounds for contesting a will?

A

Challenger can argue that Testator:

  1. Failed to meet the elements of a valid will;
  2. Made the will under insane delusions;
  3. Made the will under undue influence;
  4. Made the will under duress; OR
  5. Made a mistake in will’s creation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the four ways a will fails to meet the elements of a valid will?

A

Challenger can state that the Testator or will lacks:

  1. Legal capacity;
  2. Testamentary capacity;
  3. Testamentary intent; OR
  4. Necessary formalities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is insane delusion w/r/t contesting a will?

A

A persistent belief in supposed facts that are against all evidence, probability, and control.

(Insane delusion destroys T’s capacity ONLY IF there is a connection between the delusion and the property disposition! i.e., Delusion MUST impact the disposition in the will.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must a contesting party prove to show T was under undue influence when making the will?

A

Person seeking to prove undue influrnce must prove:

  1. The influence existed and was exerted;
  2. The influence overpowered T’s mind; AND
  3. T therefore executed a will which he would not have otherwise executed (i.e., causation element).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How can a person prove undue influence?

A
  1. Direct evidence (rarely available)
  2. Circumstantial evidence
  3. Fiduciary relationship
  4. Drafting attorney named as beneficiary
  5. Drafting attorney is executor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are five factors that may help show circumstantial evidence that speaks to undue influence w/r/t contesting a will?

A
  1. Unnatural disposition (e.g., cutting out family members)
  2. Opportunity to influence T (e.g., access to T)
  3. Confidential/fiduciary relationship with T
  4. Ability of T to resist influence
  5. Beneficiary was involved with drafting or execution of the will

[This is a FACTOR test! Any one MAY be sufficient, but laregly fact-dependant]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the rule on fiduciary relationships w/r/t showing undue influence for purposes of contesting a will?

A

A will contestant can satisfy the inference of undue influence if:

  1. The will makes a gift to a person in a confidential relationship with T, AND
  2. That person was active in the drafting/execution of the will.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Putnam Scrutiny?

A

The Court will AUTOMATICALLY look into any will where there is a bequest made to a drafting attorney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must an attorney do if he is BOTH the drafting attorney AND named as the executor of T’s estate?

A

Attorney must give WRITTEN notice to Testator that:

  1. Any person can be named executor, not just an att’y;
  2. The executor receives a statutory commission; AND
  3. Att’y will be entitled to legal fees for representing the estate.

(T must sign the written notice in the presence of two witnesses)

(If Att’y fails to comply with these requirements, his statutory commission is cut by 50%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is DURESS w/r/t contesting a will

A

Like undue influence, but connotes violent conduct, e.g., T forced to sign will under threat of physical harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is MISTAKE w/r/t contesting a will?

A

T’s error when there was no conduct on the part of another party to cause the mistake to arise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two types of mistakes w/r/t contesting a will?

A
  1. Mistake in the factum/execution (T was wrong about the identity or contents of the instrument so lacked the necessary testamentary intent)
  2. Mistake in inducement (T is mistaken about some extrinsic fact and makes a will based on that fact)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an in terrorem/no contest/forfeiture provision?

A

Clause that “scares” beneficiary who would get more through intestacy into not contesting the will for fear of getting nothing if the challenge fails.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the general rule in NY on in terrorem clauses?

A

In general, NY enforces in terrorem clauses even if the contestant was acting in good faith and had probable cause!

(BUT SEE exceptions!)

17
Q

What are the five situations where NY will NOT enforce an in terrorem clause?

A

NY will not enforce an in terrorem clause if the contesting party:

  1. Claims that the will is a forgery;
  2. Claims that the will was revoked by a later will;
  3. Is filing on behalf of a minor or incompetant person;
  4. Claims improper will construction; OR
  5. Objects to the jurisdiction of the court.
18
Q

What is the safe harbor provision for a person considering contesting a will that has a no-contest clause?

(Concerns discovery)

A

A person considering contesting a will that has a no-contest clause MAY examine in discovery any of the following without triggering the clause protections:

  1. The person who prepared the will;
  2. The attesting witnesses;
  3. The will proponents; AND
  4. The nominated executors.