Will Contests Flashcards
Mistake
assumption is that testator read the will and intended its consequences, thus the plain meaning of the will won’t be overturned by extrinsic evidence.
latent ambiguity
a mis-description, the error is not evident by looking at the will.
In this case extrinsic evidence is admissible to clarify testator’s words.
what if the extrinsic evidence fails
if extrinsic evidence does not cure the ambiguity, then the gift fails, because there is no ascertainable beneficiary
patent ambiguity
an obvious error on the face of the will
facts and circumstances evidence is admissible
evidence of what testator said to attorney is admissible
not admissible– evidence of testator’s declarations to third parties
Conditional wills
a will that expressly provides that it will be operative only if some condition prevails
ARGUE BOTH WAYS
contract to make a will/ JOINT WILL
the will of two people in one document
if a joint will is a contractual will and the survivor breaches the contract by executing a later Will with inconsistent provisions
- we have a contractual will + a survivor breached then, probate the existing will even though written as a contract and
- impose a constructive trust in favor of the intended beneficiaries…
revoking a contractual will
this can be done while both parties to the agreement are still alive, but cannot be done on behalf of the deceased spouse.
testamentary capacity
a testator must have sufficient capacity to:
1) understand the nature of the act
2) know the nature and approximate value of his property
3) know the natural object of his bounty
4) understand the dispositions and gifts he is making
insane delusion
testator is generally of sound mind but has a persistent belief in supposed facts against all evidence which cause or affect her making of the will
undue influence
the will contestant has the burden to prove
1) existence and exertion of an influence
2) affect of such influence must over power the mind and power of the testator AND
3) the product is a will or a gift in a will which would not have happened but for the influence.
Putnam scrutiny
automatic scrutiny for gifts made to lawyers who write wills
no-contest clause/ in terrorem clause
clause in a will that says if anyone objects to my will, they will get nothing.
NY gives full effect
UNLESS:
fraud or forgery
will was drafted on behalf of an infant or incompetent
a construction proceeding
objection to the jurisdiction of the court